Zelta vs. Scandit

Scandit

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Zelta	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	Zelta is a cloud-based unified clinical data management and acquisition platform with customizable modules, that can be tailored to the meet the needs of clinical trials and accelerate outcomes.	N/A
Scandit	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Scandit's smart data capture platform enables smart devices, such as smartphones, drones, digital eyewear and robots to interact with physical items by capturing data from barcodes, text, IDs and objects with unmatched speed, accuracy and intelligence.	N/A

Pricing

Zelta

Scandit

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Zelta	Scandit
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

No setup fee

Additional Details

Subscription - For larger organizations and those who need a predictable budget. Most modules included without incurring additional fees. Eligible for volume discounts. Pay per use - For organizations that need flexibility without a long term contractual commitment. Transparent a la carte pricing, no minimums. Fees start when trial goes live.

Contact vendor for pricing informtion.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Zelta	Scandit
Considered Both Products	Zelta Jose Leon zone Manager Chose Zelta It was easier to understand the usability of the software [Zelta]. For our engineers [it] was easier to migrate our data, and fully set up everything. We found out that comparing other software[s], this one is safe, easy to use, has more functionalities, [and it's] easier to … Incentivized Helpful? AG Alex Gatenby Design Manager Chose Zelta IBM Clinical Trail offers an improvement on the above as it is considerably easier to navigate and has many more features. The side did seem faster however and could be used via an app which is useful in a busy environment. Both are around the same price bracket give or take. Incentivized Helpful? NK Nicholas Kutil Clinical Data Manager Chose Zelta Zelta is as good or better than Rave. I believe that Zelta has a more friendly user interface and is easier to navigate on the designer and Site side. CRF build and study build in general appears to be easier and Zelta can be used for almost any kind of clinical study that Rave … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zelta I have used Clindex, Oracle Clinical, MediData, and MS Access for clinical trials. The product I had the most success with was Clindex but Zelta was a close second. I did not select Zelta as it was being used when I joined the company. I became a developer within a few months … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zelta Zelta by Merative supersedes the Medrio EDC at any given point of time and on all evaluation criteria. Also as compared to Medidata Rave EDC, database programming is easier due to its intuitive GUI; someone with little or absolutely no knowledge of any programming language can … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zelta Zelta by Merative supersedes the Medrio EDC at any given point of time and on all evaluation criteria. Also as compared to Medidata RAVE EDC, database programming is easier due to its intuitive GUI and someone with little or absolutely no knowledge of any programming language … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zelta rave, medrio Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zelta Similar database use is mainly study specific. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zelta Zelta system runs faster, easier to use. Incentivized Helpful? AC ANDY CHANG MANAGER Chose Zelta Zelta is selected by the sponsor and it is less expensive than other systems. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zelta Zelta is a fast database, doesn't cause waiting during the data entry or when saving the data. This is mostly appreciated by the site staff as they have limited time and any delay is crucial for them. Zelta has an unlimited option for edit checks that helps collect accurate … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zelta I haven't got an opportunity to evaluate any products. Incentivized Helpful? Raul E. Lopez Manager Data Management Chose Zelta Zelta has an easier set-up, maintenance and modifiability. Also, there is a cost saving when using Zelta by Merative for a study as Medidata is very expensive. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zelta More flexibility with Zelta, less heavy to design and offer[s] strong feature[s]. Rave is a stronger EDC system with a very interesting reporting option and a very good reputation with the users, however very heavy to manipulate from the design side. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Zelta Electronic data management system which is Abbott owned system. The system cannot be currently used outside of Abbott. Incentivized Helpful? AK Alina Krasny Sr. Clinical Data Analyst Chose Zelta The selection was made by previous stakeholders based on Zelta suitability to handle medical device data and costs. Incentivized Helpful?	Scandit No answer on this topic

User Ratings
	Zelta	Scandit
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	8.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Availability	8.2 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Performance	7.3 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	9.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	8.2 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Configurability	8.2 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Ease of integration	7.3 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Product Scalability	7.3 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	7.3 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	7.3 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Zelta	Scandit
Likelihood to Recommend	Zelta is a good tool for companies currently utilizing multiple software platforms to create and monitor clinical trial information. Due to the price, it is best suited for large pharmaceutical manufacturers with active pipelines and high R&D spend. Zelta's value is more limited to smaller, more focused companies. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	It is highly customizable and easy to program. There is a wide variety of data that can be collected from IRB/site information to clinical data. Zelta provides comprehensive edit language to program for accurate results. Page dynamics are very useful when including or hiding certain data questions. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	Would like to have more access to report review. Most of the functions are controlled by the initial data management setup of the specific reports. I would like to be able to run my own custom programs as a CRA (some way to bypass internal programming). Sites note that they are limited in pulling tables (with specific information ) based on internal programming. I only see what DM has allowed with the CVS/EXCEL tables. Better user guide to assist with training. Incentivized Michelle Barrick Clinical Team Lead Read full review	No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew	We are satisfied from our experience with Zelta by Merative, the close collaboration we have with the Zelta team is also something we value. We plan to use Zelta for a long time Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	It is easy to use, it helps us to be more productive, work better with teams anywhere they are, especially during the pandemic it was really helpful, it is easier to find data, to organize data, improving our findings, reducing time significantly, and more importantly been able to help in better ways our patients. Incentivized Jose Leon zone Manager Read full review	No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability	available when needed Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Performance	some audit reports are difficult to download and take time subject pdf also takes some time to download Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	Our organization has been using both Zelta and in-house applications. The main considerations on which one to use for a particular study is time to get the databases running, cost, and ease of use. For some studies, the time and cost of using Zelta are negative factors, and an in-house system is selected. AK Alina Krasny Sr. Clinical Data Analyst Read full review	No answers on this topic
Online Training	very efficient self training Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating	again not sure about it, I wasn't part of our organization yet Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Zelta is as good or better than Rave. I believe that Zelta has a more friendly user interface and is easier to navigate on the designer and Site side. CRF build and study build in general appears to be easier and Zelta can be used for almost any kind of clinical study that Rave can be used for. Incentivized NK Nicholas Kutil Clinical Data Manager Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Time Saving - We could deliver a fully functional eCRF within the record time of 15 days. Cost Saving - Reduces the overall turn around time thus eventually helping stay within the budget. Prompt customer support team thus helping in before time resolution of issues. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots	Zelta Screenshots