Loxo Talent Intelligence Platform vs. TargetRecruit

It's great if paying for full suite of products and if you had a limited footprint within a market and needed traction. It definitely lends itself to the next generation of recruiters and does leverage AI well. It's fast and generally a stable platform that is fairly intuitive to use from the outset

Incentivized

It is well suited for companies that need to: - build a relationship with new clients and candidates - prolong or keep the relationship with existing clients and candidates - personalize emails or messages to clients and candidates, and make sure that it will not take a lot of time - quality check all data entries in a short amount of time - create reports and do mass emails to certain clients and candidates

Incentivized

• Candidate and contact information
• Email campaigns

Incentivized

• Makes candidate/client relationship for personalized
• Makes it possible for us to keep track of all the things happening to a certain client or recruiting candidate
• Let us avoid possible do not contact request due to numerous emails sent by our firms to certain individuals
• Manages cost and time in sourcing and reaching out to candidates

Incentivized

• The training could be significantly expanded
• Some of the "basics" covered on more legacy crm/ATS software not adequately addressed by Loxo
• The interview process on Loxo is not intuitive and feels underdeveloped

Incentivized

• When uploading certain resumes, I hope the TargetRecruit candidate search also maps the previous attachments we included versus just mapping the most recent resume
• When creating reports, I hope the functionality is faster because it loads in minutes instead of seconds
• There are instances where the values we add on a single profile is maxed out or limited - I hope they can make it unlimited values

Incentivized

[Loxo Recruitment Platform is] intuitive to learn and use[.] It would be better if you save searches, had mobile functionality, and had an easier to search the candidates with a NOT feature (not having specific attributes or an empty field)[.]

Incentivized

Timely, caring, and knowledgeable

Incentivized

Loxo was more of a multifaceted product that lends itself to multi client serach agency work

Incentivized

Bullhorn is not as easy to use as TargetRecruit. TargetRecruit is web-based, and you can use it anywhere. The protection is still there because it will send a code to your email if you have used the application to a new device. ZipRecruiter is a way for our firm to get inbound applicants. However, most of those applicants are not a fit for the role. ZipRecruiter doesn't have the functionality to scrutinize and avoid unfit candidates in applying for the role. In totality, LinkedIn was messaging, and the tracking system is not that yet updated as to how TargetRecruit makes it easy, and powerful. LinkedIn message and tracking system still doesn't have the option to let us know how to avoid messaging the candidate once per week. There is a way for you to see it on LinkedIn but it takes more than three clicks for you to do it. Whereas, in TargetRecruit, you can see it immediately in the candidate or client profile.

Incentivized

• we've seen stong ROI on certain candidate campaigns
• Strong on technically focussed searches where technologies and languages matter
• our passive candidates have more than doubled

Incentivized

• Made it possible for our business to manage turnaround time in presenting qualified candidates to clients immediately
• Do not contact request are now down to 1 out of 10 whereas before we are getting 5 out of 10 contacts
• Business development team creates more meetings to possible clients

Incentivized