Brassring, formerly from IBM and part of the Kenexa Talent Acquisition Suite, and now sold by Infinite Computer Solutions, is an enterprise grade ATS and onboarding solution. It allows companies to find the right talent, track and manage candidates, and use candidate data to spot trends within the applicant pool.
N/A
Infor Talent Science
Score8.7 out of 10
N/A
Infor Talent Science is a cloud-based talent intelligence platform that uses Predictive Talent Analytics and pre-employment testing to find the right employees.
The solution leverages large quantities of behavioral and performance data to help organizations build diverse teams and personalized career pathing strategies.
Customized insights from predictive behavioral assessment models help businesses select, retain, and develop the right talent across the entire employee life cycle.
N/A
Pricing
Brassring
Infor Talent Science
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Brassring
Infor Talent Science
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Brassring
Infor Talent Science
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Brassring and Infor Talent Science
Feature
Brassring
7.5
11 Ratings
5% below category average
Infor Talent Science
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management
7.711 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
7.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
7.710 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
7.711 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customized Application Form
7.111 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
7.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
7.110 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
8.310 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
8.310 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
7.18 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
7.46 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
7.710 Ratings
00 Ratings
User Permissions
7.49 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
7.710 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
7.110 Ratings
00 Ratings
Talent Intelligence
Comparison of Talent Intelligence features of Brassring and Infor Talent Science
Kenexa is is well suited for any organization that has more than 3000 employees globally. I would not recommend this to startups or a growing organization with less than 3000 employees. But once you cross this number, Kenexa becomes useful and is a brilliant tool for global operations - recruiting. I would recommend this tool to any organization that has offices in many countries/geographies as well.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I would recommend Infor Talent Science to other colleagues, particularly those working in structured hiring environments. The platform is great at using behavioral science to improve hiring quality and predict potential outcomes. It has become a valuable tool for our business to help align candidates with roles based on proven success rather than just the interviewers intuition alone.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Kenexa allows Boolean key word search within a particular requisition so it makes sifting through a high number of applicants manageable and effective
Kenexa can be tailored to meet individual business needs. During the time we’ve had Kenexa here I’ve used it in support of a few different business segments and for each the way the system was used to “position” candidate statuses have varied based on the individual need of the business. One example is when interviewing a high volume of applicants internationally, we were able to send qualified applicants through to the “event manager” and it would enable the candidate to select his/her interview date/time based on previously submitted options inputted by our Kenexa users.
Kenexa allows one to customize and score questions for each open requisition that applicants complete as they apply. The system then sorts applicants according to the score of candidate answers allowing for easy sorting of top qualified candidates.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
BrassRing's application system for candidates is prone to freezing and crashing in the middle of the application causing potential candidates to lose all progress. I filled out the application myself and witnessed these issues first hand, on top of several complaints I received via phone and email from candidates attempting to apply via the BrassRing service. Also, the Parsing system within the application is not capable of pulling any meaningful information out of text documents.
Each user must be added to each job in order for that job, and the candidates in it, to show up in relevant searches. This becomes a problem when a new team member joins the account and needs access to all of the previous openings just so that they can find candidates already in the system. The account I was working on involved literally hundreds of new openings a month, meaning that any movement of personnel on or off the account would mean having to update potentially thousands of old positions just to allow them to be able to mine the ATS for candidates. I don't see any particular reason why someone with access to the system should have to be given access to each individual job. If a particular position needs to be kept confidential for whatever reason then that individual position should be able to be set to only show to authorized recruiters. The rest of the positions should automatically be searchable by anyone with appropriate access to the ATS to allow for basic level candidate mining and movement.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I am confident that the Kenexa product will continue to evolve to meet the needs of our business in an ever changing work environment. The affiliation with IBM also plays a factor as we have a long standing successful relationship with IBM products. We will be looking to integrate other Kenexa products in the near future to streamline our HR processes.
I feel like I am pretty decent with computers and systems. It was fairly easy to use it after about a week or two . But I have seen people struggle with it as well as some people not use it at all. It can be slow at times and not work at times. But Its a fine system.
The platform is well-designed for recruiting and provides detail and actionable insights, but there is a learning curve that prevents it from being completely intuitive out of the gate. From a recruiter’s perspective, the core functionality is strong and reliable. Candidate scorecards, behavioral insights, and interview guides are easy to access once you’re familiar with the system, and the data is presented in a way that supports informed decision-making rather than overwhelming users. The reason for the slightly lower score is that navigation and setup can take time to fully understand, particularly for new users or hiring managers who don’t use the system daily. Some workflows require multiple steps, and certain reports or features are not immediately obvious without training or prior experience.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is a very basic system. It may be OK for entry level positions only. The practice of removing CVs while the recruitment process is ON is disturbing and there is no one to explain or to inform why it is being done. Even a routine mail is not sent to the client/consultant. I am surprised how this system is continuing without too many complaints.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
SF ATS was not available at the time and Taleo was thought to be too expensive. In retrospect, given the amount of customization and leveraging of other vendor technology for things like analytics I suspect any cost advantage we realized evaporated
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I have used and evaluated several other talent assessment and hiring platforms, including tools focused on behavioral assessments, personality testing, and skills-based screening. These include solutions similar to Predictive Index–style assessments, generic personality assessments, and ATS-embedded screening tools that offer lighter evaluation capabilities. Compared to many of these options, Infor Talent Science stands out for its depth of behavioral science and predictive accuracy. While some platforms provide surface-level personality insights or one-size-fits-all assessments, Infor Talent Science benchmarks candidates against actual top performers within the organization, which makes the insights far more relevant and actionable.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info