Kickbox vs. Proofy

I haven't used many other email validation products before, only a couple of 'free' cloud-based options with limited list size capability. Kickbox is super professional, easy to use, and works.

Incentivized

The system is feasible, and they have an superb customer service team always amenable to help when desired. It proffer a very great service and a free trial for new users. Very speedy and forthright to use and very inexpensive. Great tool to verify emails, its all good about the product work very fluently and entirely attractive

Incentivized

• Finding misspelled emails
• Including domain name in Excel output that is produced
• Easy to use software

Incentivized

• Accuracy in its checker.
• Powerful too for email validation.
• Functionality is excellent.

• Catching spam traps
• Too many emails in "unknown" category when cleaning B2B emails
• More accurate cleaning overall

Incentivized

• I think they could generate an expansion of the number of emails to thousands I have had some scanning problems; I am not sure if it is something overcrowded.

Incentivized

I like Kickbox output files better as it includes the "domain". Overall, both softwares could do a better job cleaning lists. Kickbox shows more "unknown" emails where are BriteVerify shows less "unknown emails" but then more bad emails end up in the valid list. Kickbox has a higher threshold to put emails in "unknown".

Incentivized

The server of the Lusha Extension was very low that's why leave the software and the results of proofy was just amazing overall. We love the adeptness to send a bulk email list, as well as integrate the platform with API. overall features are very effective and very easy to use.

Incentivized

• Our servers are in great reputation

Incentivized

• Higher ROI.
• Streamlining mailing list and reducing costs on emails sent out.
• Better security.