NGINX vs. Twingate
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NGINX | Score9.1 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create… | N/A |
Twingate | Score9.9 out of 10 | N/A | Twingate allows businesses to secure remote access to their private applications, data, and environments, whether they are on-premise or in the cloud. Built to make the lives of DevOps teams, IT teams, and end users easier, it replaces outdated corporate VPNs which were not built to handle a world in which "work from anywhere" and cloud-based assets are increasingly the norm. Twingate’s modern zero trust-based approach to securing remote access focuses on improving security,… | $0 |
| NGINX | Twingate | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | An Enterprise Plan with customized pricing is also available. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | Twingate | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 49 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 45 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 50 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 34 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
96% Implementation went as expected 43 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| NGINX | Twingate | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | Twingate | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.3 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Red Hat JBoss EAP Score8.5 out of 10 | Forescout Vistaro Platform Score6.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| NGINX | Twingate | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.3 | 9.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | - |
| Usability | 8.3 | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | 9.5 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| NGINX | Twingate | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | NGINX Screenshots | Twingate Screenshots |













