Kantar Research Services vs. User Interviews

Really relevant for testing new product launches with customers. Often NPD fails to find the sweet spot of differentiation and impact (commercial or customer impact) and having the insights to test along the journey makes teams more agile and more motivated to trial new things without sinking over cost where you move from a concept to reality. Also helpful for studying different types of marketing impacts for longer-term campaigns on customer perceptions which are important measures of success beyond the commercial.

Incentivized

Good: - When one needs to recruit participants for User research fast. It’s particularly fast when someone doesn’t need niche sample - bad: - n/a (it’s difficult for me to say when I’m using it for 3 years with multiple clients and I’m a researcher. User interview does what I need)

Incentivized

• There studies provide brand insights in the most particular way.
• They also help in media planning & measuring their effectiveness.
• Helps in building brands.

Incentivized

• The platform can be confusing to navigate at times; UX could be simplified.
• Ability to utilize more competitive datasets would be helpful.
• Sometimes takes a while to return data and build out full insights.

Incentivized

Easy to use, better pricing, deeper understanding.

Incentivized

User Testing: - UI has the great feature of double screening that you can really select your participants based on the research requirements and they are not approved automatically.

Therefore not every question in the screener needs to be filtering.

Incentivized

• From my position, it's having a positive impact on the people involved in planning customer-led projects - more innovation that is bolder, more confidence we are focussing on the right areas, less time trying to sign things off or dissect where things went wrong, or convincing leadership teams to keep the the testing.

Incentivized