Microsoft Entra External ID vs. Symantec IGA

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Entra External ID
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Entra External ID (formerly Azure Active Directory B2C, or alternately, Azure Active Directory External Identities) provides business-to-customer identity as a service. Customers can use their preferred social, enterprise, or local account identities to get single sign-on access to applications and APIs.
$0
per month per active users
Symantec IGA
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Symantec IGA (formerly Layer7 Identity Suite & CA Identity Suite) from Broadcom provides comprehensive identity management and governance capabilities. In addition, Symantec IGA performs risk analysis and certification and enables remediation actions in real-time during the access provisioning steps, thereby improving audit performance and risk posture with preventive policy enforcement.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Entra External IDSymantec IGA
Editions & Modules
Premium P1 (for More than 50,000 MAU)
$0.00325
per month per active users
Premium P2 (for More than 50,000 MAU)
$0.01625
per month per active users
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Entra External IDSymantec IGA
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsA flat fee of $0.03 is billed for each SMS/Phone-based multi-factor authentication attempt.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Entra External IDSymantec IGA
Features
Microsoft Entra External IDSymantec IGA
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Entra External ID
9.4
3 Ratings
13% above category average
Symantec IGA
-
Ratings
ID-Management Access Control9.33 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)9.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Password Management10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation8.73 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Risk Management9.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Entra External IDSymantec IGA
Small Businesses
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.1 out of 10
Teams Manager
Teams Manager
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.7 out of 10
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.7 out of 10
Imprivata Enterprise Access Management
Imprivata Enterprise Access Management
Score 7.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Entra External IDSymantec IGA
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(7 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Entra External IDSymantec IGA
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
In our organisation we use Microsoft Entra External ID primarily to enable non-attenders to remotely login to our tenant and access pre-prepared educational resources. As well as access to tutors, pupils can also communicate with centralised staff who can support them to gain an education. Utilising our external tenant configuration we can develop and deploy our own in house apps to unpin this support intervention.
Read full review
Broadcom
If an organization is looking for a good comprehensive identity management/governance suite that is easy to implement, CA identity manager may be a good/robust product. It is best to understand specific use case for your organization and try out the product before a final purchase decision as is the case with all sw products.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • One of the things that Microsoft Entra External ID does really well is creating user logins, accounts and profile. It is very easy to create them, manage them and delete them. It is fast and reliant.
  • Limit access or authorization feature. We can allow different levels of authorization and access. So that not all the employees would have access to all the data. Only some relaible employees would have access and power to change anything.
  • Mutli factor authentication feature is also a really good feature to secure data. Even overseas vendors need MFS to login which gives double protection to our data.
Read full review
Broadcom
  • It has complete identity management and governance capabilities equipped with a simple, intuitive user experience and helps simplify processes such as user access requests and access certifications. This in turn helps in improved productivity and user satisfaction.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Troubleshooting diagnostic logs effectively requires VS Code
  • Group and role management requires additional effort
  • The programming model (XML) could use some developer experience love
Read full review
Broadcom
  • Bringing on new users and removing existing user when new employee/contractors join or leave an organization can be improved by linking directly to HR module.
  • The slightly complicated GUI makes drill down difficult for a new user.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Microsoft Entra External ID is an all round solid product, and certainly delivers the solution to our needs well. Through use we found that Pupil's become 'experts in avoidance', if they can forget their login details or indeed their device used for MFA, they will and then use that as the excuse for not accessing/completing their assignments. If more MFA options were available (such as delegated MFA) this would really help iron out our entire end user experiences
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I really enjoy how simple it is to connect this Active Directory with other Microsoft Products to collaborate with colleagues and clients.
Read full review
Broadcom
The final contenders were CA and Oracle - Oracle was tedious to implement and maintain while on the other hand CA was easy to implement and maintain and came at a much lower price.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Having monthly active users billing was cost-effective.
  • Helped with the IT support that was already managing the Azure platform of the company; this helped to manage the costs better and optimize them.
Read full review
Broadcom
  • For us, it was a fairly easy implementation over 60 day period that provided ROI fairly quickly
Read full review
ScreenShots