TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Jupyter Notebook

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AJupyter Notebook is an open-source web application that allows users to create and share documents containing live code, equations, visualizations and narrative text. Uses include: data cleaning and transformation, numerical simulation, statistical modeling, data visualization, and machine learning. It supports over 40 programming languages, and notebooks can be shared with others using email, Dropbox, GitHub and the Jupyter Notebook Viewer. It is used with JupyterLab, a web-based IDE for…N/A

    Mathematica

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AWolfram's flagship product Mathematica is a modern technical computing application featuring a flexible symbolic coding language and a wide array of graphing and data visualization capabilities.

    $1,520

    per year

    Pricing
    Jupyter NotebookMathematica
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Standard Cloud
    $1,520
    per year
    Standard Desktop
    $3,040
    one-time fee
    Standard Desktop & Cloud
    $3,344
    one-time fee
    Mathematica Enterprise Edition
    $8,150.00
    one-time fee
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Jupyter NotebookMathematica
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsDiscounts available for students and educational institutions. The Network Edition reduce per-user license costs through shared deployment across any number of machines on a local-area network.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Jupyter NotebookMathematica
    Considered Both Products
    Open Source
    No answer on this topic
    Wolfram
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    23 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    23 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    22 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    17 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    20 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Jupyter NotebookMathematica
    Platform Connectivity
    Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Jupyter Notebook and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Jupyter Notebook
    9.0
    22 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Connect to Multiple Data Sources10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Extend Existing Data Sources10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic Data Format Detection8.514 Ratings00 Ratings
    MDM Integration7.415 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Exploration
    Comparison of Data Exploration features of Jupyter Notebook and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Jupyter Notebook
    7.0
    22 Ratings
    19% below category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Visualization6.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Interactive Data Analysis8.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Preparation
    Comparison of Data Preparation features of Jupyter Notebook and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Jupyter Notebook
    9.5
    22 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Transformations10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Encryption8.514 Ratings00 Ratings
    Built-in Processors9.314 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform Data Modeling
    Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Jupyter Notebook and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Jupyter Notebook
    9.3
    22 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Machine Learning9.218 Ratings00 Ratings
    Single platform for multiple model development10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self-Service Model Delivery8.020 Ratings00 Ratings
    Model Deployment
    Comparison of Model Deployment features of Jupyter Notebook and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Jupyter Notebook
    10.0
    20 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Flexible Model Publishing Options10.020 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, Governance, and Cost Controls10.019 Ratings00 Ratings
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Jupyter Notebook and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Jupyter Notebook
    -
    Ratings
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.9
    6 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings9.84 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards00 Ratings9.94 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings9.96 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Jupyter Notebook and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Jupyter Notebook
    -
    Ratings
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.9
    9 Ratings
    23% above category average
    Drill-down analysis00 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities00 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings9.99 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Jupyter Notebook and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Jupyter Notebook
    -
    Ratings
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.3
    8 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Publish to Web00 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Publish to PDF00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Report Versioning00 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.95 Ratings
    Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings8.95 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Jupyter Notebook and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Jupyter Notebook
    -
    Ratings
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.9
    9 Ratings
    24% above category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings9.99 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics00 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Jupyter NotebookMathematica
    Small Businesses
    RapidMiner
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Chartio (discontinued)
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Anaconda
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Jet Reports
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Watson Studio
    Score10 out of 10
    Kibana
    Score8.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Jupyter NotebookMathematica
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (23 ratings)
    9.9
    (9 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.5
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Jupyter NotebookMathematica
