Spot by NetApp vs. ShareGate

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Spot by NetApp
Score 6.6 out of 10
N/A
Spot by NetApp, now including CloudCheckr, helps companies to run their cloud investments. The Spot product suite uses machine learning and analytics to automate and optimize cloud infrastructure, to ensure that workloads and applications always have the best possible infrastructure that is available, scalable and available at the lowest possible cost. Spot’s technology provides insights into cloud costs, recommendations for how to optimize utilization and costs, and automation to implement…N/A
ShareGate
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
ShareGate headquartered in Montreal offers a suite of Sharepoint, Microsoft Office 365, and Azure adoption, administration, and cost management solutions.
$5,995
per year
Pricing
Spot by NetAppShareGate
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
ShareGate Protect
$1995
per year
Migrate Essentials
$5,995
per year 1 machine activation for essential migrations
Migrate Pro
$9,995
per year 5 machine activation for essential migrations
Migrate Enterprise
$17,995
per year 25 machine activation for essential migrations
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Spot by NetAppShareGate
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Spot by NetAppShareGate
Cloud Management
Comparison of Cloud Management features of Product A and Product B
Spot by NetApp
9.0
1 Ratings
4% above category average
ShareGate
-
Ratings
Cloud Management Security9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Automation and Orchestration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Management Performance Monitoring9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Governance and Compliance9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Systems Integration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Spot by NetAppShareGate
Small Businesses
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.1 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 8.4 out of 10
IBM Cloud for VMware Solutions
IBM Cloud for VMware Solutions
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Spot by NetAppShareGate
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(3 ratings)
9.2
(4 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Spot by NetAppShareGate
Likelihood to Recommend
NetApp
CloudCheckr is fantastic for those that are purely in the Cloud as it provides everything you need under one roof for a comprehensive configuration and usage monitoring tool. It has SysLog capabilities though so you can farm out the alerts into a SIEM or other log management system, so hybrid environments could also benefit from its use.
Read full review
Workleap
Migrations from one 365 tenant to another are so easy with Sharegate that there is little work to prepare and post-check. This tool is very user friendly and if you understand SharePoint you can understand Sharegate. One other feature I like about Sharegate is that you can migrate parts of SharePoint and not just the whole thing!
Read full review
Pros
NetApp
  • Detailed Best Practices. It's important to align your cloud to industry best practices for security and cost—it just performs better if it's used the way it's meant to be used. AWS is very flexible, and that's great when you have special requirements, but you've got to at least know when you're using something in a non-standard way so you can think through the implications.
  • Cost Reduction. Some recommendations are almost impossible to make at least for our setup, but many, many others are easy. We only have to log into CloudCheckr every few months and make a few changes for it to more than pay for itself.
  • Right-Sizing. This is related to the other points, but for some reason is separate from their cost module. The metrics it's able to pull only tell half the story, so it's good to verify it's sizing recommendations before making changes. But it does show you what instances to focus on first, and even if you choose a slightly different size to move it to, it does clearly indicate it's current size isn't appropriate. And this works both ways, if the size is too big, you can save some cash by making it smaller, but if it's too small, you want to be sure to scale up before you run into performance problems.
Read full review
Workleap
  • Scheduled migrations
  • Migration speed
  • Handles O365 throttling
  • Incremental migrations
Read full review
Cons
NetApp
  • CloudCheckr features have a tendency to break without warning. Functionality in place for months could suddenly stop working.
  • CloudCheckr support often delays work on support tickets for fixing broken application functionality.
  • The CloudCheckr platform and documentation website often crash or experience performance degradation.
  • CloudCheckr cost reporting is often impacted by faulty code or broken report functionality. This can contribute to a low level of confidence in CloudCheckr's ability to deliver accurate cost reporting.
Read full review
Workleap
  • Error messaging unclear
  • Preserving list item IDs difficult
  • Migrating content types and site columns is difficult with same name
  • Licensing should be less restrictive
Read full review
Usability
NetApp
Overall, CloudCheckr covers all our AWS monitoring needs and great integration through SysLog into our SIEM to capture alerts for investigation. The reports are great and allow for an easy daily review. Small improvements could be made to the interface and better filtering in places would be good. Great product and the price is fair.
Read full review
Workleap
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
NetApp
Fantastic Support team who are responsive and address question and concerns promptly with a thorough explanation and fast resolution.
Read full review
Workleap
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
NetApp
There are a few products out there that'll do an aspect or two of what CloudCheckr does, but I honestly couldn't find anything nearly as comprehensive as CloudCheckr.
Read full review
Workleap
Sharegate has the feature set at the price point we needed
Read full review
Return on Investment
NetApp
  • CloudCheckr has allowed us to increase resell margins as an MSP.
  • CloudCheckr has made us aware of cost savings opportunities that exceed the price of the platform itself.
  • CloudCheckr has given us additional visibility that has allowed us to manage and understand cloud computing costs.
Read full review
Workleap
  • Time saved on migrations
  • Improved security of SP sites with permissions reports
  • Version clean up with Sharegate clean up process
Read full review
ScreenShots

ShareGate Screenshots

Screenshot of the ShareGate migration tool – from migration to content management, it is used to migrate to Microsoft 365, move channels in Teams, and merge tenants.Screenshot of the Permissions Matrix Report used to validate, monitor and manage permissions for internal and external users. It is also used to audit permissions security without scripting, or update permissions in bulk.Screenshot of the built-in and custom reports that offer an overview of SharePoint and Teams inventory. They display what exists, and who created it.Screenshot of the team management interface, used to manage a SharePoint team and communication sites without PowerShell scripts. It is also used to build governance policies, and automatically spot risks, gaps and clutter.Screenshot of a display of who can do what in the SharePoint environment. From the interface, users can copy and edit permissions in bulk, control and review external sharing and guest access, or delegate control to owners to review, without leaving Teams.Screenshot of the interface where users can provision their workspaces using templates, with guardrails in place – like minimum owners, blueprint sites, naming conventions, multiple approvers, and privacy level.