PDQ Deploy & Inventory vs. Red Hat Satellite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
PDQ Deploy & Inventory
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
PDQ.com headquartered in Salt Lake City offers PDQ Deploy, a software deployment tool used to keep Windows PCs up-to-date without bothering end users.
$1,575
per year per user
Red Hat Satellite
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat® Satellite is an infrastructure management product specifically designed to keep Red Hat Enterprise Linux® environments and other Red Hat infrastructure running efficiently, with security, and compliant with various standards.N/A
Pricing
PDQ Deploy & InventoryRed Hat Satellite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PDQ Deploy & InventoryRed Hat Satellite
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPDQ was built by entrepreneurs & educators. Small businesses (<50 employees), nonprofits, and schools enjoy a 15% discount.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PDQ Deploy & InventoryRed Hat Satellite
Best Alternatives
PDQ Deploy & InventoryRed Hat Satellite
Small Businesses
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Action1
Action1
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PDQ Deploy & InventoryRed Hat Satellite
Likelihood to Recommend
9.7
(12 ratings)
9.2
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.3
(6 ratings)
6.5
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
PDQ Deploy & InventoryRed Hat Satellite
Likelihood to Recommend
PDQ
PDQ Inventory is great if you have a local network of computers on or off a domain. As long as you have a way to log into them with common credentials. Great for large organizations, particularly ones interconnected with VPNs. PDQ Inventory isn't so great for PCs that aren't connected to the same LAN the server is on. (i.e. non-vpn remote users) They used to have a remote agent you could install, but it was removed after numerous issues.
Read full review
Red Hat
What we really like, is the patching part, os usefulle and easy to manage. Something that we don't use, is the VM deployment from Satellite, since we have only 8 VCD licences and a 30-nodes VMWare cluster, it was pretty hard to manage on which physical node the VMs should run .
Read full review
Pros
PDQ
  • Push out new software
  • Push out Updates to current software
  • Push out patches and updates that we don't have other ways to push out
  • Keep end-users updated with little involvement
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Patch Staging
  • Customized Software Repositories
  • Version Control of Repositories
Read full review
Cons
PDQ
  • As good as there email support is.. would like a live operator option
  • Some updates are hard to understand when 5 versions of the same program exist
  • Thats about it, PDQ deploy is the best out there
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Some things are confusing for new users of the platform
  • More dashboards
  • A more user friendly GUI
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
PDQ
PDQ is very useful and one of the tools that we use a lot.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Usability
PDQ
Logical - If I want to do something with the software, it is quite clear on how I need to go about that. There isn't some weird process that is proprietary to just that vendor and is counterintuitive. What I want to see is displayed with just a couple clicks.
Read full review
Red Hat
It is part of our daily job, without it, we will have to manually maintain a server with repos, update the repos, it will ask us a lot of time to prepare a new set of repos, and so on. Even if it is a bit tricky to use, and for a newcomer, it needs some time, we still love to use the tool, and we keep it up to date. Curerntly using v6.19.2
Read full review
Support Rating
PDQ
The built-in help menus and general ease of use render whatever systems support there might be almost irrelevant. There is stability in the system's simplicity; if you're in the position to use such a product, you're your own best friend. Simple web searches more often than not turn up the solution to any little niggles, such as what silent install switches specific applications require (a remarkably wide choice of options exist). System updates are timely and unobtrusive, installing in no time at all. Maybe I've just been lucky; if so, long may it continue!
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
PDQ
This software was referred to us by an IT professional. Previously, we were installing the software with the help of remote desktop applications but it was very time consuming; it was wasting the user's time since he could not use his computer. After testing PDQ Deploy, we just never looked back.
Read full review
Red Hat
Not sure about this question, there a no other solutions that Satellites beside Foreman(free version without support) Are you talking about Red Hat in general ? If it is about RH, well, we like the support we have, all the tools available. We used to have a TAM, which as very interesting, but the new cost to have was way to high... so we deciced to let it go.
Read full review
Return on Investment
PDQ
  • Speed of deployment is very positive for new software setup, saving hours of testing and deployment locally
  • Made patching for large computer estate very efficient, another positive for staff not having to spend hours of patching individual machines
  • Works well for small team of IT's and again makes various repetitive tasks much easier
Read full review
Red Hat
  • We have been able to automate the update process to not require after-hours monitoring.
  • Centralizing updates has greatly reduced the overall time servers are down and processing their individual updates.
  • We are able to bring our own RPM packages in and stage them in the same deployment model as official Red Hat packages.
Read full review
ScreenShots