TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText Silk Central vs. TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Silk Central

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AFormerly from Micro Focus and earliler from Borland, unified test management with OpenText™ Silk Central drives reuse and efficiency. It gives users the visibility to control application readiness.N/A

    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)

    Score8.9 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    TestMu AI (formerly LambdaTest) is a full-stack, AI-native quality engineering platform that lets teams plan, author, execute and analyse software quality in one place, across web, mobile and AI applications. Performance and load testing: TestMu AI runs JMeter .jmx plans and Gatling simulations unchanged, at protocol level, on managed cloud load generators that are provisioned for each run across six regions and removed when it ends, so there is no load…

    $19

    per month per user

    Pricing
    OpenText Silk CentralTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Virtual Live
    $19
    per month Parallel Test
    Real Device Plus Live
    $49
    per month 1 parallel test
    Test Manager
    $59
    per month per seat
    Web Automation on Desktop
    $99
    per month Parallel Test
    Virtual Automation Cloud
    $159
    per month Parallel Test
    HyperExecute Cloud (Multi OS)
    $199
    per month Parallel Test
    Real Device + Automation Cloud
    $249
    per month Parallel Test
    SmartUI Visual Regression
    $269
    per month Parallel Test
    Kane AI (Mobile + Web)
    $349
    per month Parallel Test
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    Parallel Test
    HyperExecute On-Premise
    Custom Pricing
    per parallel test
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText Silk CentralTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OpenText Silk CentralTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    TestMu AI
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Would buy again
    105 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    99 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    107 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    75 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    89 Answers
    Features
    OpenText Silk CentralTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of OpenText Silk Central and TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Feature
    OpenText Silk Central
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    1% below category average
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    -
    Ratings
    Centralized test management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manage test hosts and schedules7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test execution reporting6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    OpenText Silk CentralTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (118 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (7 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (70 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (7 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText Silk CentralTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    We didn't just select Borland Silk Central randomly. In the selection process, we actually evaluated in total 26 available test management tools in the market. We sent surveys to all potential users in the department to collect their wish list of our next management tool, converted them to a criteria list, and used that list to evaluate all 26 tools. We reduced the possible candidate tools to five and organized a small committee to pick the final three. Top management then checked their price tags and selected Borland Silk Central. Based on this evaluation process, I would say Borland Silk Central is suitable to an organization which has no more than 60 testers; needs both manual tests and automated tests; needs on-line support; needs a low learning curve and has a limited budget. My personal view is that this tool reaches the balance points among ease-of-use, budget and support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    One day, I needed to test a specific issue that was occurring only on Pixel phones. I turned to LambdaTest, quickly identified the problem, and was able to fix it. There hasn't been a situation where I felt LambdaTest didn't help, it's my go-to solution for testing, as it solves many problems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Borland Silk Central is good for the users to associate test requirements, test cases, execution plans and test reports together. Each asset (test case, requirement, etc...) provides links for the users to jump to other assets in a click, and the users can jump back and forth between two assets.
    • Borland Silk Central is also good in test automation. Although Micro Focus does provide a client tool for test automation, the users don't really need it to automate the tests. In our case, we are using Python to automate the tests and use a batch file to launch tests, and in Borland Silk Central we just call that batch file from server side. The test result is automatically fed back to Silk server.
    • Micro Focus also publishes the schema of the database behind Borland Silk Central, so it is very easy to extend its function beyond its original design. Moreover, because its schema is published, we can easily retrieve and process its data for business intelligence purpose.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    • Very accessible as multiple users can be added in each subscription
    • Very reliable as it is very close to the actual device when it comes to operating system and version behavior
    • There are a lot of options for devices and browsers that users can choose from when it comes to emulating and testing
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • On the other hand, the plugins of Borland Silk Central with third-party tools are programmed poorly. In our case, the plugins for JIRA have a lot of limitations and were almost unusable in our test environment. (They did improve the plugins a little bit later, however.)
    • The tech support people are located in UK, so frequently it is difficult to get a hold of these guys due to different time zones. Also, most of them obviously don't have enough experience and sometimes drove us nuts in emergency situations.
    • The last thing I feel is that Micro Focus possibly doesn't provide enough manpower to maintain Borland Silk Central. There are tons of feature requests for Borland Silk Central pending there. Although they have frequent hot fixes every few months, they don't digest these requests quick enough.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    • More real devices should be added like I have Samsung mobile but it was not in the list
    • It takes time in checking the link on LambdaTest if we compare with real mobiles
    • Sometimes exact results are not matching as from real mobiles
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    The reason i have given the 10 points becasue the problem LambdaTest solves is providing access to all devices in one place, allowing developers to identify the same errors they would encounter on real devices. This makes life much easier, especially for developers who regularly face cross-device functionality issues. It's a big plus point that positions LambdaTest as an all-in-one solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    Because of the ease of use of the platform, we just save a lot of time and effort with this as its a feature rich solution, we just need to upload app binary once and for everytime we need to test on a different device we can just directly install that binary on the device without the pain of reupload.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    yes always available
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    haven't found any glitch while using this
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    Implementation of Lambdatest was very easy for different project requirements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    We had evaluated, for example:
    • IBM Collaborate Suite - it is way too complicated and the learning curve is too high.
    • HP Quality Center - it is OK but a little bit expensive.
    • TestLink, Squash TM and other open source tools: The capabilities of open source tools just can't compare to commercial tools. Although we can modify the source code to improve the tool, we are just test engineers, not developers.
    • Zephyr: Our testers simply didn't like its UI - too weird.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    While BrowserStack is also a well-established platform, we found LambdaTest to offer similar and even better features at reasonable pricing. LambdaTest is more cost-effective than BrowserStack. LambdaTest provides a free forever plan, while BrowserStack does not. Even manual testing plans are better priced than BrowserStack’s. In terms of UI and onboarding, we found LambdaTest more user-friendly as well.
    Read full review
    Scalability
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    TestMu AI
    not all department, but we're using for our clients
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • Borland Silk Central provides a centralized test platform for multiple test departments in the company, so now all of the departments know what each of them is doing. In turn, all departments can coordinate with each other to reduce the duplicated test items and increase the overall test efficiency.
    • Also, Borland Silk Central enables the users to publish the test procedure (steps) of each test case so all the users can know how each test case is performed. It is not like what we had before, the test procedures resided in difference place from Excel to Google drive or some other weird locations.
    • Also, because all departments are using Borland Silk Central, all testers of the departments have better communication regarding testing methods. In the past, the department used different test management tools and it was hard for the testers to understand each other's testing methods.
    • Finally, because all departments share BorlandSilk Central, they also share the same set of reports published to Atlassian Confluence, so now they use the same set of reports to evaluate the test progress.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    • Automation testing has a bit of a learning curve
    • Lack of real device keep that bug in your head if not on the website.
    • Need to wait for a while for a new OS or browser version on the contrary of immediate availability in case of owning a lab
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) Screenshots

    Screenshot of An automated screenshot.Screenshot of Mobile-browser-testingScreenshot of Automation testing on LambdatestScreenshot of Some of the available integrations.Screenshot of Real-time testingScreenshot of Responsive testing