TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Intapp Time

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AIntapp in Palo Alto offers Intapp Time, a legal billing application focusing on managing alternate fee structures and rich information for analysis and optimization.N/A

    LinkedIn Talent Hub

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/ALinkedIn Talent is a recruiting solution. It offers core ATS capabilities, as well as proactive recruitment outreach tailored to LinkedIn’s site. LinkedIn Talent also enables competitive insights and recruitment marketing.N/A
    Pricing
    Intapp TimeLinkedIn Talent Hub
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Intapp TimeLinkedIn Talent Hub
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Intapp TimeLinkedIn Talent Hub
    Considered Both Products
    Intapp
    No answer on this topic
    LinkedIn
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Would buy again
    43 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    39 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    45 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    39 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Implementation went as expected
    39 Answers
    Features
    Intapp TimeLinkedIn Talent Hub
    Recruiting / ATS
    Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Intapp Time and LinkedIn Talent Hub
    Feature
    Intapp Time
    -
    Ratings
    LinkedIn Talent Hub
    7.0
    77 Ratings
    12% below category average
    Job Requisition Management00 Ratings4.063 Ratings
    Company Website Posting00 Ratings7.067 Ratings
    Publish to Social Media00 Ratings8.067 Ratings
    Job Search Site Posting00 Ratings7.069 Ratings
    Customized Application Form00 Ratings7.059 Ratings
    Resume Management00 Ratings7.065 Ratings
    Duplicate Candidate Prevention00 Ratings7.953 Ratings
    Candidate Search00 Ratings8.076 Ratings
    Applicant Tracking00 Ratings8.058 Ratings
    Collaboration00 Ratings8.064 Ratings
    Task Creation and Delegation00 Ratings7.256 Ratings
    Email Templates00 Ratings6.065 Ratings
    User Permissions00 Ratings6.060 Ratings
    Notifications and Alerts00 Ratings6.070 Ratings
    Reporting00 Ratings7.761 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Intapp TimeLinkedIn Talent Hub
    Small Businesses
    Time Doctor
    Score8 out of 10
    Crelate
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Toggl Track
    Score9 out of 10
    CareerSiteBuilder
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    TimeCamp
    Score7.3 out of 10
    JobDiva
    Score8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Intapp TimeLinkedIn Talent Hub
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    7.0
    (79 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.5
    (22 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Intapp TimeLinkedIn Talent Hub
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Intapp
    Time recording and time entry are such a massive and universal pain point for all timekeepers. All timekeepers perform this task on an almost daily basis. Anything that speeds up or eases that task is worth its weight in gold. Even if a timekeeper is working on a project that is billed on a fixed fee we still need accurate time entries to ensure that we are meeting our own profitability objectives.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    LinkedIn
    I really feel like [LinkedIn Talent Hub] has great potential to be used by many many companies. I think if it is made a little more user friendly with a little more development on the back end to remove some bugs, this could be a potential game changer. I have enjoyed working and getting to know this.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Intapp
    • Timers: IntApp Time's timer functions are well thought out and meet the esoteric needs of different timekeeper's styles
    • Integration: IntApp Time integrates well with our accounting systems.
    • IntApp Time has been a reliable application for us.
    • Users perfer the IntApp Time interface to other products.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    LinkedIn
    • Source of talent - LinkedIn has become the #1 place to engage talent.
    • Targeting / advertising / sponsoring employment ads are very effective. They are costly, but effective.
    • Connecting with talent via InMails and ability to send InMails to a pretty targeted audience with ease is great. This allows you to reach out/connect fast with people that "fit" what you are looking for. Other sites for recruiting, etc. are hit and miss. The quality of results is the strongest on LinkedIn and has been for many, many years.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Intapp
    • Interface could be updated (appears outdated)
    • Having multiple timers open in one screen to start and stop projects fluidly
    • Better mobile app time keeping
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    LinkedIn
    • Reporting. Major lacking here. If a job is closed then reopened (which that feature was recently removed), all reporting is wiped clean and picked back up with the "reopen" date. So it doesn't give a full history of the job activity.
    • Lacks adequate approvals in the system.
    • If you're a company with a risk of audits, I would not recommend Talent Hub. They lack compliance: the system allows us to "hire" someone who never applied to the job. Req history could be incomplete with the way reporting functions are set up. The system puts passive "sourced" candidates and applicants in the same bucket for pipeline workflows. Disposition status is inadequate and greatly lacking, etc.
    • Dashboard is not customizable.
    • We do not have our own unique req IDs. The system generates project IDs but these numbers are shared with all their clients, they're not unique to Ora so they are somewhat random and not in order.
    • They do not differentiate between a networking project and an approved requisition.
    • There's more, too many to list.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Intapp
    No answers on this topic
    LinkedIn
    The LinkedIn Talent Hub is a very easy to use and widely known by other users. If someone is hiring, its very visible and accessible. I have never had trouble posting exactly what I need. However, I have had trouble finding the candidate I am looking for. It tends to not bring in a lot of candidates
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Intapp
    No answers on this topic
    LinkedIn
    Although we never experienced any issues with the LinkedIn Talent platform or required any support, we always knew in the event that we did need assistance, it was readily available. LinkedIn as a whole is always very supportive and responsive whenever I've had any issues or even a simple question in the past. I'm sure anyone experiencing difficulties with the platform would have a resolution from the support team just about instantly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Intapp
    There are three competitors to Intapp Time that I know of, and have looked at, but it's been years. Those competitors are Element55, Aderant Found Time and Smart Time. Every time I compared any of those products to the current version of Intapp Time then Intapp Time came out on top. Element 55 seemed have a bit of a clunky interface when I last looked. Aderant Found Time seemed like a limited success at copying Intapp Time; the software itself seemed a little burdensome, both on the client and the back end.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    LinkedIn
    It's definitely better than other competitors because of one a better pool of candidates, who are well categorised and filtered, and the database is well updated. Also, it has a better UI with end to end hiring requirement management, that helps to make hiring faster and smarter. The UX though is a bit laggy, which can be improved
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Intapp
    • Obviously, time capture for billing is a vital function. At this time we believe IntApp Time is best of the breed in this regard, though competition is coming.
    • Recording timekeeping is something all timekeepers hate. IntApp time doesn't do as much as it potentially could to ease this pain, using predictive algorithms for example.
    • For timekeepers who are diligent, IntApp time provides all the tools necessary to record and closely manage worked time, its primary functionality.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    LinkedIn
    • Positive impact. The tool has helped us in finding quality candidates for our hard to fill positions!
    • Helps in “pipelining” even after we fill a position, we make a folder of prospective candidates that we find through the platform. This list is then revisited once we have additional positions!
    • Outreach to global candidates. We have an office in Spain and we have found so many qualified candidates on the platform to fill those positions!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots