TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Linear

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/ALinear is a purpose-built issue tracking and project management system designed for software engineering teams. It prioritizes high-performance synchronization and keyboard-driven workflows to streamline the product development lifecycle from initial triage to feature release.

    $12

    per month per user

    Zenhub

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/AZenHub is a project management solution that runs native within GitHub with collaboration boards, file sharing, and pipeline selection.

    $8.33

    per month per user

    Pricing
    LinearZenhub
    Editions & Modules
    Basic
    $12
    per month per user
    Business
    $18
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    Custom
    Free
    $0
    Growth
    $8.33
    per month per user
    Growth
    $8.33
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    Contact us
    Enterprise
    Contact us
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    LinearZenhub
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual billing.The listed prices are per user, per month when billed annually.
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    LinearZenhub
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Linear and Zenhub
    Feature
    Linear
    -
    Ratings
    Zenhub
    7.2
    10 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Task Management00 Ratings8.010 Ratings
    Resource Management00 Ratings7.34 Ratings
    Gantt Charts00 Ratings6.34 Ratings
    Scheduling00 Ratings9.13 Ratings
    Workflow Automation00 Ratings6.37 Ratings
    Team Collaboration00 Ratings7.010 Ratings
    Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings8.010 Ratings
    Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
    Document Management00 Ratings5.43 Ratings
    Email integration00 Ratings8.33 Ratings
    Mobile Access00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
    Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Change request and Case Management00 Ratings9.72 Ratings
    Professional Services Automation
    Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Linear and Zenhub
    Feature
    Linear
    -
    Ratings
    Zenhub
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Quotes/estimates00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Project & financial reporting00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    LinearZenhub
    Small Businesses
    Sentry
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Any.do
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Sentry
    Score8.8 out of 10
    KanbanFlow
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft To Do
    Score7.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    LinearZenhub
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.5
    (13 ratings)
    7.3
    (10 ratings)
    Usability
    8.8
    (13 ratings)
    7.0
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.3
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    LinearZenhub
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Linear
    Linear is particularly well suited for teams that need a fast, intuitive way to organize and prioritize work across multiple projects. In my experience, it's been especially useful for tracking client work by priority, assignee, and project, while providing clear visibility into ownership and progress. Its clean interface makes it easy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zenhub
    If you have more than 2 developers this thing is basically a requirement within github to manage sprints if you use agile methodology. Why use a different website entirely when you can run your entire board right from github itself? I've tried other solutions but basing everything on github issues makes it so no duplicate work has to take place. If the UX quirks and mobile were fixed this would be 10/10 for me! If you're only one or two devs on a team it may be overkill to use, but if you're going to scale it's better to put the process in early.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Linear
    • Linear agent.
    • Quick glance at current status of tickets.
    • Allow customization to view only the relevant tickets and information for each user.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zenhub
    • ZenHub has a lot of basic functionality, so that limits the complexity of the application
    • The ability to provide user defined labels and customize pipelines provides flexibility
    • The integration with GitHub provides a seamless process
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Linear
    • Linear is missing documentation features like Jira Confluence. We can use Notion but it would have been great if Linear offered more comprehensive solution
    • Eventhough we can manage releases with projects, it is hard to manage them when there are multiple projects being released at the same time. The initiatives feature kind of handles this but if we can assign tasks to a release that would be awesome
    • Being able to invite guests without costing extra money. Platforms like Clickup allow you to invite a limited no of guests without costing extra money.
    • Linear is not good if you are software services company and want to manage multiple client projects. Linear is built for product teams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zenhub
    • Additional communication/collaboration inside the platform would be helpful
    • Integration with additional systems like Slack would be a plus
    • sometimes web pages load slowly, but for the most part things are alright
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Linear
    I already spoke to this in a previous question but, if you've ever used Jira, Linear should feel quite natural. It is a project management tool rooted in issues/tickets to which you can also add sub-tasks and various details. There is some customization but Linear has attempted to shape its offering as the most essential features necessary for this type of work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zenhub
    Once it's up and running it's easy to use. It needs a little consideration to get set up perfectly for your own needs, but that is the same for any feature-rich software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Linear
    No answers on this topic
    Zenhub
    Support is good, but quite honestly, I haven't needed any support since 2015. As I remember, I was required to open a ticket and had to wait a few days for resolution. I give it a rating of 8 because of the lag in getting a solid resolution, but it was resolved adequately.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Linear
    When we are using jira it felt light the application itself is very heavy usage and the UI feel like boring and features were not good as compared to Linear. As QA when shifted to Linear i felt huge difference in process of ticket creation and tracking compared to jira and sometimes Jira would get stuck, but Linear didn't.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zenhub
    I have used Workfront in the past, which in my experience, is best with a traditional waterfall methodology, similar to Microsoft Project and the other more traditional project management software projects. ZenHub is truly designed around the agile methodology. Other products that claim they are agile oriented seem to just be adjusting and tweaking their traditional product to include a few agile features.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Linear
    • Improved visibility into work across clients by providing a centralized view of tasks, priorities, and ownership.
    • Increased team efficiency by replacing scattered personal task lists with a shared workflow.
    • Helped prioritize high-impact work by organizing tasks by clients, priority and assignee.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zenhub
    • No official review done.
    • Saves developer time knowing what needs to be done next.
    • Saves leadership time to easily plan sprints and review work done.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Zenhub Screenshots

    Screenshot of Zenhub boards are similar to Kanban boards but more powerful as it's powered by data and objects from GitHub. You can also add multiple repos and automate issues across multiple boards.Screenshot of Get real-time updates on a teams performance with Zenhub reportsScreenshot of See and share work in flight with Zenhub roadmapsScreenshot of Automate hand offs between teams with workflow automationScreenshot of Get a snapshot of a team's productivity from Zenhub boardScreenshot of Request, provide and review story point estimates right on the issue. Reduce time spent in meetings by allowing team members to estimate on their own time right in Zenhub