We saved millions using JMP 4.0, what can you do with JMP 15+?
December 04, 2019
We saved millions using JMP 4.0, what can you do with JMP 15+?
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Software Version
JMP Pro
Overall Satisfaction with JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
JMP is in use for our Six Sigma and Lean programs at the organizational level. The software has a yearly corporate license program due to its widespread use.
Pros
- Data exploration.
- Visual statistical analyses.
- Rapid acceptance by novice users.
- Excellent public forums for assistance with uncommon challenges.
- Outstanding technical support.
- Great people creating a great product.
Cons
- Interactive platforms could be better, especially when trying to use exported interactive graphics.
- Improved 'bailout' when the user needs to stop the 'spinning ball' associated with prolonged calculations.
- Expanded descriptions as to strategies using neural and other higher end ML programming. Hard to know the approach for choosing the number of nodes, trials, etc. The webinars are helpful but a bit more clarity would be helpful.
- Dependent calculations made with custom formatting (e.g., use of currency) for subsequent derivative calculations should also show in the same (currency) format.
- JMP has resulted in literally millions of dollars in ROI due to identification of correctable errors.
- Use of JMP control charts JMP has greatly simplified and improved interpretation of Lean, FMEA, and PDSA type analyses.
- Use of JMP has enable the testing and subsequent selection of 'best practices' saving uncounted hours in false starts based on 'collective experience'.
- The down side is that JMP is not a 'magic box', one still has to take care in applying the tools properly. Moreover, time-consuming approaches using JMP may still be the 'order of the day', because the service (even power user) is unaware of significant shortcuts available for free on the JMP community website.
JMP is superior to the MS Excel product in its graphical presentation and graphical exploration platforms. It has minor deficiencies in the lack of a 'goal seek' formula (although one can sort of get to this using the simulation platforms in some of the higher level ML toolsets). It also lacks in the ability to create a user interface tool so useful in Access. For example, it would be nice if factors identified in a neural net or other predictive platforms could be used to create an input and result page which could be used by non-JMP users (i.e., the calculated outputs are driven by the predictive algorithms).
Do you think JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS's feature set?
Yes
Did JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation