JarviX vs. JMP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
JarviX
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Synergies is a cognitive application service provider that combines business knowledge, artificial intelligence technology, and software development. Their mission is to help businesses through their digital transformation journey, become leaders and innovators in their industries by unlocking the power of data in the hands of business users and decision makers. Their product, JarviX, is an AnalyticOps Platform . JarviX uses NLP…N/A
JMP
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
JMP is a division of SAS and the JMP family of products provide statistical discovery tools linked to dynamic data visualizations.
$1,320
per year per user
Pricing
JarviXJMP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
JMP
$1320
per year per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JarviXJMP
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsBulk discounts available.
More Pricing Information
Features
JarviXJMP
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
JarviX
7.6
2 Ratings
7% below category average
JMP
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports8.21 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards7.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.31 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
JarviX
7.8
2 Ratings
3% below category average
JMP
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis7.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities7.31 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration7.72 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
JarviX
7.8
1 Ratings
6% below category average
JMP
-
Ratings
Publish to Web9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF7.31 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Versioning6.41 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.21 Ratings00 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers8.21 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
JarviX
8.2
2 Ratings
3% above category average
JMP
-
Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.31 Ratings00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics8.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
JarviX
9.2
2 Ratings
8% above category average
JMP
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)9.62 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
JarviX
9.1
1 Ratings
15% above category average
JMP
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
JarviXJMP
Small Businesses
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 8.9 out of 10
IBM SPSS Statistics
IBM SPSS Statistics
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Alteryx Platform
Alteryx Platform
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Score 9.7 out of 10
Dataiku
Dataiku
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
JarviXJMP
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(2 ratings)
9.0
(29 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(16 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(2 ratings)
8.0
(6 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.2
(2 ratings)
9.2
(7 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(2 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
JarviXJMP
Likelihood to Recommend
Synergies Intelligent Systems
JarviX is very good at data integration, creating charts and reports for data visualization. It is really impressive that Jarvix can let our marketing team know the number of members living in a specific area in seconds. In addition, the product manager from Synergies is willing to help us with all problems we encounter. I accidentally changed one of the settings in a data table which threw the existing dashboard into chaos. However, after assistance from the product manager, we were able to successfully bring the data back to normal.
Read full review
JMP Statistical Discovery
It is perfectly suited for statistical analyses, but I would not recommend JMP for users who do not have a statistical background. As previously stated, the learning curve is exceptionally steep, and I think that it would prove to be too steep for those without statistical background/knowledge
Read full review
Pros
Synergies Intelligent Systems
  • The algorithm platform is handy
  • Time-saving
  • Real-time data update
  • Database docking
Read full review
JMP Statistical Discovery
  • JMP is designed from the ground-up to be a tool for analysts who do not have PhDs in Statistics without in anyway "dumbing down" the level of statistical analysis applied. In fact, JMP operationalizes the most advanced statistical methods. JMP's design is centred on the JMP data table and dialog boxes. It is data focused not jargon-focussed. So, unlike other software where you must choose the correct statistical method (eg. contingency, ANOVA, linear regression, etc.), with JMP you simply assign the columns in a dialog into roles in the analysis and it chooses the correct statistical method. It's a small thing but it reflects the thinking of the developers: analysts know their data and should only have to think about their data. Analyses should flow from there.
  • JMP makes most things interactive and visual. This makes analyses dynamic and engaging and obviates the complete dependence on understanding p-values and other statistical concepts(though they are all there) that are often found to be foreign or intimidating.
  • One of the best examples of this is JMP's profiler. Rather than looking at static figures in a spreadsheet, or a series of formulas, JMP profiles the formulas interactively. You can monitor the effect of changing factors (Xs) and see how they interact with other factors and the responses. You can also specify desirability (maximize, maximize, match-target) and their relative importances to find factor settings that are optimal. I have spent many lengthy meetings working with the profiler to review design and process options with never a dull moment.
  • The design of experiments (DOE) platform is simply outstanding and, in fact, the principal developers of it have won several awards. Over the last 15 years, using methods broadly known as an "exchange algorithm," JMP can create designs that are far more flexible than conventional designs. This means, for example, that you can create a design with just the interactions that are of interest; you can selectively choose those interactions that are not of interest and drop collecting their associated combinations.
  • Classical designs are rigid. For example, a Box-Benhken or other response surface design can have only continuous factors. What if you want to investigate these continuous factors along with other categorical factors such as different categorical variables such as materials or different furnace designs and look at the interaction among all factors? This common scenario cannot be handled with conventional designs but are easily accommodated with JMP's Custom DOE platform.
  • The whole point of DOE is to be able to look at multiple effects comprehensively but determine each one's influence in near or complete isolation. The custom design platform, because it produces uniques designs, provides the means to evaluate just how isolated the effects are. This can be done before collecting data because this important property of the DOE is a function of the design, not the data. By evaluating these graphical reports of the quality of the design, the analyst can make adjustments, adding or reducing runs, to optimize cost, effort and expected learnings.
  • Over the last number of releases of JMP, which appear about every 18 months now, they have skipped the dialog boxes to direct, drag-and-drop analyses for building graphs and tables as well as Statistical Process Control Charts. Interactivity such as this allows analysts to "be in the moment." As with all aspects of JMP, they are thinking of their subject matter without the cumbersomeness associated with having to think about statistical methods. It's rather like a CEO thinking about growing the business without having to think about every nuance and intricacy of accounting. The statistical thinking is burned into the design of JMP.
