TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    monday dev

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/Amonday dev is a product to plan, track, and ship software while staying connected to the business, featuring AI capabilities that allow it to analyze bugs as they are submitted, summarize product documents, and automatically assign tasks.

    $36

    per month 3 seats (minimum)

    OpenText ALM/Quality Center

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AOpenTextâ„¢ ALM/Quality Center, formerly from Micro Focus, serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps users to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes.N/A
    Pricing
    monday devOpenText ALM/Quality Center
    Editions & Modules
    Basic
    $12
    per month per seat
    Standard
    $14.5
    per month per seat
    Pro
    $25
    per month per seat
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    monday devOpenText ALM/Quality Center
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPlans start at 3 seats. Yearly save 18%—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    monday devOpenText ALM/Quality Center
    Considered Both Products
    monday.com
    No answer on this topic
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    13 Answers
    83%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    9 Answers
    80%
    Delivers good value for the price
    4 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    13 Answers
    83%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    90%
    Implementation went as expected
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    monday devOpenText ALM/Quality Center
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of monday dev and OpenText ALM/Quality Center
    Feature
    monday dev
    7.8
    11 Ratings
    5% above category average
    OpenText ALM/Quality Center
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management8.411 Ratings00 Ratings
    Resource Management8.411 Ratings00 Ratings
    Gantt Charts7.710 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scheduling7.311 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Agile Methodology7.210 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Waterfall Methodology7.310 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document Management7.610 Ratings00 Ratings
    Email integration8.49 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access8.19 Ratings00 Ratings
    Timesheet Tracking7.99 Ratings00 Ratings
    Change request and Case Management7.99 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budget and Expense Management8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Search8.010 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visual planning tools7.411 Ratings00 Ratings
    Agile Development
    Comparison of Agile Development features of monday dev and OpenText ALM/Quality Center
    Feature
    monday dev
    7.5
    11 Ratings
    2% below category average
    OpenText ALM/Quality Center
    -
    Ratings
    DevOps Tool Integrations7.910 Ratings00 Ratings
    Code Review8.56 Ratings00 Ratings
    Code Collaboration6.87 Ratings00 Ratings
    Velocity Calculation7.28 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dependencies and Blockers7.010 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    monday devOpenText ALM/Quality Center
    Small Businesses
    Pivotal Tracker
    Score5 out of 10
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Planview AgilePlace
    Score7.5 out of 10
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Planview AgilePlace
    Score7.5 out of 10
    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Score5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    monday devOpenText ALM/Quality Center
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (13 ratings)
    7.1
    (31 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.9
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    7.9
    (13 ratings)
    3.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    7.4
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    monday devOpenText ALM/Quality Center
    Likelihood to Recommend
    monday.com
    I find Monday helpful for lead management. It's great because details like phone, email, and addresses are specific columns from which we can grab data and pull it into other areas. It's great to see who is assigned what and to know what the next steps are for your leads. We use a different scheduling tool with our team, as that calendar view isn't as robust.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    For an organisation that has completely adopted SAFe structure including naming terminology, it is less appropriate and apart from that. It can suit any organisation out there, and it can solve all your problems one way or another by customising it. It is a robust and highly scalable solution to support all the business needs. It improves a lot of productivity and visibility.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    monday.com
    • Managing specific objectives
    • Automation
    • Integration and interaction with GitHub
    • Scheduling and feedback effectively
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • If you have a mix of automation & manual test suites, HPALM is the best tool to manage that. It definitely integrates very well with HP automation tools like HP Unified Functional Testing and HP LoadRunner. Automated Suites can be executed, reports can be maintained automatically. It also classifies which test suites are manual & which are automated & managers can see the progress happening in moving from manual to automated suites. In HPA ALM all the functional test suites, performance test suites, security suites can be defined, managed & tracked in one place.
    • It is a wonderful tool for test management. Whether you want to create test cases, or import it, from execution to snapshot capturing, it supports all activities very well. The linking of defects to test runs is excellent. Any changes in mandatory fields or status of the defect triggers an e-mail and sent automatically to the user that the defect is assigned to.
    • It also supports devops implementation by interacting with development tool sets such as Jenkins & GIT. It also bring in team collaboration by supporting collaboration tools like Slack and Hubot.
    • This tool can integrate to any environment, any source control management tool bringing in changes and creates that trace-ability and links between source control changes to requirements to tests across the sdlc life-cycle.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    monday.com
    • Sometimes, it's a little technical to set up. Someone who isn't particularly savvy will have a hard time setting it up.
    • Sometimes there are glitches in the automations.
    • The comments areas can be confusing- how they nest. Things can get lost in there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • The requirements module is not as user friendly as other applications, such as Blue Bird. Managing requirements is usually done in another tool. However, having the requirements in ALM is important to ensure traceability to tests and defects.
    • Reporting across multiple ALM repositories is not supported within the tool. Only graphs are included within ALM functionality. Due to size considerations, one or two projects is not a good solution. Alternatively, we have started leveraging the template functionality within ALM and are integrating with a third party reporting tool to work around this issue.
    • NET (not Octane) requires a package for deployment to machines without administrative rights. Every time there is a change, a new package must be created, which increases the time to deploy. It also forces us to wait until multiple patches have been provided before updating production.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    monday.com
    We are very likely to renew, because it has been really useful
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    I like the ease to use and its reliable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    monday.com
    I give a ten for monday dev's usability because it was a really smooth transition coming from Jira to monday dev. All team members also felt that way. When managing projects, the quality and various options I am able to customize views and columns for each task is really a dealbreaker. Approved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Because it lets me track the test cases with detailed scenarios and is clearly separated in folders. Also the defect filter helps me filter only the ones that have been assigned to a particular area of interest. The availability of reports lets me see the essentials fields which I might be missing the data on and helps me to work on these instead of having to go through everything.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    monday.com
    Good engagement from account manager
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    It is a great tool, however, it got this rating because there is a lot of learning that takes a lot longer than other tools. There are no mobile versions of ALM even with just a project summary view. I believe ALM is well capable of integration with other analytics tools that can help business solutions prediction based on current and past project data. This is Data held in ALM but with no other use apart from human reading and project progress. ALM looks like a steady platform that I believe can handle more dynamic functionality. You could add an internal communication platform that is not a third party. Limit that communication tool to specific project members.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    monday.com
    No I wasn't involved
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    monday.com
    It is at least as good as these tools, in many ways, it is better because it is easier to use and setup. It doesn't require a full-time admin like these tools do. It does lack some of the detailed reporting and such that these offer, but the product is still young and growing. These are much more well-developed tools
    Read full review
    OpenText
    We have other tools in our organization like Atlassian JIRA and Microsoft Team Foundation Server, which are very capable tools but very narrow in their approach and feature set and does not come even close to the some of the core capabilities of HP ALM. HP ALM is the "System of Record" in our organization. It gives visibility for an artifact throughout the delivery chain, which cut downs unnecessary bottlenecks and noise during releases.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    monday.com
    • Although the initial operational cost is usually somewhat high, it is really worth considering in an environment with more than 10 employees working together.
    • In project costing (web development) it is quite acceptable and falls within the scope of the final product quote.
    • I don't have exact numbers or percentages (because I'm not in charge of that section) but I can say that it falls within a good to acceptable ROI range.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • ALM/QC has allowed for quick, traceable turnaround on relatively simple tasks
    • ALM/QC allows us to achieve our business objective of always being able to refer to a documented ticket for work being done.
    • ALM/QC navigation is not the easiest, so this aspect of the product has caused great frustration among new users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots