Orbis MES vs. SAP Digital Manufacturing

It is well suited for a standard workstation where orders need to be displayed and where feedback is provided either manually or by the machine.Special use cases, such as generating serial numbers for consistent component identification, require a fair amount of in-house development. Another drawback is that some scenarios supported in SAP PP cannot be mapped using DM

• Automation using triggers and PPDs
• Shopfloor tracking using asset managements
• Low Code No Code dev style for POD interface development
• Intuitive dashboards using SAC

Incentivized

• Edge component - this needs to be improved to provide a seamless connection.
• The inbuilt functionalities like in ME instead of building separate production process.
• The EDHR reports needs to be similar in SAP ME.
• Configurable OEE reports and history reports delivered out of the box.
• Integrated with non - SAP ERP.

Incentivized

The interface works well once we have a clear knowledge on it. It gives clear process steps and real time information The UI can be more simplified and the number of clicks required to for certain functionalities can be reduced

Incentivized

I have used some custom in house applications SAP application is more reliable since it uses standard practices compared to the in house application

Incentivized

• As it is cloud based product, quarterly upgrades impacts the production and needs effort and resources for testing
• Product is not fully matured. It still has bugs

Incentivized