Neo4j vs. QuestDB

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Neo4j
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Neo4j is an open source embeddable graph database developed by Neo Technologies based in San Mateo, California with an office in Sweden.
$65
per month
QuestDB
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
QuestDB is an open source time series database. It implements SQL and exposes a Postgres wire protocol, a REST API, and supports ingestion with InfluxDB line protocol.N/A
Pricing
Neo4jQuestDB
Editions & Modules
Aura Professional
$65
per month
Community Edition
Free
Enterprise Edition
Contact Sales
Aura Free
Free
Aura Enterprise
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Neo4jQuestDB
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
Neo4jQuestDB
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.9 out of 10
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Neo4jQuestDB
Likelihood to Recommend
2.1
(9 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Neo4jQuestDB
Likelihood to Recommend
Neo Technologies
Neo4J is great for creating network graphs or illustrating how things are related. It is also good for finding individuals or things that have greater influence than others in a system. It is not appropriate if you have standard data sets that can be analyzed using conventional methods or visualized using Tableau, for example.
Read full review
QuestDB
QuestDB is well suited for any use case where you need to store large amount of data and the performance is the key factor - for both reads and writes. So use cases like market data storage in financial industry, any kind of telemetry, etc.
Read full review
Pros
Neo Technologies
  • Mature Query language, I found Cypher QL to be mature in handling all sorts of problems we throw at it. Its expressive enough to be intuitive while providing rich features for various scenarios.
  • Native support for REST API, that makes interacting with Neo4J intuitive and easy.
  • Support for Procedures in Java, procedures are custom code that could be added to the Neo4J to write custom querying of data. The best part about the procedures is it could be invoked using the REST API. This allows us to overcome any shortcomings from their Cypher query language.
  • Nice UI and interface for executing the Query and visualizing the response.
  • UI access controlled by User credentials allows for neat access controls.
  • Awesome free community edition for small-scale projects.
Read full review
QuestDB
  • Extreme performance.
  • Super easy to use.
  • Compatibility with Influx line protocol.
  • PostgreSQL compatibility.
  • Out of order timestamps.
  • Support for multiple records with same timestamp.
  • Integration with Grafana.
  • Team responsiveness.
Read full review
Cons
Neo Technologies
  • One of the hardest challenges that Neo4j had to solve was the horizontal scaling problem. I am not updated on recent developments, but at the time of my use, I couldn't find a viable solution.
  • Neo4j does not play with other open source APIs like Blueprint. You have to use the native Neo4j API.
  • There wasn't a visual tool to see your data. Of course, third party tools are always available, but I would have loved something which came with the Neo4j bundle. I love that Docker comes bundled with Kitematic, so it's not wrong to hope that Neo4j could also ship with some default visualization software.
Read full review
QuestDB
  • New project so needs a bit polishing.
Read full review
Usability
Neo Technologies
[Based on] Query Language, Performance on small and large data sets, integration and deployment, analysis, API support, Interactive UI.
Read full review
QuestDB
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Neo Technologies
Neo4j is a graph store and has different use cases compared to another NoSQL Document store like MongoDB. MongoDB is a bad choice when joins are common as existing operators for joining two documents (similar to tables in a relational store) as Mongo 3.5 use SQL like join algorithms which are expensive. MongoDB is a great choice when distributed schemaless rich document structures are important requirements. Cross document transaction support is not native to MongoDB yet, whereas Neo4J is ACID complaint with all its operations.
Read full review
QuestDB
We were looking for time series database that will be able to handle L2 market data and came across QuestDB. From the beginning we were impressed how well the QuestDB performs and that it actually significantly outperforms all other open source TSDB on market like InfluxDB, ClickHouse, Timescale, etc. Apart from the excellent performance it is also super easy to use and deploy which makes the experience of using the database very pleasant - we were able to be up and running and storing data within few hours. Topic itself is the QuestDB team that is super responsive on their slack channel and always ready to help with any query. They are constantly improving the product and if there is some missing feature that is blocking you from usage they always try the best to implement such feature asap and release a new version - one of the best support I have ever seen so far in open source community.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Neo Technologies
  • Positive: Less complex queries on graph structures, than in relational databases.
  • Negative: maintenance is a huge deal, things doesn't work and break, requiring lengthy restore operations.
Read full review
QuestDB
  • Reduced cost.
  • Increased efficiency.
  • Faster time to market.
Read full review
ScreenShots

QuestDB Screenshots

Screenshot of Fast SQL for time seriesScreenshot of Console to query and visualize dataF