LexisNexis supports legal research with Lexis Advance Quicklaw, its Canadian legal research database acquired in 2002.
N/A
Thomson Reuters Westlaw
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Westlaw, now supported by Thomson Reuters is a legal research software and database, emphasizing access to a breadth of case law.
$115
per month
Pricing
Lexis Advance Quicklaw
Thomson Reuters Westlaw
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Westlaw Edge Single State Essentials
$115.00
per month
Westlaw Edge Single State Primary Law
$183.20
per month
Westlaw Edge Single State Primary Law
$237.00
per month
Westlaw Edge All States Primary Law
$249.60
per month
Westlaw Edge All States and Federal Primary Law
$315.20
per month
Westlaw Edge Single State Primary Law and Analytical
$404.00
per month
Westlaw Edge Premium
$582.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Lexis Advance Quicklaw
Thomson Reuters Westlaw
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Lexis Advance Quicklaw
Thomson Reuters Westlaw
Considered Both Products
Lexis Advance Quicklaw
Verified User
Manager
Chose Lexis Advance Quicklaw
We have access, and therefore use it as a secondary resource or use it when an integration is convenient. Lexis offers a lot of various integrations and apps but they all have various issues. I feel like they should concentrate on just having one solid research service rather …
Lexis Advance is way better in terms of usability and search features. The content is pretty much the same for both platforms except in Litigation where WestLaw is much stronger than Lexis. However, the Feature functionality of Lexis is a lot better to keep users efficient and …
Well suited for case law research across many areas of law in Canada. Specifically found that it works well for extensive research where there are lots of things going on. It works well for reviewing precedents that need to be considered to make decisions for taking a decision. Less suitable for situations where we need access to real documents from the courts such as decisions or motions as Lexis doesn’t have that.
Perhaps well-suited in enterprise agreements where many users need access to many areas, and a giant contract is cost effective. This was a good company to work with as a student and instructor where value was not my specific concern. I cannot speak to the value paid by the responsible party in that context.
The specific product ordered was fine, but it was far too easy to mindlessly incur ancillary charges without warning. This is much less user friendly than other, similar providers of services such as LexisNexis. The Thomson Reuters Westlaw experience is not intuitive when compared to other, similar providers and ended up being less cost effective.
I was passed around like a hot potato and nameless responders were somewhat disrespectful and "snippy." There was no offer to resolve the issue I complained about, and I was basically made to feel as though I was lying about the problem. The solution was easy: fix my customized home screen to remove the possibility of wandering into a non-subscription area. This fix was never offered or pursued. Instead, I was offered the option of signing up for additional services.
Lexis Advance is way better in terms of usability and search features. The content is pretty much the same for both platforms except in Litigation where WestLaw is much stronger than Lexis. However, the Feature functionality of Lexis is a lot better to keep users efficient and productive and collaboration is also good.
We considered switching to Bloomberg Law because of the contractual provisions with Westlaw but ultimately decided to stay. The cost of getting out of the contract term was cost-prohibitive and left us with no choice.
