Lexis+ vs. Thomson Reuters Practical Law

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Lexis+
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Lexis+ is a legal research tool used to resolve legal research issues through its case law collection, editorial analysis, and data visualization, which are all accessed via one simplified AI search experience.
$80
per month
Thomson Reuters Practical Law
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Thomson Reuters offers Practical Law, a research assistance tool containing up-to-date legal intelligence decisions, aimed at providing strategic advantage to legal teams.
$632
per month
Pricing
Lexis+Thomson Reuters Practical Law
Editions & Modules
Lexis State Primary
$80
per month
Lexis+ State Primary
$125
per month
Lexis State Enchanced with Full Federal
$130
per month
Lexis+ State Enchanced with Full Federal
$135
per month
Practical Law for Government - Basic
$119.00
per month per seat
Practical Law for Government - Essentials
$166.00
per month per seat
Practical Law for Law Firms - Drafting and Negotiating
$199.20
per month per seat
Practical Law for Law Firms - Litigation and Advisory
$199.20
per month per seat
Practical Law for Government - Premium
$238.00
per month per seat
Practical Law for Law Firms - Premium
$427.20
per month per seat
Practical Law General Counsel - US
$632.70
per month per seat
Practical Law General Counsel - Connect US
$1,399.35
per month per seat
Practical Law General Counsel - Connect US Dynamic
$1,571.30
per month per seat
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Lexis+Thomson Reuters Practical Law
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscounts available for multi-year plans.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Lexis+Thomson Reuters Practical Law
Considered Both Products
Lexis+

No answer on this topic

Thomson Reuters Practical Law
Chose Thomson Reuters Practical Law
Lexis Practice Advisor is an excellent alternative - but Practical Law has more comprehensive coverage of topics and practice areas - as well as more frequent updates to tools and checklists. Also, Practice Law integrates well with WestLaw which is great for having all the …
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons
User Ratings
Lexis+Thomson Reuters Practical Law
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(6 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.8
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Lexis+Thomson Reuters Practical Law
Likelihood to Recommend
LexisNexis
Lexis Advance is highly customizable and intuitive, perfect for solo or small practitioners who lack the patience for extended training and too much searching. The contracts are also customizable and can be graduated for new practices so you don't go broke in year one paying for research. I do wish there was more contact with a dedicated account rep, and perhaps not with sales. In a larger firm, you can stack more features and content as needed. I probably would go back in time and renegotiate my contract, which stepped up quite a lot in year two and will step up again in year 3 to what I think will be an uncomfortable level. Also, Lexis has maybe one too many brands and could stand a redesign of the main home page.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
PracticalLaw offers excellent Practice Notes, Checklists, Precedents, and Toolkits for a variety of practice areas - which is very helpful to in-house counsel and law clerks that are working on files across different practice areas. Less appropriate when there are already many resources available to me to help in drafting documents - then there is not much use to look up PLC.
Read full review
Pros
LexisNexis
  • I like the annotated statutes. That is typically where I start my searches.
  • I seem to find more relevant case law on Lexis than I have through Westlaw.
  • Their training and research attorneys are very helpful.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • Resource guides
  • Practical tips from practitioners
  • Templates
  • Recent articles and news
Read full review
Cons
LexisNexis
  • The notes from cases function is not as strong as other competitors
  • Lacks some features that more novel sources use
  • Costly
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • Navigation can get tricky with some scenarios
  • Some of the features can be offered for free as opposed to paid
  • Sometimes there are precedents and forms that are not updated
Read full review
Usability
LexisNexis
Very intuitive, easy to use visual qualitative assessments, and I like that they don't "summarize" rules but give exact quotes from cases. The product is super customizable and you can try before you buy. Unlike their main competitor, I don't feel like they tricked me or set me up to purchase more content that I don't need--so in terms of service and overall functionality, they are superior to the competition.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
LexisNexis
Haven't reached out except for password help but the response was quick. A couple times it locked me out for no reason
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
LexisNexis
Lexis Advance and Westlaw do the same thing and are very comparable. We actually use both. If Lexis Advanced doesn't have content we are looking for, it can usually be found in Westlaw. They compliment each other well. If I had to pick one over the other I would choose Lexis Advanced, but it's close.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
They are pretty similar. I rely on practical law for certain practice areas more, and rely on the other platforms for other areas as they are more comprehensive and up to date. Lexis also is connected with Law360, and has a different set of resources, and has a strong shepherdizing tool that integrates well with what I need to do sometimes.
Read full review
Return on Investment
LexisNexis
  • It's had a positive impact in finding more cases that are on point for my cases.
  • It was actually cheaper than their competitor.
  • The natural language search is better than the competitor.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • Able to efficiently work on more files
  • Get up to speed on new topics
  • Better help cross-functional departments with more diverse issues
Read full review
ScreenShots