Zelta

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Zelta	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	Zelta is a cloud-based unified clinical data management and acquisition platform with customizable modules, that can be tailored to the meet the needs of clinical trials and accelerate outcomes.	N/A

Pricing

Zelta

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Zelta
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

Additional Details

Subscription - For larger organizations and those who need a predictable budget. Most modules included without incurring additional fees. Eligible for volume discounts. Pay per use - For organizations that need flexibility without a long term contractual commitment. Transparent a la carte pricing, no minimums. Fees start when trial goes live.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Zelta
Considered Both Products	Zelta Verified User Director Chose Zelta More flexibility with Zelta, less heavy to design and offer[s] strong feature[s]. Rave is a stronger EDC system with a very interesting reporting option and a very good reputation with the users, however very heavy to manipulate from the design side. Incentivized Helpful? Jose Leon zone Manager Chose Zelta It was easier to understand the usability of the software [Zelta]. For our engineers [it] was easier to migrate our data, and fully set up everything. We found out that comparing other software[s], this one is safe, easy to use, has more functionalities, [and it's] easier to … Incentivized Helpful? AG Alex Gatenby Design Manager Chose Zelta IBM Clinical Trail offers an improvement on the above as it is considerably easier to navigate and has many more features. The side did seem faster however and could be used via an app which is useful in a busy environment. Both are around the same price bracket give or take. Incentivized Helpful? NK Nicholas Kutil Clinical Data Manager Chose Zelta Zelta is as good or better than Rave. I believe that Zelta has a more friendly user interface and is easier to navigate on the designer and Site side. CRF build and study build in general appears to be easier and Zelta can be used for almost any kind of clinical study that Rave … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Professional Chose Zelta I have used Clindex, Oracle Clinical, MediData, and MS Access for clinical trials. The product I had the most success with was Clindex but Zelta was a close second. I did not select Zelta as it was being used when I joined the company. I became a developer within a few months … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Team Lead Chose Zelta Zelta by Merative supersedes the Medrio EDC at any given point of time and on all evaluation criteria. Also as compared to Medidata Rave EDC, database programming is easier due to its intuitive GUI; someone with little or absolutely no knowledge of any programming language can … Incentivized Helpful? Raul E. Lopez Manager Data Management Chose Zelta Zelta has an easier set-up, maintenance and modifiability. Also, there is a cost saving when using Zelta by Merative for a study as Medidata is very expensive. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Employee Chose Zelta Zelta by Merative supersedes the Medrio EDC at any given point of time and on all evaluation criteria. Also as compared to Medidata Rave EDC, database programming is easier due to its intuitive GUI and someone with little or absolutely no knowledge of any programming language … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Team Lead Chose Zelta rave, medrio Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose Zelta Similar database use is mainly study specific. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Professional Chose Zelta I haven't got an opportunity to evaluate any products. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Analyst Chose Zelta Zelta system runs faster, easier to use. Helpful? AC ANDY CHANG MANAGER Chose Zelta Zelta is selected by the sponsor and it is less expensive than other systems. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose Zelta Zelta is a fast database, doesn't cause waiting during the data entry or when saving the data. This is mostly appreciated by the site staff as they have limited time and any delay is crucial for them. Zelta has an unlimited option for edit checks that helps collect accurate … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Employee Chose Zelta Electronic data management system which is Abbott owned system. The system cannot be currently used outside of Abbott. Incentivized Helpful? AK Alina Krasny Sr. Clinical Data Analyst Chose Zelta The selection was made by previous stakeholders based on Zelta suitability to handle medical device data and costs. Helpful?

User Ratings
	Zelta
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (20 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.1 (2 ratings)
Usability	8.0 (19 ratings)
Availability	8.2 (1 ratings)
Performance	7.3 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	9.0 (20 ratings)
Implementation Rating	8.2 (2 ratings)
Configurability	8.2 (1 ratings)
Ease of integration	7.3 (1 ratings)
Product Scalability	7.3 (1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	7.3 (1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	7.3 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Zelta
Likelihood to Recommend	Merative Zelta is a good tool for companies currently utilizing multiple software platforms to create and monitor clinical trial information. Due to the price, it is best suited for large pharmaceutical manufacturers with active pipelines and high R&D spend. Zelta's value is more limited to smaller, more focused companies. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Merative It is highly customizable and easy to program. There is a wide variety of data that can be collected from IRB/site information to clinical data. Zelta provides comprehensive edit language to program for accurate results. Page dynamics are very useful when including or hiding certain data questions. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Merative We cannot have multiple study accesses for a study in the studies supported by Zelta. eg. Coder and Data manager. Though all the study-build related errors are flagged on the study-build page, some errors like incorrect dynamics applied, which eventually affects the subject PDF extraction, reports, etc. When the study is imported from another Zelta studies, certain attributes remain running in the background even if it seems to be disabled. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	Merative We are satisfied from our experience with Zelta by Merative, the close collaboration we have with the Zelta team is also something we value. We plan to use Zelta for a long time Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	Merative Zelta has many different functionalities as well as modules that can be used depending on what the sponsor wants. I like that they are optional so that when building a study, you can give the sponsor options if they want them or not. Many of the optional models I like to use (Training Tracking for example) as they make tracking Site training so much easier than sending training forms out. Incentivized NK Nicholas Kutil Clinical Data Manager Read full review
Reliability and Availability	Merative available when needed Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Performance	Merative some audit reports are difficult to download and take time subject pdf also takes some time to download Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Merative Our organization has been using both Zelta and in-house applications. The main considerations on which one to use for a particular study is time to get the databases running, cost, and ease of use. For some studies, the time and cost of using Zelta are negative factors, and an in-house system is selected. AK Alina Krasny Sr. Clinical Data Analyst Read full review
Online Training	Merative very efficient self training Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Implementation Rating	Merative again not sure about it, I wasn't part of our organization yet Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Merative It was easier to understand the usability of the software [Zelta]. For our engineers [it] was easier to migrate our data, and fully set up everything. We found out that comparing other software[s], this one is safe, easy to use, has more functionalities, [and it's] easier to work with team members everywhere making clinical trials more efficient. Incentivized Jose Leon zone Manager Read full review
Return on Investment	Merative Time savings regarding how long it takes to make an EDC Live. Reduced EDC Go Live time by at least half (from 60 days to 30). Was able to take an EDC live in 14 days on a few occasions. Seamless RTSM IRT integration without adding time to Go Live. Incentivized Raul E. Lopez Manager Data Management Read full review
ScreenShots	Zelta Screenshots