Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) vs. GraalVM
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | Score7.3 out of 10 | N/A | Application Server is an expanded server role in the Windows Server® 2008 operating system. It provided an integrated environment for deploying and running custom, server-based business applications. These applications respond to requests that arrive over the network from remote client computers or from other applications. Application Server is deprecated. | N/A |
GraalVM | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | GraalVM is a universal virtual machine for running applications written in JavaScript, Python, Ruby, R, JVM-based languages like Java, Scala, Groovy, Kotlin, Clojure, and LLVM-based languages such as C and C++. GraalVM removes the isolation between programming languages and enables interoperability in a shared runtime. It can run either standalone or in the context of OpenJDK, Node.js or Oracle Database. Oracle's GraalVM Enterprise is a multilingual virtual machine, which Oracle states… | N/A |
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | GraalVM | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | GraalVM Enterprise is an entitlement with Java SE Subscription at no additional cost. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | GraalVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 7 Answers | 97% Would buy again 35 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 31 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 36 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 21 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | 93% Implementation went as expected 27 Answers | |
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | GraalVM | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | GraalVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 | Oracle Java SE Score8.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | NGINX Score9.1 out of 10 | Oracle Java SE Score8.1 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | GraalVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 9.1 |
| Usability | 10.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.0 | 7.7 |
| Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) | GraalVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |



