Netlify CMS vs. OpenText Web CMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Netlify CMS
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Netlify CMS is an open source Git-based CMS for static site generators. it runs 100% in a browser.N/A
OpenText Web CMS
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Web CMS (TeamSite) accelerates and simplifies the end-to-end digital content and campaign lifecycle, from content creation and rich media management to omnichannel publication, optimization, automation, commerce, and community. According to the vendor, with TeamSite, users can: Capture diverse digital audiences with amazing brand experiences – Give customers and prospects consistent, high-quality brand experiences across devices and channels, and foster closer…N/A
Pricing
Netlify CMSOpenText Web CMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Netlify CMSOpenText Web CMS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Netlify CMSOpenText Web CMS
Features
Netlify CMSOpenText Web CMS
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Netlify CMS
6.0
1 Ratings
25% below category average
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
7 Ratings
2% above category average
API6.01 Ratings8.76 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings7.26 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Netlify CMS
6.1
1 Ratings
24% below category average
OpenText Web CMS
8.0
7 Ratings
3% above category average
WYSIWYG editor9.01 Ratings7.87 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness9.01 Ratings7.76 Ratings
Admin section7.01 Ratings8.17 Ratings
Page templates3.01 Ratings7.46 Ratings
Library of website themes1.01 Ratings8.36 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design5.01 Ratings8.37 Ratings
Publishing workflow9.01 Ratings8.17 Ratings
Form generator00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Netlify CMS
4.3
1 Ratings
54% below category average
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
7 Ratings
6% above category average
Content taxonomy7.01 Ratings7.97 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions2.01 Ratings7.57 Ratings
Community / comment management4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Bulk management00 Ratings8.27 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Netlify CMS
-
Ratings
OpenText Web CMS
8.6
7 Ratings
5% above category average
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.67 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Netlify CMSOpenText Web CMS
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Netlify CMSOpenText Web CMS
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.4
(8 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
3.6
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Netlify CMSOpenText Web CMS
Likelihood to Recommend
Netlify
Netlify CMS is well suited when you have very less frequent updates to your content, maybe once a day and very few people need to access your data. You can connect it to Netlify, GitHub, or any platform and have multiple people access it and do as many updates as you wish, but the process is not well-defined and you need to build your own system for that. It is well suited for projects you need to pull off with very low cost, it is essentially free as the software is open source and free to use, and all you need to do is set up your schema correctly and find a deployment pipeline where you can build your static site/API to redeploy whenever the content changes. I personally used a GitHub Login -> Netlify CMS -> next app consumer of content -> GitHub pipelines to run next SSG -> GitHub Pages to deploy the built static site. It might not be appropriate for large teams where users themselves need no-code tools to modify the schema of the content.
Read full review
OpenText
OpenText TeamSite is well-suited to large, enterprise-wide implementations where customization, content governance, and dynamic content distribution is needed or prioritized. It is probably not ideal for smaller sites with simple architecture and few resources to manage custom implementation.
Read full review
Pros
Netlify
  • Storing content data in customized schema without a database
  • Full control over your content and infrastructure where it is deployed and stored
  • Very low-cost way for building your own CMS and CDN
Read full review
OpenText
  • The drag and drop forms feature makes publishing simple and quick.
  • Preview of customer data before sending publications helps us to deliver personalized experiences.
Read full review
Cons
Netlify
  • Linking between different schema types, i.e. having some relations between content
  • Better ways to define content schema, like how TinaCMS would handle using a JSON
Read full review
OpenText
  • I have recommendation for improvements.
  • It is easy to work with all the features.
  • All necessary content management tools are included.
Read full review
Usability
Netlify
No answers on this topic
OpenText
Overall, it's a solid package with the potential to offer much functionality with appropriate resources applied. There are a few issues with the authoring interface that OpenText should address before its a top shelf authoring experience.
Read full review
Support Rating
Netlify
No answers on this topic
OpenText
Our technical resources engage with OpenText TeamSite so I don't have direct experience. However, critical issues that we need help with seem to get the attention they deserve without issue. However, training and user resources for business owner roles are a bit lacking and some annoying issues with the authoring interface should be addressed sooner.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Netlify
We really can't compare it to full-fledged CMS software, like WordPress, which has a lot of community and support with widgets, plugins, and whatnot. It's not built for that, but you can compare it to Contentful, Ghost, Strapi, etc., which provide similar functionality to a headless CMS with custom schema options, but even among them, it still lacks a lot of functionality, ease of use, and support. But Netlify CMS pros would be of the opinion that compared to other platforms where most schemas need to use their own tools and frameworks, it's very cost-effective. Something new called TinaCMS has come up to compete with Netlify CMS by covering most of its shortcomings, but it's something new being built by the same team that built Forestry CMS and comes with many modern features, yet currently only supports NextJS SSG.
Read full review
OpenText
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training for working with their product.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Netlify
No answers on this topic
OpenText
The annual contract should be clearer in terms of the breakdown of user license types (system admin, admin, regular user, etc).
Read full review
Return on Investment
Netlify
  • Helped us inject dynamic content into existing site very quickly
  • Wasted a lot of time to implement when something complex, such as querying content, was needed
Read full review
OpenText
  • We integrated with google analytics, now we have the proper comprehension of our audience data reception and behaviors - we've greatly improved on personalized marketing.
  • Quick publication of content across the main digital channels.
  • We run our digital campaigns swiftly.
  • We've maintained our brand consistency for three years.
Read full review
ScreenShots