LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester vs. Pulseway
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester | Score10 out of 10 | N/A | The LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester offers user-configured AutoTests for a wide range of tasks. This network tester’s cable test and switch identification facilitate problem isolation. The device is supported by netAlly after NETSCOUT divested its handheld troubleshooting devices in 2018. The LinkRunner device replaces the former and now obsolete OneTouch AT network troubleshooting technology acquired from Seattle-based Fluke Networks by NETSCOUT in 2015. | N/A |
Pulseway | Score7 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Pulseway is an IT monitoring and management solution that enables users to monitor, manage and control all systems and servers from a smartphone, tablet or browser. For system administrators, Pulseway sends a notification, so they can see an issue and sort it in seconds. Pulseway features: Automation: Auto-remediation workflows, so that IT issues are fixed before users even notice them. Mobile Access: Customers can monitor, manage, connect with… | $0.80 per month per installation |
| LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester | Pulseway | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | No hidden fees or contracts. Term-based discounts. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester | Pulseway | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 60% Would buy again 3 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Happy with the feature set 4 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | |
| LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester | Pulseway | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Panda Systems Management Score7.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Cisco Catalyst Assurance Score8.1 out of 10 | N-able N-sight RMM Score7.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Cisco Catalyst Assurance Score8.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester | Pulseway | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 6.4 |
| Usability | 10.0 | 7.8 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.6 |
| LinkRunner AT Network AutoTester | Pulseway | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Pulseway Screenshots |









