OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi) vs. Rocket Servergraph

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Network Node Manager i is a network management platform acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, and now supported by OpenText.N/A
Rocket Servergraph
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
Rocket Servergraph enables users to automate daily backups and get prioritized real-time alerts on server capacity across data environments. The vendor emphasizes Servergraph’s ability to simplify audit and compliance reporting, including customizable reporting by geography, application, etc.N/A
Pricing
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)Rocket Servergraph
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)Rocket Servergraph
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)Rocket Servergraph
Considered Both Products
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Chose OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
NNMi is best suited for enterprise-grade, large to very large infrastructure. You have fewer servers to install the product and manage all your devices through a single server, which also enhances ease of use.
Chose OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Even though there are many products in the market such as from Solarwinds, CA Spectrum (no DX Spectrum), PRTG that offers similar or even with more flexibility the fault and performance monitoring still Micro Focus is a very nice tool when it comes to Scalability and Stability …
Chose OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Micro Focus comes with in built database for store its raw polled data from network devices and hence it is preferred tool compared to others since other tools requires additional efforts and cost involved as compared to Micro Focus. Also the stability of the product is vey …
Rocket Servergraph
Chose Rocket Servergraph
This is the most reliable platform that ensures that data is controlled successfully. It has helped our IT department utilize time used to monitor data storage disks manually. The overall cost of maintenance is lower as compared to other backup plans. It has reduced time taken …
Best Alternatives
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)Rocket Servergraph
Small Businesses
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.0 out of 10
Cyberduck
Cyberduck
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.0 out of 10
Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Meraki Dashboard
Cisco Meraki Dashboard
Score 9.0 out of 10
Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)Rocket Servergraph
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)Rocket Servergraph
Likelihood to Recommend
[Micro Focus Network Node Manager i (formerly HP Network Node Manager)] is like you implement it, setup monitoring and alerting and forget it forever until any major activity is there and that is possible because of the product's stability. Another reason for product stability is less features as compared to other vendor tools and its own inbuilt database.
Read full review
Rocket Servergraph is well suited for any backup environment where the end user wants a more comprehensive understanding of their systems. I have not found one OEM supplied reporting system that can hold a candle to the job that Rocket does.
Read full review
Pros
  • Network infrastructure monitoring.
  • Interface monitoring.
Read full review
  • Failed backup reporting is easily tailored to specific person, group or function
  • The TSM console makes a novice admin more productive quickly as it builds the command syntax for you.
  • Alerts when a backup system is down or a resource like a storage pool will soon require expansion
  • Trend analysis and historical reporting support capital expenditures
Read full review
Cons
  • Most customers would like to see NNM get away from using some Java applets.
  • In environments where we see more than 10 different network device vendors in production, we see issues with L2 mapping. Different vendors use different L2 protocols. This can cause an issue with L2 discovery and mapping.
Read full review
  • It would be nice to have an administrator console for Networker and Datadomain the likes of the one in TSM which is so incredibly helpful.
Read full review
Usability
NNMi's user interface is described as well-designed and intuitive, making it easy for users to navigate and perform tasks quickly, thereby enhancing the overall user experience. The system offers a powerful network discovery mechanism that maps out your network's physical and virtual topology, enabling you to visualize connections between devices and identify potential issues. Fault monitoring is at its best. NNMi provides a unified environment for viewing faults, availability, and performance data, consolidating essential information into a single platform.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Support is long and arduous and often are unable to help resolve the issue. We often have to do escalations or duty manager to get things moved. Even with a technical account manager, we do not see much improvement from a support point of view. This is an area where Micro Focus has a lot of improvement to do.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
NNMi is best suited for enterprise-grade, large to very large infrastructure. You have fewer servers to install the product and manage all your devices through a single server, which also enhances ease of use.
Read full review
This is the most reliable platform that ensures that data is controlled successfully. It has helped our IT department utilize time used to monitor data storage disks manually. The overall cost of maintenance is lower as compared to other backup plans. It has reduced time taken for auditing our databases due to automatic data auditing system installed on this application.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Improved Network Monitoring Experience
  • Business stability has increased by using this product due to proactive monitoring capabilities
  • Capacity Planning has improved due to out of the box reports availability
Read full review
  • Less need for close backup system oversight so it frees resources for other tasks
  • Found 50 plus tapes that were available scratches
  • You can more confidently determine the need for backup resources throng the systems predictive analysis.
Read full review
ScreenShots