  • Without data analysis is not possible. Getting data into a situation where it can be analyzed can be a major hassle. JMP can pull data from a variety of sources including Excel spreadsheets, CSV, direct data feeds and databases via ODBC. Once the data is in JMP it has all the expected data manipulation capabilities to form it for analysis.
  • Back in 2000 JMP added a scripting language (JMP Scripting Language or JSL for short) to JMP. With JSL you can automate routine analyses without any coding, you can add specific analyses that JMP does not do out of the box and you can create entire analytical systems and workflows. We have done all three. For example, one consumer products company we are working with now has a need for a variant of a popular non-parametric analysis that they have employed for years. This method will be found in one of the menus and appear as if it were part of JMP to begin with. As for large systems, we have written some that are tens of thousands of lines that take the form of virtual labs and process control systems among others.
  • JSL applications can be bundled and distributed as JMP Add-ins which make it really easy for users to add to their JMP installation. All they need to do is double-click on the add-in file and it's installed. Pharmaceutical companies and others who are regulated or simply want to control the JMP environment can lock-down JMP's installation and prevent users from adding or changing functionality. Here, add-ins can be distributed from a central location that is authorized and protected to users world-wide.
  • JMP's technical support is second to none. They take questions by phone and email. I usually send email knowing that I'll get an informed response within 24 hours and if they cannot resolve a problem they proactively keep you informed about what is being done to resolve the issue or answer your question.
Read full review
Cons
Synergies Intelligent Systems
  • There should be more flexibility in changing the data tables uploaded into JarviX. For example, it should enable users to edit the syntax of the table or change the data format of the columns without affecting the existing dashboard and charts already created using that data table.
Read full review
JMP Statistical Discovery
  • In general JMP is much better fit for a general "data mining" type application. If you want a specific statistics based toolbox, (meaning you just want to run some predetermined test, like testing for a different proportion) then JMP works, but is not the best. JMP is much more suited to taking a data set and starting from "square 1" and exploring it through a range of analytics.
  • The CPK (process capability) module output is shockingly poor in JMP. This sticks out because, while as a rule everything in JMP is very visual and presentable, the CPK graph is a single-line-on-grey-background drawing. It is not intuitive, and really doesn't tell the story. (This is in contrast with a capability graph in Minitab, which is intuitive and tells a story right off.) This is also the case with the "guage study" output, used for mulivary analysis in a Six Sigma project. It is not intuitive and you need to do a lot of tweaking to make the graph tell you the story right off. I have given this feedback to JMP, and it is possible that it will be addressed in future versions.
  • I've never heard of JMP allowing floating licenses in a company. This will ALWAYS be a huge sticking point for small to middle size companies, that don't have teams people dedicated to analytics all day. If every person that would do problem solving needs his/her own seat, the cost can be prohibitive. (It gets cheaper by the seat as you add licenses, but for a small company that might get no more than 5 users, it is still a hard sell.)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Synergies Intelligent Systems
No answers on this topic
JMP Statistical Discovery
JMP has been good at releasing updates and adding new features and their support is good. Analytics is quick and you don't need scripting/programming experience. It has been used organization wide, and works well in that respect. Open source means that there are concerns regarding timely support. Cheap licensing and easy to maintain.
Read full review
Usability
Synergies Intelligent Systems
JarviX is very easy to use, once everyone learns how to use JarviX to produce their own data reports, it reduces IT’s workload.
Read full review
JMP Statistical Discovery
The overall usability of JMP is extremely good. What I really love about it is its ability to be useable for novices who have no coding experience, which is not the case with most other, similar, programs. It can output a fast and easy analysis without too much prior coding or statistical knowledge.
Read full review
Support Rating
Synergies Intelligent Systems
JarviX is very easy to use, once everyone learns how to use JarviX to produce their own data reports, it reduces IT’s workload.
Read full review
JMP Statistical Discovery
Support is great and give ease of contact, rapid response, and willingness to 'stick to the task' until resolution or acknowledgement that the problem would have to be resolved in a future build. Basically, one gets the very real sense that another human being is sensitive to your problems - great or small.
Read full review
Online Training
Synergies Intelligent Systems
No answers on this topic
JMP Statistical Discovery
I have not used your online training. I use JMP manuals and SAS direct help.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Synergies Intelligent Systems
Tableau and Power BI. Obviously, they are not in the same category. Tableau and Power BI only provide data visualizations plus a little bit of analytics. JarviX not only provides data exploration, so you can find out what the problem is, as well as model management and App builder. If you only look for a dashboard, yes BI is probably enough, but if you constantly feel lacking actionable insights for actual implementations of improvements, JarviX is the choice for you.
Read full review
JMP Statistical Discovery
It is great because it has UI menus but it costs money whereas the other programs are free. That makes it ideal for beginners but I think that RStudio and Python are going to make someone a lot more marketable for future opportunities since most companies won't pay for the software when there is a great free option.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Synergies Intelligent Systems
  • I think the best part of JarviX is that we can get the analysis results in several minutes. We spent lots of time making reports and managing our data in the past. All in all, it helps us save the time, cost, and labor of managing data.
Read full review
JMP Statistical Discovery
  • ROI: Even if the cost can be high, the insights you get out of the tool would definitely be much more valuable than the actual cost of the software. In my case, most of the results of your analysis were shown to the client, who was blown away, making the money spent well worth for us.
  • Potential negative: If you are not sure your team will use it, there's a chance you will just waste money. Sometimes the IT department (usually) tries to deploy a better tool for the entire organization but they keep using the old tool they are used too (most likely MS Excel).
Read full review
ScreenShots

JarviX Screenshots

Screenshot of APPsScreenshot of AutoMLScreenshot of ForecastScreenshot of HomeScreenshot of Root Cause AnalysisScreenshot of War Room

JMP Screenshots

Screenshot of the graph builderScreenshot of the experiment design interfaceScreenshot of hierarchical and KMeans clustering, which are available from the Multivariate platformScreenshot of a scatterplot multivariate analysisScreenshot of a scatterplotScreenshot of the graph builder