QA Sphere vs. TestComplete

TestComplete

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
QA Sphere	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	QA Sphere is a cloud-based Test Management system for planning, organizing, executing, and reporting on manual and exploratory software tests. The platform centralizes test cases, test runs, results, requirements, and linked defects. Key Capabilities Test case management: Teams can organize test cases by folder, tag, priority, and project. Parameterized cases support multiple data variations without duplicating the test steps. Test suites can be imported and…	$12 per month per user
TestComplete	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	TestComplete is a GUI test automation tool that enables users of all skill levels to test the UI of every desktop, web, and mobile application. TestComplete is best suited for testers, automation engineers, and QA teams in any industry.	$2,256 per license

Pricing

QA Sphere

TestComplete

Editions & Modules

Free: $0
Standard: $12
per month per user
Business: $24
per month per user

Node-Locked Base: 2,256
per license
Node-Locked Pro: 3,950
per license
Float - Base: 5,077
per license
Float - Pro: 7,901
per license

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
QA Sphere	TestComplete
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

QA Sphere is priced per user per month. The Free plan covers up to 3 users with 1 GB of attachment storage, full API and integration access, and a capped allowance of AI generations. Standard is $12 per user per month and adds unlimited projects, 20 GB of attachment storage, Google SSO, unlimited free read-only viewer seats for stakeholders, and AI test case generation and bug reporting without credit metering. Business is $24 per user per month for teams needing higher limits and additional administrative controls. Custom enterprise terms are available, and a 30-day trial requires no credit card.

Pay for only the modules needed. TestComplete Pro includes all three modules: desktop, web, and mobile, at a bundled price point, as well as access to the parallel testing engine, TestExecute. TestComplete has additional add-ons, including TestExecute and the Intelligent Quality Add-On.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	QA Sphere	TestComplete

Best Alternatives
	QA Sphere	TestComplete
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.5 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 9.3 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 6.1 out of 10
Enterprises	OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 9.3 out of 10	SoapUI Open Source Score 8.3 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	QA Sphere	TestComplete
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	7.0 (88 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	8.1 (6 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	7.8 (7 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	6.6 (7 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	6.7 (4 ratings)

User Testimonials
	QA Sphere	TestComplete
Likelihood to Recommend	Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic	SmartBear Best suited to smaller unit test or tests broken up, couple of forms at a time Not suited - larger regressions test involving multiple systems. - my main regression involving payments has been unsuccessful for the last 3 years despite all working fine separately and while being watched Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic	SmartBear Identifying UI objects and application structure Expandability of tests through scripts and script extensions/plugins low barrier of entry (you can get started quickly, and other's don't need much explanation to contribute on a basic level) Possibility of Jira integration for reporting Relatively few (and usually easy to solve) git conflicts when working simultaneously easy handling of test data, also for iterative tests Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic	SmartBear TestComplete could stand to have a simplified view for different types of users. For instance, as a manager/architecture guy, I'm not so interested in getting into the code and am more interested in file-based interactions. TestComplete could use more integration with reporting for things like TeamCity to improve test status visibility. Incentivized Ben Fishel-Brown Test Automation & Security Team Lead Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic	SmartBear We have bigger test automation pack using test complete at the same time we also think this is not good performing tool for large number of test automation scripts. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic	SmartBear It is usable when you become accustomed to its quirks. Not using it for two months and then you need to re-learn the quirks for some features (but some quirks are so awful that they will never fade from your memory). So, when using it regularly, it is possible to be quite productive, if no big correction in name mapping is needed. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic	SmartBear Some bugs were quickly resolved, but most UX quirks of the tool are just marked "as designed". No follow up for enhancement request. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Implementation Rating	Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic	SmartBear If you develop a mobile application and your testing process goes in cloud, probably you will face a problem - how to implement a stable connection between your mobile devices and testing servers Incentivized Yury Vakhatov Test Automation Engineer Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic	SmartBear TestComplete stacks up against them in terms of GUI and seamless performance. It records each and every step and action been performed in the application and produces a detailed report in a well-structured manner. It can connect and access seamlessly among various databases directly to speed up the testing process. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Hypersequent DMCC No answers on this topic	SmartBear Saves hundreds of man-hours with either QA testing or data entry With the small cost of the product, it has saved the company money with both employee costs as well as the cost of mistakes made by human error or software bugs Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	QA Sphere Screenshots