Netpeak Spider is a desktop tool which crawls a website like a search engine robot and detects key SEO issues that influence the website’s visibility in SERP. According to the vendor, this tool allows users to: Spot 80+ issues of your website optimization. Check 70+ key on-page SEO parameters. Calculate internal PageRank to improve website linking structure. Analyze all incoming and outgoing internal links. View page…
$19
per user
Textmetrics
Score6 out of 10
N/A
Textmetrics (formerly Webtexttool) aims to help content creators create rank-boosting web content. The tools key differentiator is big data Textmetrics creates predictive data, by analyzing the data of users (anonymously). 20.000+ user generated texts are analyzed and compared to real-world outcomes. The best performing outcomes are used to better its real-time optimization tips. Value prop: More website…
N/A
Pricing
Netpeak Spider
Textmetrics
Editions & Modules
Standard (1-month subscription)
$19.00
per user
Pro (1-month subscription)
$39.00
per user
Standard (12 months subscription)
$182.40
per user
Pro (12 months subscription)
$374.40
per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Netpeak Spider
Textmetrics
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$15.90 per user
No setup fee
Additional Details
Standard Plan includes all basic features except access to white-label reports.
Pro Plan gives you all basic features and access to white-label reports.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Netpeak Spider
Textmetrics
SEO
Comparison of SEO features of Netpeak Spider and Textmetrics
Feature
Netpeak Spider
9.0
1 Ratings
16% above category average
Textmetrics
9.7
2 Ratings
23% above category average
Page grader
8.01 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Site audit / diagnostics
10.01 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Keyword analysis
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Backlink management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Competitive analysis
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Site recommendations
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Task management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
SEO Channels
Comparison of SEO Channels features of Netpeak Spider and Textmetrics
Feature
Netpeak Spider
8.5
1 Ratings
11% above category average
Textmetrics
10.0
2 Ratings
27% above category average
Mobile SEO
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global SEO
9.01 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Local SEO
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
SEO Platform & Account Management
Comparison of SEO Platform & Account Management features of Netpeak Spider and Textmetrics
Checking and monitoring big websites or e-commerce projects for technical errors on regular basis
Creating custom formulas for calculation of internal page ranks and building a tree view with this information
Get reports that include metrics for every page (performance, inbound and outbound links, indexing status)
Create reports that include all metrics from external SEO services like Serpstat or Similarweb for every single page of your website
It's very useful software for SEO or marketing agencies that have a lot of projects to work with, but might be overkill for small projects and companies.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I honestly can't think of a scenario where WebTextTool (TextMetrics) would not be valuable for anyone writing content intended for publishing either online or in print media. If the intent is for print media, then even if you completely ignore the SEO section of the analysis, all of the other analysis tools intended for content are incredibly insightful and helpful. These days, even print media almost always ends up online in some form or another on the publisher's website or in a digital format of the publication. So the SEO tools can still give a little boost in reworking or rewording some parts to make sure they will be effective not only in print but online as well.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
WebTextTool (TextMetrics) assumes that each uploaded or typed in the article is intended for online publishing, mostly in a blog type environment. While this is a perfectly understandable assumption in this day and age, it shouldn't be so difficult to ask the question of whether the content is intended for online or print media.
The "Credibility" section tends to be a little too harsh for my taste. Depending on the style of writing and the type of content, "too many adjectives" is too subjective a metric to apply to all writing ( still, I do get why they try to do it).
This is a little nitpicky, but I'd prefer to see how many projects and credits I have left to use on the dashboard page as opposed to having to click over to my account. A dashboard should show everything that a user needs to see in one shot.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I only had to reach out to TexMetrics once when initially getting my account setup after signing up. The response was swift, and they addressed my question completely. I've had no other issues since I began using TextMetrics, so based on that one interaction, I have to give them a great score. I assume that it is still the same as when I reached out that one time (at least I hope it is!).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We choose Netpeak Spider because: 1. Can buy a monthly subscription and have unlimited number of websites to check. 2. Price. It's affordable, especially when you have not only one project. 3. Frequent updates. With every update functionality is expanding (latest update for example brought a lot of new integrations). 4. Quality of reports. They are very detailed and have everything we needed for our work.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info