TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. TrackWise

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Application Quality Management

    Score4 out of 10
    N/AReplacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management.N/A

    TrackWise

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/ASparta Systems headquartered in Hamilton offers TrackWise, a quality management system designed to allow the user to leverage existing investment to quickly implement a cost-effective quality management system. Also, TrackWise Digital helps users to track and manage internal, third-party, and regulatory audits.N/A
    Pricing
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementTrackWise
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementTrackWise
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementTrackWise
    Small Businesses
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    SmartSense by Digi (with Jolt)
    Score9.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    SmartSense by Digi (with Jolt)
    Score9.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Score5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementTrackWise
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.1
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Availability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText Application Quality ManagementTrackWise
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sparta Systems
    We use Trackwise to record non-conformances that are reported by our clients and also the non-conformances that are found within the manufacturing floor during the manufacturing process. TrackWise is extremely easy to use and can be customized as per user needs. It is easy to create records and define child-parent relationships in the software. Users can pull customized reports and they can create dashboards as per the business demands to make sure they can track non-conformance resolution cycle time. We use TrackWise in integration with SAP which makes the system accessible to a wider user base. It is not only used to record the non-conformances, but also the part disposition details in cases where a part is supposed to be delivered from the client to us and in cases where the part is delivered to suppliers. We also use TrackWise to record the corrective actions and root cause for the reported issue. Trackwise is widely used to record Audits assessments in our organization. Trackwise is also used to report workmanship issues and to record the cycle time involved to resolve the issue and corrective actions taken to avoid the issue in the future.
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
    • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
    • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sparta Systems
    • Tracking System
    • Search Function
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
    • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sparta Systems
    • No suggestion for improvements
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    We will renew because it is part of our build process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sparta Systems
    The user experience is great and I would recommend other's to use trackwise for it's customization flexibility
    Read full review
    Usability
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Sparta Systems
    Well TrackWise is having everything any organization wanted, as its name itself indicate Track so it will track everything you want, you can generated the adhoc summary for your change control, CAPA, deviation, OOL, OOS which will help you t be prepare to maintain a health quality management system. it will eliminate the dependency of person specific task for tracking and your system will become fully system driven.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Sparta Systems
    I did not interact with the support team.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sparta Systems
    Trackwise is better than Arena. You need sign-offs before moving to the next step. While in Arena, you can complete the whole task and request sign off later. Not sure which is better for everyone, but I prefer to sign off before moving to the next step.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • Better team coordination.
    • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
    • Better project management by having different work streams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sparta Systems
    • More visibility of Quality issues
    • User friendly software
    • Easy to do multiple things at one platform
    Read full review
    ScreenShots