Oracle WebCenter Content is Oracle's ECM Suite. This product is tightly integrated to other Oracle products and provides ECM functionality to Siebel CRM and PeopleSoft. The WebCenter product family also includes Oracle's CMS (WebCenter Sites) which they acquired from FatWire.
N/A
Progress Sitefinity
Score7.9 out of 10
N/A
Progress Sitefinity is a content management and customer analytics platform. It supports content management, tailored marketing, multi-channel management, and ecommerce sites.
N/A
Pricing
Oracle WebCenter Content
Progress Sitefinity
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle WebCenter Content
Progress Sitefinity
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Oracle WebCenter Content
Progress Sitefinity
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Oracle WebCenter Content and Progress Sitefinity
Feature
Oracle WebCenter Content
7.6
4 Ratings
6% below category average
Progress Sitefinity
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging
7.94 Ratings
00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document management
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Records management
7.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation
6.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated workflows
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration
8.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Oracle WebCenter Content and Progress Sitefinity
Feature
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
Progress Sitefinity
8.1
163 Ratings
1% above category average
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
8.1163 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Oracle WebCenter Content and Progress Sitefinity
Feature
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
Progress Sitefinity
8.1
144 Ratings
1% above category average
API
00 Ratings
8.1137 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
00 Ratings
8.1106 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Oracle WebCenter Content and Progress Sitefinity
Feature
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
Progress Sitefinity
8.0
170 Ratings
12% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
00 Ratings
8.1160 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
00 Ratings
8.0151 Ratings
Admin section
00 Ratings
8.0168 Ratings
Page templates
00 Ratings
8.1164 Ratings
Library of website themes
00 Ratings
8.0104 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
00 Ratings
8.0155 Ratings
Publishing workflow
00 Ratings
8.1152 Ratings
Form generator
00 Ratings
8.0140 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Oracle WebCenter Content and Progress Sitefinity
WebCenter Content is suitable for payables invoice processing for companies with a huge volume of paper invoices. 80% of data entry effort can be reduced. For small companies with less volume, WebCenter may not make sense. WebCenter is not perfect. It has some issues. We raised enhancement requests with Oracle, hopefully, Oracle will resolve them soon.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Progress Sitefinity remains a little heavyweight for sites that require basic text content, or a limited number of pages. However, its flexibility (including the range of different content types if supports) make it a good choice for any organization requiring advanced content management capabilities at an affordable price.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
'Low-code structured content' (dynamic content types) is one of Sitefinity's most powerful features that allows you to structure content according to business needs, while at the same time dampening editorial freedom to ensure accessibility, meta enhancement, SEO and API consumption can be achieved.
Sitefinity's content provider model allows us to flexibly (by means of admin interface) easily aggregate or separate content sharing within a multi-site instance.
This proofs particularly powerful in emerging situations where there suddenly is a demand for content sharing across countries or regions.
Adaptability at its core.
While there's never a perfect fit for everything, it allows for easy code customization and extension being a .NET application at heart. Giving it a corporate edge over other custom solutions, whether it is on the development side or deployment side (on premise, IaaS or Azure DevOps Paas). And it has enabled us to put the system to use in its core feature - which is to manage content, where on other occasions we were able to take full advantage of its features such as A/B testing and personalization.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Diagram or illustrate more use cases for server setups, and managing of upgrades.
I'd like to see the ability to synchronize from one server to multiple others at once.
Implementation assistance as part of the purchase rather than farming out to 3rd party, although they did answer every question we asked in order to determine our best architecture setup.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The challenges with converting to a completely new system create quite a barrier to switching to anything else. If we find another system that offers guaranteed improvements to the user interface -- as well as as a more coherent set of options for data interchanges with current and future enterprise data sources -- we would be more interested in swithing to that new product. Of course, the expense in purchasing competitor system, along with the costs of migrating all current content, along with retooling all existing workflows in place, would be carefully weighed against the benefits incurred from a switch-over.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Very big fan of this CMS, as it allows scalability, performance, and everything else. The support is great whenever we need it. As a marketer, the digital/marketing side of things is very easy to use and we've seen strong results from an SEO and marketing perspective. I can't speak to the developer/creative side too much, but in talking with these teams, they do recommend the tool as well.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Support can be pretty good, even though, depending on the level of licensing, it can take longer to hear back from their team. They do have a phone option, which works well. Overall, they are knowledgeable, and helpful when needed. At times, support is able to access the system directly and troubleshoot critical items when needed.
N/A - I was not part of the implementation team. We have had this internally for over 5 years. Based on my experience, ensure that you have documentation on the initial implementation and subsequent upgrades. I would also recommend to have all the documentation on how and why the system was implemented the way it was
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I can't really provide an answer for this question because I think the basic premise is flawed. Which system an organization selects is based (or should be based) on their unique business and organizational requirements, not the features of the system. We do not recommend a particular solution to a client based on subjective preference for one system over another but rather for its appropriateness to achieve a particular goal or collection of goals.
It is hands down just easier for our customers to use. The interface and the page builder experience is much better than what we have used in the past and has many enterprise features even in the lower price-point
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We were looking for a scalable solution for invoice processing needs. WebCenter did fit the bill. It reduced manual data entry effort by 80%.
WebCenter saved our storage costs. We do not need to store the physical paper copies anymore in our expensive offices.
WebCenter increased the employee engagement and reduced monotonous data entry work. Employees now have time to spend on value-added work rather than data entry.
Auditors were happy with the tool, as they can retrieve any document with the click of a button as opposed to search and find a physical document.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info