OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Application Quality Management
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Replacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management.N/A
Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Plastic was a version control system for facilitating branching, diffing and merging. It was acquired by Unity, and its features are part of Unity DevOps. The application is no longer available for sale.
$6.95
per user
Pricing
OpenText Application Quality ManagementPlastic, now part of Unity DevOps
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Cloud Edition
$6.95
per user
Team Edition (on prem)
$9.95
per user
Enterprise Edition
$23.25
per user
Enterprise Edition (perpetual)
$595.00
per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Application Quality ManagementPlastic, now part of Unity DevOps
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional Details* Educational institutions receive a substantial discount on Plastic SCM licensing fees * Corporate/volume pricing is available * For more information, please contact sales at sales@codicesoftware.com
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Application Quality ManagementPlastic, now part of Unity DevOps
Best Alternatives
OpenText Application Quality ManagementPlastic, now part of Unity DevOps
Small Businesses
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Application Quality ManagementPlastic, now part of Unity DevOps
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(4 ratings)
8.4
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.1
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Application Quality ManagementPlastic, now part of Unity DevOps
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
Plastic SCM is well suited for the distributed development environment, where branching and merging can easily be handled. Its a good tool for version controlling, especially for a big team which is contributing to a big project simultaneously. Situation where Plastic SCM is not at all well suited are : If the project is smaller one and need to be handled by couple of people. So in that case setting up Plastic SCM and educating people to work on it is not at all efficient
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
  • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
  • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Version Control
  • Organizing Workflow
  • Transparency
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
  • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Interface
  • Documentation
  • Learning curve
  • Unity integration
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
We will renew because it is part of our build process.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
Plastic has best integration with unity - zero issues, native, straightforward. GitHub feels more stable but for smaller and or indie teams plastic s version control feels much more under control - you click, you feel safe. moreover, there is no need for extra tools such as gitkraken, gitlab, Sourcetree, fork, etc. it is really easy to develop games this way.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • Better team coordination.
  • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
  • Better project management by having different work streams.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Easy to use
  • Cheap
  • Better than git for us
  • Artists love it
Read full review
ScreenShots

Plastic, now part of Unity DevOps Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of