Planview ProjectPlace vs. SeaTable
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Planview ProjectPlace | Score8.3 out of 10 | N/A | Projectplace is a collaborative work management solution. The vendor says the product is built with teams of all sizes and complexity in mind, from virtual teams of five to entire global enterprises with tens of thousands of active users. It is also designed to incorporate waterfall and agile workflows. | N/A |
SeaTable | Score8.1 out of 10 | N/A | With SeaTable, teams can organize tasks, assets, projects and ideas. It looks like a spreadsheet but structures any type of information, in the cloud or on the user's own server. SeaTable is a web solution to design business processeses and workflows. SeaTable is designed to give teams the information that is currently needed. Individual views provide the freedom to organize work as it is needed. SeaTable can be linked with other business applications and… | $0 up to 3 users |
| Planview ProjectPlace | SeaTable | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Planview ProjectPlace | SeaTable | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
94% Would buy again 88 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
98% Delivers good value for the price 80 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
97% Happy with the feature set 91 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 60 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
94% Implementation went as expected 63 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Planview ProjectPlace | SeaTable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Professional Services Automation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Planview ProjectPlace | SeaTable | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Any.do Score8 out of 10 | Any.do Score8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | KanbanFlow Score7.3 out of 10 | KanbanFlow Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Microsoft To Do Score7.9 out of 10 | Microsoft To Do Score7.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Planview ProjectPlace | SeaTable | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.2 | - |
| Usability | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| Availability | 9.1 | - |
| Performance | 9.1 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 9.1 | - |
| Configurability | 6.4 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.1 | - |
| Product Scalability | 9.1 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 6.4 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 6.4 | - |
| Planview ProjectPlace | SeaTable | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Planview ProjectPlace Screenshots | SeaTable Screenshots |


















