Joomla! vs. Kontent.ai

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Joomla
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Joomla! is a free and open source content management system used to publish web content. Included features are page caching, RSS feeds, printable versions of pages, news flashes, blogs, polls, a search function, and support for language internationalization.N/A
Kontent.ai
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Kontent.ai is a headless CMS. In the Kontent.ai platform, control over content underpins all operations and workflows. Content creators, enabled by native AI skills, collaborate in real time, making it easier to land on the best ideas, reduce bottlenecks, and maximize the impact of everything that’s created while maximizing content velocity. Kontent.ai is an adaptable API-first cloud-native solution, so developers can use their favorite technologies, languages, and frameworks to deliver seamless…
$0
2 Users
Pricing
Joomla!Kontent.ai
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Developer
$0.00
2 Users
Scale
Contact Sales
10 Users
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Custom number of Users
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JoomlaKontent.ai
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Joomla!Kontent.ai
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Joomla!
7.0
44 Ratings
14% below category average
Kontent.ai
8.2
1 Ratings
2% above category average
Role-based user permissions7.044 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Joomla!
6.5
41 Ratings
17% below category average
Kontent.ai
9.1
2 Ratings
17% above category average
API7.039 Ratings9.12 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language6.140 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Joomla!
7.2
47 Ratings
5% below category average
Kontent.ai
8.5
2 Ratings
11% above category average
WYSIWYG editor6.046 Ratings00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness8.044 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin section8.443 Ratings8.62 Ratings
Page templates7.045 Ratings00 Ratings
Library of website themes9.043 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design7.043 Ratings7.72 Ratings
Publishing workflow6.143 Ratings9.12 Ratings
Form generator6.039 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Joomla!
6.6
45 Ratings
11% below category average
Kontent.ai
8.2
2 Ratings
11% above category average
Content taxonomy8.044 Ratings9.12 Ratings
SEO support7.044 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Bulk management4.142 Ratings7.32 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions8.045 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Community / comment management6.143 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Joomla!Kontent.ai
Small Businesses
Divi
Divi
Score 9.8 out of 10
Divi
Divi
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Image Relay
Image Relay
Score 9.5 out of 10
Image Relay
Image Relay
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Joomla!Kontent.ai
Likelihood to Recommend
6.1
(68 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(28 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.9
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.9
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.8
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.7
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.9
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Joomla!Kontent.ai
Likelihood to Recommend
The Joomla Project
It seems with the release of Joomla! 4 that the weak areas have all been covered. Its always been good for the mid-level small to large business, the blogging was WP, and the large-scale enterprise was probably bespoke. But the new interface is so simple it seems pointless using WP when Joomla! is as easy and can then grow as big as you like. The Workflows feature which allows you to set up work pipelines easily is going to be a boom to any larger enterprise sites. Couples with the new API which I got to see at one of their user groups, is amazing. They were creating articles on one site then another site was taking the feed directly for just certain categories. Really blows your mind what you could do with that and the new workflows.
Read full review
Kontent.ai
Really easy integration to all of our services and apps. Delivery API libraries make the integration really fast. On the other hand, I miss the option to use SSO (Single Sign-On) with the Professional version of the Kentico Kontent. However, it is included in the Enterprise package.
Read full review
Pros
The Joomla Project
  • We use Joomla to build our websites and web applications because of its incredible intuitiveness and tools to make everything more manageable.
  • Its working environment is quite comfortable for my development team, and its web design resources significantly speed up our work when carrying out web development projects.
  • It allows you to use blocks to create and visually manage websites and divide them into different categories without programming knowledge.
Read full review
Kontent.ai
  • Management of multilingual content.
  • Content collaboration and control over the entire content lifecycle.
  • A well-documented delivery API and easy integration with any systems across the digital experience stack.
Read full review
Cons
The Joomla Project
  • Because Joomla's user community is smaller than WP, it lacks as many choices from 3rd party developers, meaning it can be a little more difficult to find the right extension for what you need to accomplish
  • Along the same vein, most of the best 3rd-party software for Joomla! is paid
  • Simple features such as Add to Menu and Cache cleaners should be adopted as part of the Joomla! core, though they are available as extensions
  • Joomla! could use a simpler and easier URL rewriting process
Read full review
Kontent.ai
  • Offer a smaller subscription package for small projects.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
The Joomla Project
I gave it a rating of 10 because I just love how Joomla! works, how it is set up and how it handles many users. Also it is very fast, and there is no overload on the MySQL database or servers ever.
Read full review
Kontent.ai
No answers on this topic
Usability
The Joomla Project
Joomla! 3.x is easily installed either manually or via a script provided by your host. It contains most of the tools needed to begin creating websites right from the start. Those features that it doesn't have are easily installed via links and buttons from the thousands of extensions available in the community
Read full review
Kontent.ai
No answers on this topic
Performance
The Joomla Project
Today's Modern Joomla performs very well and is robust and durable. The pages load faster than they ever did in the past and Modern Joomla's integration into other software or systems has become seamless. Modern Joomla sites will last long and will stay running forever.
Read full review
Kontent.ai
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The Joomla Project
Between the core Joomla developers who are excellent at answering questions and providing support, you have a whole community of developers who work with Joomla and are happy to help fellow developers out answering questions and supporting the Joomla project. Out of the many communities I am involved in for open-source software, Joomla's community is by far the best.
Read full review
Kontent.ai
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The Joomla Project
It is good if you know Joomla! if not it can get a bit confusing
Read full review
Kontent.ai
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
The Joomla Project
Joomla has gone through tremendous growing pains. It is now better than ever. But before, when it was going from 1.5-2.5, the templates and plugins would break over and over again. If you don't understand what Joomla was trying to do back then, you might have a bad attitude toward it. Today, those pains are over and things don't break like they used to during that time period.
Read full review
Kontent.ai
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The Joomla Project
We tested other platforms like WordPress, Magento and some local CMS. 
But Joomla offered us better resources for generating content.
Joomla is a CMS suitable for many types of projects, especially if you have several people editing content at the same time.
It allows you to maintain visual standardization and offers many options for working with images.
With its ability to control access to different articles, categories or even different components, it is a great tool, even if they are managed by different people.
Read full review
Kontent.ai
Unified access to the same content without the need to duplicate it across multiple solutions. We do not need to set up a complicated infrastructure to start using the Kentico Kontent.
Read full review
Return on Investment
The Joomla Project
  • Joomla has reduced our costs of rolling out a new website because it uses less developer time and can be rolled out by individual users as needed.
  • Joomla has a lot of extensions and add-ons that make it easy to create and implement advanced solutions quickly.
Read full review
Kontent.ai
  • Highly positive ROI.
  • Shorten project delivery.
  • Single source of truth for all content.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Kontent.ai Screenshots

Screenshot of the new add-on, Web Spotlight, combines in-context website management with the flexibility and multi-channel support of a headless CMS.Screenshot of Major UI redesign released in 2021.Screenshot of flexible workflows to make sure content is published on time and on brand, and improve team work.Screenshot of content types that serve as templates for content items so that each item has a predefined structure. The Kontent.ai authoring experience caters to every user, providing guidelines and context for each content type.Screenshot of Kontent.ai's integrations with other apps and automates processes with webhooks.Screenshot of the updated editorial calendar.