Likelihood to Recommend
Initially you may think it’s not worth paying and that there are better free options, which is definitely a lie we once tried to live with. It has everything you may ever need in .NET world, code analysis and debugging works super well and all the SQL/noSQL related integrations are just next level compared to the competition. It’s worth every penny.
Read full review
Spyder is an open-source Python IDE designed for the movement of data science work. Spyder comes with an
package manager distribution, so depending on your setup you may have installed it on your machine.
Spyder includes most of the "standard IDE" features you can expect, such as a strong syntax code editor, Python code rendering, and an integrated text browser.
Spyder is used when we want to develop a code that is useful and able to explore proper documentation of the code that has been written. We use Spyder to perform data-related operations like filtration, cleaning, and enhancing the data qualities. There some cases where it is less appropriate like working in an environment, creating dashboards of data visualizations and plots.
Read full review Pros Provides a smooth, efficient IDE for developing .NET applications. Performance has been much better than Visual Studio in my experience. Integrated refactoring tools are really comprehensive and useful. Integrates with other JetBrains products such as TeamCity, Upsource, dotTrace, etc. Read full review Debugging of your existing code Generates figures very quickly as part of a figures tab which lets users understand results quickly Different layouts are available for the software which will give the users freedom to decide what layout works best for them Read full review Cons Startup time. It takes a while to index big projects. Rarely it loses the intellisense and the only way to get it back is by restarting. Read full review Colors in code format Add a broadcast to share the project with friends Contains more than one important language such as Python Read full review Likelihood to Renew
Due to the performance and productivity benefits we get with Rider, we will continue to use it for the foreseeable future.
Read full review Usability
Rider is a great IDE with extensive C# refactoring support and .NET-specific knowledge. This is great for building .NET applications but for our purposes, the Unity specific suggestions are really helpful.
JetBrains Rider is great as an editing and debugging environment. It reliably connects to the Unity editor and allows debugging, which some IDEs are not as reliable at doing.
Read full review Support Rating
Customer support provided by JetBrains is quite fast and effective. The issues we have encountered were solved within days, which we find reasonable and a very adequate time frame. Bug fixes are added to releases depending on their severity which makes perfect sense. However, we have not encountered any issue which we would consider to be a major problem.
Read full review
Most of data scientists or data engineers are either using ec2 on the cloud or
locally. It is a bit hard to find people who are still using Spyder and have the sight of the IDE and can help you to answer your question.
Read full review Alternatives Considered
Rider is hands down smoother and way less glitchy than Visual Studio Enterprise. There are way more refactoring capabilities and spell check so that your code is readable, maintainable, and easy to follow. Since Rider is cross-platform, our developers are no longer constrained to only using Windows. We can now get a familiar development environment across Mac, Windows, or Linux!
Read full review
It is not fair to say that Spyder takes upward from all these IDE's, but likewise
is also useful for the Python programming purpose. But as the visual studio it is more suitable and also helps in collaboration work, but Spyder has the limitations working with git and other stuff.
Read full review Return on Investment All people using the same IDE makes it much easier to ramp-up and collaborate Development and maintainment can be done in a more efficient way Read full review Less time spent on employee training. Limited integration with Git. No tools for repository. Read full review ScreenShots