TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is used to provide intelligent detection and control of sensitive information across Office 365, OneDrive, SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, and on the endpoint. It also helps prevent data loss through identifying and preventing risky or inappropriate sharing, transfer, or use of sensitive data on endpoints, apps, and services.N/A

    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/ATrellix Endpoint Security (ENS) solutions apply proactive threat intelligence and defenses across the entire attack lifecycle to keep organizations safer and more resilient.N/A
    Pricing
    Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    92%
    Would buy again
    22 Answers
    80%
    Would buy again
    12 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    19 Answers
    93%
    Delivers good value for the price
    13 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    22 Answers
    80%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    80%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    16 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    11 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    87%
    Implementation went as expected
    20 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    14 Answers
    Features
    Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Data Preparation
    Comparison of Data Preparation features of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Feature
    Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
    9.6
    9 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    -
    Ratings
    Data Encryption9.69 Ratings00 Ratings
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Feature
    Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
    -
    Ratings
    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
    8.3
    15 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Anti-Exploit Technology00 Ratings8.013 Ratings
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
    Centralized Management00 Ratings9.015 Ratings
    Hybrid Deployment Support00 Ratings7.98 Ratings
    Infection Remediation00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management00 Ratings8.012 Ratings
    Malware Detection00 Ratings9.015 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    SentinelOne Singularity
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Forcepoint DLP
    Score8.5 out of 10
    BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Forcepoint DLP
    Score8.5 out of 10
    ESET PROTECT
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.1
    (24 ratings)
    9.0
    (26 ratings)
    Usability
    7.6
    (6 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (6 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionTrellix Endpoint Security ENS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    It's well-suited if you're really deep in the tech stack. If you're an exchange organization that's using the O365 suite, that's in Entra, that's in Azure, it's really great visibility. I think it probably falls apart very quickly if you don't have data from all those planes to feed it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    It provides great web security and will protect your devices against viruses and malware when paired with other security software and hardware. For instance, we have multiple layers of security set up so if McAfee misses something then one of our other barriers will catch the infection or intrusion before it reaches the network. I would not suggest using this product as a standalone agent because I do not think it will be as effective when working by itself. The dashboard also makes it convenient to manage devices, policies, and settings from wherever you are so it's an ideal solution for any IT department to use. I would just suggest using something else as a backup so your network isn't left vulnerable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • I think from a coverage standpoint, it's pretty comprehensive. The areas it covers, of course, include the Microsoft stack, but also focus on using the definitive cloud apps integration to extend visibility and control to third-party cloud apps, endpoints, and even Macs. So those are capabilities.
    • Its comprehensiveness, its simplicity of creating the policies in one place, are definitely one of the plus points the solution has.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    • Provides high fidelity alerting.
    • Allows CSOC analysts to perform forensic triage and alert investigations through containment from a single pane of glass.
    • Provides alert telemetry across on-disk and in-memory attacks.
    • Supports many additional 'bolt-on' modules to provide additional alert context or capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • The main thing is that, within the product's story, some functionalities were deprecated, and traceability was one of them. That meant that before I could tell or pinpoint on a world map where a particular type of access attempt was happening, and now I cannot do that anymore. So that was useful because I could understand how far out a document made it, and then where the issue was. Was an employee trying to open it at home, or was it an external party altogether? I couldn't do that anymore.
    • The second bit that has room for improvement, is the fact that we have quite a lot of legacy documents that were labeled. So they are from previous versions of Office. And at the moment, since November last year, the already labeled documents are not being protected by the labels.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    • The amount of false detections especially the negative ones needed to be reduced.
    • It requires more optimization. It tends to make the PCs slower.
    • It almost doesn't have the ability to heal. This is very important as we need our sensitive data to be recoverable.
    • It doesn't have any free scanning functionality. Our users using personal machines cannot scan in case of an incident. This could be added like Malwarebytes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    I think it is very easy for the end user once it's applied. On the configuration side, there's a learning curve to that, but there's always a learning curve for anything. So I think the product does what it needs to do. It is easy enough to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    So below is my breakdown, Pro's: Centralized Management, Comprehensive Protection and customization. Con's: Initial cost
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    The support of product was very good when we initially implemented the solution. We were getting fats replies and could see the customer approach. After a while the level of support was not following the SLA's and the replies were getting very confusing and late.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Symantec or now? Brocom. Forcepoint, GPV. I'm trying to think of, there's a couple more. I can't think of the top of my head. I would say closer to the bottom then rather than the top. So because of the fact that yes, it integrates well. But in terms of the actual functionality of DLP, there are other requirements that they just don't have the features for yet.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    Unlike Trellix Endpoint Security Symantec Endpoint provides less information about events on the user side. Trellix give an opportunity to see information about virus detection on a user machine as quick as it possible, so we were able to catch the signs of virus propagation early and prevent the spread of damage
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • From an ROI perspective, being able to have a robust DLP capability within 365 and with eShare, again, providing the defensive depth and keeping data 365 gives both us as well as our customers an ROI by being able to not use third party repositories to share data externally and by keeping data inside of 365. It gives me much more visibility into my data landscape. One of the things we advise our customers to do when they're starting to explore the advanced capabilities of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, for example, is to use that DLP product to monitor and understand the flows of sensitive data within the organization. By being able to look at that DLP, identify those sensitive niche types, and see which transactions occur internally within the organization, I get a clearer picture of what I'm doing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    • From an auditing standpoint, we can show that our workstations/servers are protected.
    • Even though it cant identify more advanced/targeted malware, it is still good to identify the more obvious malware which occurs daily in my enterprise.
    • Since it can be easily deployed, the products can easily get deployed on all systems in the environment for optimal anti-malware protection.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Screenshots

    Screenshot of pre-built policy templates to easily get startedScreenshot of DLP analytics to help recommend new policies and fine tune existing onesScreenshot of the step that enables one policy to be applied to several locationsScreenshot of then next step, that enables policies to be scoped to specific users and user groupsScreenshot of composite conditions using groups of AND /OR and exceptions with NOTScreenshot of granular restrictions for different actions

    Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Screenshots

    Screenshot of The Monitoring workspace presents actionable endpoint threat detection without the noise.Screenshot of Automatically identify the key findings without requiring manual evaluation of each individual artifact.Screenshot of Visualization displays relationships and speeds analyst understanding.Screenshot of AI-guided investigations automatically provide answers to typical questions asked during a security incident and highlight the most relevant evidence.