MongoDB Atlas vs. RavenDB

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
MongoDB Atlas
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
MongoDB Atlas is the company's automated managed cloud service, supplying automated deployment, provisioning and patching, and other features supporting database monitoring and optimization.
$57
per month
RavenDB
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
RavenDB is a NoSQL Document Database that is fully transactional (ACID) across the database and throughout clusters. It is presented as an easy to use all-in-one database that minimizes the need for third party addons, tools, or support to boost developer productivity and get projects into production fast. Users can setup and secure a data cluster deploy in the cloud, on…N/A
Pricing
MongoDB AtlasRavenDB
Editions & Modules
Dedicated Clusters
$57
per month
Dedicated Multi-Reigon Clusters
$95
per month
Shared Clusters
Free
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MongoDB AtlasRavenDB
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MongoDB AtlasRavenDB
Considered Both Products
MongoDB Atlas

No answer on this topic

RavenDB
Chose RavenDB
Much better support, more transparent pricing, much more easy setup process, native integration into c# / net core. We also tried to set up a Mongo Atlas cluster by self-study but weren't able to get this running. There is a much better response when searching in google, but a …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
MongoDB AtlasRavenDB
Database-as-a-Service
Comparison of Database-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
MongoDB Atlas
9.3
5 Ratings
6% above category average
RavenDB
-
Ratings
Automatic software patching9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
Database scalability9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated backups9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
Database security provisions9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring and metrics9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic host deployment9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
MongoDB Atlas
-
Ratings
RavenDB
9.1
24 Ratings
4% above category average
Performance00 Ratings9.024 Ratings
Availability00 Ratings8.923 Ratings
Concurrency00 Ratings8.023 Ratings
Security00 Ratings9.223 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings9.623 Ratings
Data model flexibility00 Ratings9.924 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings9.423 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MongoDB AtlasRavenDB
Small Businesses
SingleStore
SingleStore
Score 9.8 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SingleStore
SingleStore
Score 9.8 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
SingleStore
SingleStore
Score 9.8 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MongoDB AtlasRavenDB
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(5 ratings)
8.2
(24 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(5 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(20 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(2 ratings)
8.2
(21 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
MongoDB AtlasRavenDB
Likelihood to Recommend
MongoDB
I would recommend MongoDB Atlas to every company who have a significant need in the NoSQL database and do not want to manage their infrastructure. Using MongoDB Atlas can significantly reduce your management time and cost, which saves valuable resources for other tasks. It also suits a smaller company as MongoDB Atlas scales up and down very quickly.
Read full review
Hibernating Rhinos
If you're a.NET developer searching for a system other than SQL Server for business assessment, then you must try RavenDB. RavenDB is a fantastic document-oriented system that has been specifically developed to work with all.NET or Windows systems. Developers are continually working on such systems to eliminate their flaws while also providing a few benefits. We must refresh ourselves on a regular basis since the free software system is like an open area where anybody may stand up with a brilliant solution to the issue. RavenDB is absolutely worth a look
Read full review
Pros
MongoDB
  • DB Provisioning.
  • DB Management.
Read full review
Hibernating Rhinos
  • Document Database - no Object-Relational Impedance Mismatch
  • ACID support that is optimized for performance
  • Can be easily integrated into automated tests (unit tests)
  • Easily configurable via C# code
  • Comes directly with RavenStudio - no SSMS or SQL Developer required
  • In general low footprint when it comes to memory and disk consumption
  • Useful safety nets for new developers - e.g. by default an exception is thrown when you make too many requests within a session
Read full review
Cons
MongoDB
  • As an independent entity, MongoDB Atlas is not included in existing subscriptions from AWS or Azure, requiring an additional support plan and reliance on a third party.
Read full review
Hibernating Rhinos
  • The documentation is very good, but it's sometimes hard to find the topic I'm looking for.
  • Updating references is done manually. It would be nice if there was a feature to help with that. I'm not sure that's even possible though.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
MongoDB
No answers on this topic
Hibernating Rhinos
We've had an excellent experience using RavenDB. Internally we are testing the newer features in 5.0 such as time series, which will effect the con specified previously dependent on the real world performance. We foresee that BattleCrate will continue to use RavenDB as we grow.
Read full review
Usability
MongoDB
No answers on this topic
Hibernating Rhinos
Really good .NET client that is very easy to use. The management studio is excellent and puts anything that Microsoft or Oracle have to shame. Very quick to develop with once the complexity hurdle has been overcome. Initially using it can be a bit painful until you fully grasp the event sourced nature of the indexing.
Read full review
Support Rating
MongoDB
We love MongoDB support and have great relationship with them. When we decided to go with MongoDB Atlas, they sent a team of 5 to our company to discuss the process of setting up a Mongo cluster and walked us through. when we have questions, we create a ticket and they will respond very quickly
Read full review
Hibernating Rhinos
The support is really fast and flexible. Since one single working day, we got a response to our first request, only 4 days later we got a technical demonstration for our complete developer team to get in touch with raven and its performance. Also during our development, we got a quick response to questions.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
MongoDB
No answers on this topic
Hibernating Rhinos
RavenFS changed along the way and made us change the codes.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
MongoDB
MongoDB Atlas has been in the market for very long time and there are bunch of documentation, training and support for it. It also is specifically designed for the use case similar to our project and big companies in the market uses them for very high load which made us confident about our choice.
Read full review
Hibernating Rhinos
The given alternatives are also powerful and really good noSQL databases but the highest availability of RavenDB allows me/us to know it a lot better. RavenDB is encrypted by default wherever we use it in production and it has a high level of documents compression.
Read full review
Return on Investment
MongoDB
  • Improved our maintainability
  • Reduced daily work compared to self-hosted solutions
  • Reasonable pricing compared to value
Read full review
Hibernating Rhinos
  • RavenDB has saved my customers a lot of money with their cloud services' tiered model. The database is able to grow with the project/company and can start out small at a low cost.
  • RavenDB is free for three nodes and three CPUs, which makes it great for development scenarios. You're able to start rapidly building applications without having to worry about licensing.
  • Scaling out has allowed us to use three small cloud servers when starting out and get the performance and throughput of a single larger server.
Read full review
ScreenShots