TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces vs. TrueSight Automation for Servers

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Application Quality Management

    Score4 out of 10
    N/AReplacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management.N/A

    Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces

    Score9.9 out of 10
    N/ARed Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces is a Cloud Development Environment (CDE) platform built on the open-source Eclipse Che project. The solution provides developers with containerized, browser-accessible workspaces hosted directly within a Kubernetes/Red Hat OpenShift cluster.N/A

    TrueSight Automation for Servers

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/ABMC's TrueSight Automation for Servers (formerly under the BladeLogic Automation Suite) is a server lifecycle automation application supporting configuration, patching and maintaining physical, cloud and virtual servers.N/A
    Pricing
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementRed Hat OpenShift Dev SpacesTrueSight Automation for Servers
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementRed Hat OpenShift Dev SpacesTrueSight Automation for Servers
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementRed Hat OpenShift Dev SpacesTrueSight Automation for Servers
    Small Businesses
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    HashiCorp Vagrant
    Score9 out of 10
    Salt
    Score6.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    IBM Terraform
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Perforce Puppet
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    IBM Terraform
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Salt
    Score6.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementRed Hat OpenShift Dev SpacesTrueSight Automation for Servers
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (4 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementRed Hat OpenShift Dev SpacesTrueSight Automation for Servers
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    We have a team of 500 people so it's most reliable and scalable if any new joinees. That way user's can directly create their own workspace and start working and share the work stack throughout development teams securely, to update and modify any upcoming events. The best thing about Red Hat Workspace is it's simple, with all Runtime libraries pre-installed, so no need to request a platform from Azure or any other platform provider just log in and start creating a workspace. It has version control so can easily import GIT projects can start work without worrying we don't have Java, Python or any other platform not installed just select the platform needed and start working.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    It would be very good to backup multiple platforms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
    • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
    • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    BMC Helix
    • The backup process is simple and easy to learn and change.
    • It has the ability to manage multiple platforms.
    • It also can push configures to multiple devices at once.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
    • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Can improve UI like Visual studio so that VS user's can switch without any difficulty.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    • It would easier for users if there are more report templates.
    • The dashboard can be improved as well.
    • Otherwise, I am pretty happy with the tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    We will renew because it is part of our build process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    BMC Helix
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    BMC Helix
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • Better team coordination.
    • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
    • Better project management by having different work streams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • No need to request for any platform again and again.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    • Make my work more reliable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots