TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    MongoDB Atlas

    Score7.7 out of 10
    N/AMongoDB Atlas is the company's automated managed cloud service, supplying automated deployment, provisioning and patching, and other features supporting database monitoring and optimization.

    $57

    per month

    RavenDB

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/ARavenDB is a NoSQL Document Database that is fully transactional (ACID) across the database and throughout clusters. The database minimizes the need for third party addons, tools, or support to boost developer productivity and get projects into production fast. Users can setup and secure a data cluster deploy in the cloud, on-premise or in a hybrid environment. RavenDB offers a Database as a Service solution, allowing users to pass on all…N/A
    Pricing
    MongoDB AtlasRavenDB
    Editions & Modules
    Dedicated Clusters
    $57
    per month
    Dedicated Multi-Reigon Clusters
    $95
    per month
    Shared Clusters
    Free
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    MongoDB AtlasRavenDB
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    MongoDB AtlasRavenDB
    Considered Both Products
    MongoDB
    No answer on this topic
    RavenDB
    Chose RavenDB
    Much better support, more transparent pricing, much more easy setup process, native integration into c# / net core. We also tried to set up a Mongo Atlas cluster by self-study but weren't able to get this running. There is a much better response when searching in google, but a …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    95%
    Would buy again
    18 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    18 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    19 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    14 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    5 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    16 Answers
    Features
    MongoDB AtlasRavenDB
    Database-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Database-as-a-Service features of MongoDB Atlas and RavenDB
    Feature
    MongoDB Atlas
    8.9
    6 Ratings
    5% above category average
    RavenDB
    -
    Ratings
    Automatic software patching9.16 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database scalability9.96 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated backups9.96 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database security provisions9.16 Ratings00 Ratings
    Monitoring and metrics6.56 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic host deployment9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of MongoDB Atlas and RavenDB
    Feature
    MongoDB Atlas
    -
    Ratings
    RavenDB
    9.1
    24 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Performance00 Ratings9.024 Ratings
    Availability00 Ratings8.923 Ratings
    Concurrency00 Ratings8.023 Ratings
    Security00 Ratings9.223 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings9.623 Ratings
    Data model flexibility00 Ratings9.924 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings9.423 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    MongoDB AtlasRavenDB
    Small Businesses
    Google BigQuery
    Score8.8 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Azure Database
    Score8.8 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Cloud SQL
    Score8.7 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    MongoDB AtlasRavenDB
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.3
    (6 ratings)
    8.1
    (24 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.5
    (5 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (20 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.1
    (21 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    MongoDB AtlasRavenDB
    Likelihood to Recommend
    MongoDB
    It is good if you: 1. Have unstructured data that you need to save (since it is NoSQL DB) 2. You don't have time or knowledge to setup the MongoDB Atlas, the managed service is the way to go (Atlas) 3. If you need a multi regional DB across the world
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RavenDB
    If you're a.NET developer searching for a system other than SQL Server for business assessment, then you must try RavenDB. RavenDB is a fantastic document-oriented system that has been specifically developed to work with all.NET or Windows systems. Developers are continually working on such systems to eliminate their flaws while also providing a few benefits. We must refresh ourselves on a regular basis since the free software system is like an open area where anybody may stand up with a brilliant solution to the issue. RavenDB is absolutely worth a look
    Read full review
    Pros
    MongoDB
    • Generous free and trial plan for evaluation or test purposes.
    • New versions of MongoDB are able to be deployed with Atlas as soon as they're released—deploying recent versions to other services can be difficult or risky.
    • As the key supporters of the open source MongoDB project, the service runs in a highly optimized and performant manner, making it much easier than having to do the work internally.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RavenDB
    • Document Database - no Object-Relational Impedance Mismatch
    • ACID support that is optimized for performance
    • Can be easily integrated into automated tests (unit tests)
    • Easily configurable via C# code
    • Comes directly with RavenStudio - no SSMS or SQL Developer required
    • In general low footprint when it comes to memory and disk consumption
    • Useful safety nets for new developers - e.g. by default an exception is thrown when you make too many requests within a session
    Read full review
    Cons
    MongoDB
    • For someone new, it could be challenging using MongoDB Atlas. Some official video tutorials could help a lot
    • Pricing calculation is sometimes misleading and unpredictable, maybe better variables could be used to provide better insights about the cost
    • Since it is a managed service, we have limited control over the instances and some issues we faced we couldn't;'t know about without reaching out to the support and got fixed from their end. So more control over the instance might help
    • The way of managing users and access is somehow confusing. Maybe it could be placed somewhere easy to access
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RavenDB
    • The documentation is very good, but it's sometimes hard to find the topic I'm looking for.
    • Updating references is done manually. It would be nice if there was a feature to help with that. I'm not sure that's even possible though.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    MongoDB
    No answers on this topic
    RavenDB
    We've had an excellent experience using RavenDB. Internally we are testing the newer features in 5.0 such as time series, which will effect the con specified previously dependent on the real world performance. We foresee that BattleCrate will continue to use RavenDB as we grow.
    Read full review
    Usability
    MongoDB
    I would give it 8. Good stuff: 1. Easy to use in terms of creating cluster, integrating with Databases, setting up backups and high availability instance, using the monitors they provide to check cluster status, managing users at company level, configure multiple replicas and cross region databases. Things hard to use: 1. roles and permissions at DB level. 2. Calculate expected costs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RavenDB
    Really good .NET client that is very easy to use. The management studio is excellent and puts anything that Microsoft or Oracle have to shame. Very quick to develop with once the complexity hurdle has been overcome. Initially using it can be a bit painful until you fully grasp the event sourced nature of the indexing.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    MongoDB
    We love MongoDB support and have great relationship with them. When we decided to go with MongoDB Atlas, they sent a team of 5 to our company to discuss the process of setting up a Mongo cluster and walked us through. when we have questions, we create a ticket and they will respond very quickly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RavenDB
    The support is really fast and flexible. Since one single working day, we got a response to our first request, only 4 days later we got a technical demonstration for our complete developer team to get in touch with raven and its performance. Also during our development, we got a quick response to questions.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    MongoDB
    No answers on this topic
    RavenDB
    RavenFS changed along the way and made us change the codes.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    MongoDB
    MongoDB is a great product but on premise deployments can be slow. So we turned to Atlas. We also looked at Redis Labs and we use Redis as our side cache for app servers. But we love using MongoDB Atlas for cloud deployments, especially for prototyping because we can get started immediately. And the cost is low and easy to justify.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RavenDB
    The given alternatives are also powerful and really good noSQL databases but the highest availability of RavenDB allows me/us to know it a lot better. RavenDB is encrypted by default wherever we use it in production and it has a high level of documents compression.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    MongoDB
    • Positive - Faster provisioning so we don't have development teams waiting.
    • Positive - Automated backups and server management - eliminates need for dedicated DBAs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    RavenDB
    • RavenDB has saved my customers a lot of money with their cloud services' tiered model. The database is able to grow with the project/company and can start out small at a low cost.
    • RavenDB is free for three nodes and three CPUs, which makes it great for development scenarios. You're able to start rapidly building applications without having to worry about licensing.
    • Scaling out has allowed us to use three small cloud servers when starting out and get the performance and throughput of a single larger server.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots