inriver PIM vs. PimLayer

inRiver [PIM] is pretty easy to use. I can see a company with a more narrow product selection benefiting from this PIM. The challenge comes with the more SKUs and categories the company offers. Without our 3rd party implementor creating specialized imports for us, we would be having a difficult time managing mass data updates.

Incentivized

• Scalability
• Data Integrations
• Workflow

Incentivized

• Missing the ability to be able to right click an item/product to open in a new tab
• Mass Asset/SKU management is not an out-of-the-box feature
• Shared folders area - few options to create a specialized area that you can block other users from deleting

Incentivized

inRiver has been both helpful and responsive to our needs. Their customer service and ticketing system are top-notch - timely communications and followup

Incentivized

It's really easy to use. There are no confusion on the user experience and the interface, very straight forward. If you want to change environments it's a simple dropdown. If you want to publish or put an item to draft it's just a simple click of a button of the family/item's status

Incentivized

Our previous systmes are the brandmaker PIM and DAM. I have used it for quite a while and the advantages on a technical architecture perspective is that importing of products from Brandmaker it needs to go first on a SFTP server before it goes on our website and that brings us more maintenance work

Incentivized

• Quicker go-to-market
• Improved templates for customer data
• Scalable for our growing organization

Incentivized