TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText SendSecure

    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    XM SendSecure, now from OpenText (acquired March 2020) is a collaborative file exchange platform. It is designed to facilitate the exchange of sensitive files and has a number of critical security features. First, all files exchanged are systematically encrypted in both the upload and download processes. Receiving files doesn’t require a user account, but recipients are authenticated via one-time code received via a voice call, an SMS, or an email. Further, all exchanged files are…N/A

    HighQ

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AHighQ Collaborate, now from Thomson Reuters (acquired 2019) is a cloud-based enterprise collaboration platform, featuring secure file sharing but also means for sharing documents with users outside the enterprise, as well as a user-interface optimized for mobile devices and intuitive interface, with real-time communication.N/A
    Pricing
    OpenText SendSecureHighQ
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText SendSecureHighQ
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    OpenText SendSecureHighQ
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of OpenText SendSecure and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    OpenText SendSecure
    -
    Ratings
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    8.2
    2 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Task Management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Scheduling00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Workflow Automation00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Mobile Access00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
    Search00 Ratings9.62 Ratings
    Visual planning tools00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of OpenText SendSecure and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    OpenText SendSecure
    -
    Ratings
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    8.6
    2 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Chat00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Notifications00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Discussions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Surveys00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of OpenText SendSecure and Thomson Reuters HighQ
    Feature
    OpenText SendSecure
    -
    Ratings
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    9.4
    2 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Versioning00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Video files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Audio files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Document collaboration00 Ratings9.22 Ratings
    Access control00 Ratings9.22 Ratings
    Advanced security features00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText SendSecureHighQ
    Small Businesses
    FileZilla
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Flock
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    FileZilla
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Troop Messenger
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText SendSecureHighQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.2
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText SendSecureHighQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    It is super easy to use any time we have a need to send something encrypted. It is great, because if we have a client that needs to send us something, we can send that person a link and they are able to use that to send us a protected file.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    HighQ Collaborate is well suited to situations where a law firm maintains numerous documents for a client and the client needs access to them on a regular basis. For example, we may store the client's minute book (which is relatively common for a large corporate law firm to do), but the client may need access to documents in that minute book on a regular basis. Likewise, we have an internal system at the firm for hosting digital versions of closing books, however, many clients would not have a similar system because they would only receive closing books irregularly. USBs get lost and the client might not want to put the closing book on the main server where anyone can access it. By putting the closing book on the extranet site, the individuals in the client's organization who should be able to access the closing book can do so.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • It is very user-friendly even for users that are not particularly tech-savvy.
    • The integration into Outlook makes it so convenient to use.
    • Gaining access to the portal is easy as well, so if you are away from your workstation, you can still send things securely.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    • Document sharing. This product makes it easy to upload, review and organize documents related to a particular project or matter.
    • Permissions. Collaborate allows very granular permissions to be assigned for shared documents and administrative activities such as workflows.
    • Reliability. The product is cloud-based and rarely, if ever, unavailable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • Only compatible with Outlook 2010 or newer.
    • Only compatible with Windows OS.
    • No other complaints so far.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    • It is just not that exciting. We host documents on there for clients but the extranet sites have ultimately turned out to not be a product that our clients are clamoring for or that we are regularly pushing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Thomson Reuters
    The interface is easy to use and overall the software seems pretty robust (I haven't had any crashes yet), so I haven't had to use the support very often. Likewise, I don't think I've ever had a client e-mail me with questions or issues - the software is pretty idiot-proof.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    None. We were not able to email securely.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    I feel that HighQ does not really have any real competition in this space because it simply accomplishes its goals far better than the competition at lower cost, while requiring less training and administration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • It allowed us to become HIPAA compliant with email.
    • It integrates seamlessly into our current email interface.
    • Support we have received has been excellent. Always timely.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Thomson Reuters
    • Permits fairly simple administration by a single person for hundreds of Extranets
    • One shop stopping for reliable, secure document sharing and signing with external parties
    • Simple enough to use that internal and external users do not need training to take advantage of the product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    OpenText SendSecure Screenshots

    Screenshot of Ephemeral SafeBoxScreenshot of Seamless integration with Outlook (Office 365)