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    I've created a number of daisy chain notebooks for different workflows, and every time, I create my workflows with other users in mind. Jupiter Notebook makes it very easy for me to outline my thought process in as granular a way as I want without using innumerable small. inline comments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    We are the judgement that Wolfram Mathematica is despite many critics based on the paradigms selected a mark in the fields of the markets for computations of all kind. Wolfram Mathematica is even a choice in fields where other bolide systems reign most of the market. Wolfram Mathematica offers rich flexibility and internally standardizes the right methodologies for his user community. Wolfram Mathematica is not cheap and in need of a hard an long learner journey. That makes it weak in comparison with of-the-shelf-solution packages or even other programming languages. But for systematization of methods Wolfram Mathematica is far in front of almost all the other. Scientist and interested people are able to develop themself further and Wolfram Matheamatica users are a human variant for themself. The reach out for modern mathematics based science is deep and a unique unified framework makes the whole field of mathematics accessable comparable to the brain of Albert Einstein. The paradigms incorporated are the most efficients and consist in assembly on the market. The mathematics is covering and fullfills not just education requirements but the demands and needs of experts.
    Mathematica is incompatible with other systems for mCAx and therefore the borders between the systems are hard to overcome. Wolfram Mathematica should be consider one of the more open systems because other code can be imported and run but on the export side it is rathe incompatible by design purposes. A better standard for all that might solve the crisis but there is none in sight. Selection of knowledge of what works will be in the future even more focussed and general system might be one the lossy side. Knowledge of esthetics of what will be in the highest demand in necessary and Wolfram is not a leader in this field of science. Mathematics leves from gathering problems from application fields and less from the glory of itself and the formalization of this.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • Simple and elegant code writing ability. Easier to understand the code that way.
    • The ability to see the output after each step.
    • The ability to use ton of library functions in Python.
    • Easy-user friendly interface.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    • It allows straightforward integration of analytic analysis of algebraic expressions and their numerical implemented.
    • Supports varying programmatic paradigms, so one can choose what best fits the problem or task: pure functions, procedural programming, list processing, and even (with a bit of setup) object-oriented programming.
    • The extensive and rich tools for graphical rendering make it very easy to not just get 2D and 3D renderings of final output, but also to do quick-and-dirty 2D and 3D rendering of intermediate results and/or debugging results.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • Need more Hotkeys for creating a beautiful notebook. Sometimes we need to download other plugins which messes [with] its default settings.
    • Not as powerful as IDE, which sometimes makes [the] job difficult and allows duplicate code as it get confusing when the number of lines increases. Need a feature where [an] error comes if duplicate code is found or [if a] developer tries the same function name.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    • Should include more libraries and functions.
    • Should include more functions that can be used in Machine Learning.
    • Should include more functions that can be used in Data Science.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Open Source
    Jupyter is highly simplistic. It took me about 5 mins to install and create my first "hello world" without having to look for help. The UI has minimalist options and is quite intuitive for anyone to become a pro in no time. The lightweight nature makes it even more likeable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Open Source
    I haven't had a need to contact support. However, all required help is out there in public forums.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    Wolfram Mathematica is a nice software package. It has very nice features and easy to install and use in your machine. Besides this, there is a nice support from Wolfram. They come to the university frequently to give seminars in Mathematica. I think this is the best thing they are doing. That is very helpful for graduate and undergraduate students who are using Mathematica in their research.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    With Jupyter Notebook besides doing data analysis and performing complex visualizations you can also write machine learning algorithms with a long list of libraries that it supports. You can make better predictions, observations etc. with it which can help you achieve better business decisions and save cost to the company. It stacks up better as we know Python is more widely used than R in the industry and can be learnt easily. Unlike PyCharm jupyter notebooks can be used to make documentations and exported in a variety of formats.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    We have evaluated and are using in some cases the Python language in concert with the Jupyter notebook interface. For UI, we using libraries like React to create visually stunning visualizations of such models. Mathematica compares favorably to this alternative in terms of speed of development. Mathematica compares unfavorably to this alternative in terms of license costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • Positive impact: flexible implementation on any OS, for many common software languages
    • Positive impact: straightforward duplication for adaptation of workflows for other projects
    • Negative impact: sometimes encourages pigeonholing of data science work into notebooks versus extending code capability into software integration
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    • Easy to solve huge mathematical equations, so it saved time there
    • Doing analysis and plotting graphs is also another plus point
    • Learning is very slow, and it took lot of time to learn its scripting language
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots