Brassring, formerly from IBM and part of the Kenexa Talent Acquisition Suite, and now sold by Infinite Computer Solutions, is an enterprise grade ATS and onboarding solution. It allows companies to find the right talent, track and manage candidates, and use candidate data to spot trends within the applicant pool.
N/A
TeamWise
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
TeamWise is an HRMS and Payroll Management Software that performs HR functions in a single platform. The product comprises of comprehensive features that include: Leave and Attendance Management, Payroll Management, Talent Management, Performance Management, Time Tracking, Grievance Handling, and Recruitment Management.
$6,000
Per Seat per Month
Pricing
Brassring
TeamWise
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$6,000
Per Seat per Month
Standard
$10,000
Per Seat per Month
Advanced
$11,400
Per Seat per Month
Professional
$12,600
Per Seat per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Brassring
TeamWise
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Brassring
TeamWise
Features
Brassring
TeamWise
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
7.5
11 Ratings
6% below category average
TeamWise
8.4
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Job Requisition Management
7.711 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Company Website Posting
7.410 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
7.710 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
7.711 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Customized Application Form
7.111 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
7.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
7.110 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Candidate Search
8.310 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
8.310 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Collaboration
7.18 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
7.46 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
7.710 Ratings
00 Ratings
User Permissions
7.49 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
7.710 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Reporting
7.110 Ratings
00 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
TeamWise
8.4
1 Ratings
4% above category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
TeamWise
8.4
1 Ratings
3% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
TeamWise
8.3
1 Ratings
1% above category average
Approval workflow
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Balance details
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
TeamWise
8.4
1 Ratings
2% above category average
View and generate pay and benefit information
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Update personal information
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
View company policy documentation
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Employee recognition
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
View job history
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
TeamWise
8.0
1 Ratings
1% above category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
TeamWise
8.3
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Report builder
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Pre-built reports
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
TeamWise
8.5
1 Ratings
6% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
TeamWise
8.3
1 Ratings
3% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
TeamWise
8.2
1 Ratings
4% above category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Kenexa is is well suited for any organization that has more than 3000 employees globally. I would not recommend this to startups or a growing organization with less than 3000 employees. But once you cross this number, Kenexa becomes useful and is a brilliant tool for global operations - recruiting. I would recommend this tool to any organization that has offices in many countries/geographies as well.
Kenexa allows Boolean key word search within a particular requisition so it makes sifting through a high number of applicants manageable and effective
Kenexa can be tailored to meet individual business needs. During the time we’ve had Kenexa here I’ve used it in support of a few different business segments and for each the way the system was used to “position” candidate statuses have varied based on the individual need of the business. One example is when interviewing a high volume of applicants internationally, we were able to send qualified applicants through to the “event manager” and it would enable the candidate to select his/her interview date/time based on previously submitted options inputted by our Kenexa users.
Kenexa allows one to customize and score questions for each open requisition that applicants complete as they apply. The system then sorts applicants according to the score of candidate answers allowing for easy sorting of top qualified candidates.
BrassRing's application system for candidates is prone to freezing and crashing in the middle of the application causing potential candidates to lose all progress. I filled out the application myself and witnessed these issues first hand, on top of several complaints I received via phone and email from candidates attempting to apply via the BrassRing service. Also, the Parsing system within the application is not capable of pulling any meaningful information out of text documents.
Each user must be added to each job in order for that job, and the candidates in it, to show up in relevant searches. This becomes a problem when a new team member joins the account and needs access to all of the previous openings just so that they can find candidates already in the system. The account I was working on involved literally hundreds of new openings a month, meaning that any movement of personnel on or off the account would mean having to update potentially thousands of old positions just to allow them to be able to mine the ATS for candidates. I don't see any particular reason why someone with access to the system should have to be given access to each individual job. If a particular position needs to be kept confidential for whatever reason then that individual position should be able to be set to only show to authorized recruiters. The rest of the positions should automatically be searchable by anyone with appropriate access to the ATS to allow for basic level candidate mining and movement.
I am confident that the Kenexa product will continue to evolve to meet the needs of our business in an ever changing work environment. The affiliation with IBM also plays a factor as we have a long standing successful relationship with IBM products. We will be looking to integrate other Kenexa products in the near future to streamline our HR processes.
I feel like I am pretty decent with computers and systems. It was fairly easy to use it after about a week or two . But I have seen people struggle with it as well as some people not use it at all. It can be slow at times and not work at times. But Its a fine system.
It is a very basic system. It may be OK for entry level positions only. The practice of removing CVs while the recruitment process is ON is disturbing and there is no one to explain or to inform why it is being done. Even a routine mail is not sent to the client/consultant. I am surprised how this system is continuing without too many complaints.
SF ATS was not available at the time and Taleo was thought to be too expensive. In retrospect, given the amount of customization and leveraging of other vendor technology for things like analytics I suspect any cost advantage we realized evaporated