OpenText Threat Detection and Response vs. Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OpenText Threat Detection and Response | Score7.4 out of 10 | N/A | A combined SIEM and SOAR, used to accelerate threat detection and response with holistic security analytics, native SOAR, and intelligent automation. | N/A |
Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull (TRAP) enables messaging and security administrators to automatically retract threats delivered to employee inboxes and emails that turn malicious after delivery to quarantine. It is also a powerful solution to retract messages sent in error as well as inappropriate, malicious, or emails containing compliance violations and also follows forwarded mail and distribution lists and creates an audit-able activity trail. With Proofpoint Threat Response… | N/A |
| OpenText Threat Detection and Response | Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| OpenText Threat Detection and Response | Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
60% Would buy again 3 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
80% Happy with the feature set 4 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
80% Implementation went as expected 4 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| OpenText Threat Detection and Response | Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Incident Response Platforms |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OpenText Threat Detection and Response | Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() IBM Security QRadar SIEM Score8.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | SolarWinds Security Event Manager (SEM) Score8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| OpenText Threat Detection and Response | Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Usability | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | 9.0 |
| OpenText Threat Detection and Response | Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |




