Lookback vs. Respondent.io

Best suited to conduct remote interviews that are moderated and facilitated by the interviewer/researcher.

Not the best if you want to do it unmoderated, there are much more sophisticated tools out there. Unfortunately, for a design research team that does both these kids of research, it can be hard to get budgets to get two softwares and hence the Unmoderated Feature can seem super undercooked and doesn’t really do the job.

Otherwise it’s a great tool

Incentivized

It is great for participant recruitment on go-pay basis. Perfect for smaller companies and UX teams. but larger companies and teams might want to look into other solutions that could be used at scale

Incentivized

• Organization of user interviews
• Sharing of interviews across the team
• Creating highlights of insights

Incentivized

• Recruitment
• Option to cherry pick participants
• Easy to use

Incentivized

• Unmoderated interviews is still under cooked as a feature
• The process of how participants have to download an app to start an interview is a large friction point for us

Incentivized

• Adding customer meeting links
• custom consent

Incentivized

Once you understand how the interface works, it works great, but there is a learning curve

Incentivized

Zoom was way more expensive and it o is designed to other things apart from just running qualitative interviews. It also requires a different kind of approval and different approval processes to go through when trying to get it simply for qualitative research purposes.

Lookback records, scribes, helps observe and provides a sentiment check as well in the price that it does

Incentivized

We use Respondent.io as a supplementary tool on a go-pay basis. It offers us another channel to recruit participants to explore different financial topics.

Incentivized

• It allows us to understand our customers’ problems in a very team compatible way.

Incentivized

• Time to market
• Better user experience
• Product market fit

Incentivized