Qlik Replicate vs. Vertify

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Qlik Replicate
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Qlik Replicate enables organizations to accelerate data real-time replication, ingestion and streaming via change data capture, across a wide range of heterogeneous databases, data warehouses and data lake platforms.N/A
Vertify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
VertifyData is a cloud-based integration platform with core integration capacities, including a drag-and-drop interface and real-time synchronization. It also offers over 80 prebuilt connectors and templates, plus customizable integrations for scaling businesses.
$4,800
per year
Pricing
Qlik ReplicateVertify
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
RevOps as a Service
4,800
per year
Starter
$7,350
per year
Growth
$11,100
per year
Premium
15,000
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Qlik ReplicateVertify
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Qlik ReplicateVertify
Considered Both Products
Qlik Replicate
Chose Qlik Replicate
I found this as my lifesaver in terms of its efficacy and approachable to scale the streaming data from our ecommerce platform and analytics of data made much easier than compared to others. As it's partners with azure and other platforms which made our applications faster to …
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate is fast and easy. ADF can do a wider variety of things
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate was very cost-effective and easy to use.
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik gave better perfoamnce
Chose Qlik Replicate
For different data bases source and target support, transformations, scalability, speed
Chose Qlik Replicate
We tried to use Oracle GoldenGate for our Oracle source replication needs but, had too many issues with a number of our tables due to churn or size. Qlik Replicate had no issues. And, we can tune our tasks to not impact the source systems we are pulling from.
Chose Qlik Replicate
Great tool for data replication solution for Oracle/SQLServers/etc. Real easy to get it set up and start realizing business value. Getting the PoC accomplished in a short window. Product costing and easy to start small and scale as needed. It helped cover most of our ask …
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate / Attunity was able to be put on our server behind our firewall where with Fivetran would have required. Fivetran would also have required a different SQL server CDC setup. HVR was just as powerful if not more but was more costly and the user interface was not …
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate was more manageable, very intuitive and easy to understand than the other products like Striim. The learning curve is less with Qlik Replicate and the connectors for various sources was easier to plug and play.
Chose Qlik Replicate
The biggest advantage of Replicate in comparison to Fivetran is that we can run the application on-prem. This allows us to configure it precisely how we desire, avoid opening additional ports in our firewall, and monitor its resource consumption directly. That level of …
Chose Qlik Replicate
We replaced IBM’s Change Data Delivery software (Change Data capture specifically for Netezza) because it had a bad user interface, it was difficult to set up, and it was very hard to troubleshoot errors. We selected Qlik Replicate (then called Attunity CDC) because it has a …
Chose Qlik Replicate
We have not evaluated any other products in the last 3 years.
Chose Qlik Replicate
Attunity: Easy interface, relatively easy monitoring, zos support, budget friendly.
we choose Attunity.
At the same time we use AWS DMS for DB2, sqlserver -> aws services replications (cheaper). However because AWS DMS does not support db2 zos we use Attunity for db2 zos …
Chose Qlik Replicate
Far less complex to manage
Chose Qlik Replicate
Simple to do one-to-one copy and very reliable, as other tools a little complex in setting up the pipelines and scheduling parts. Very simple to connect to the SFTP locations and easy to download them as well.
Chose Qlik Replicate
You need to have expertise knowledge to design and develop data using visual studio. But you can design a data flow with minimum experience. In addition to that QLIK has a better performance. It enables you to replicate a large volume of data with minimum latency. The …
Chose Qlik Replicate
We helped attunity (prior owners if replicate) build out new features and worked through bugs with them. Their product was not great when we originally started but there were no other solutions in the market except for Golden Gate which had a hefty price tag associated with it.
Chose Qlik Replicate
SSIS lacks real time replication and the only place where it can beat SSIS.
Additionally, has more end point connectors than SSIS,
Chose Qlik Replicate
Both of these work with API's and services, Qlik Replicate does not.
Chose Qlik Replicate
We're still evaluating, but so far Replicate is easier to set up than HVR. I'm not involved with the FiveTran evaluation.
Chose Qlik Replicate
Qlik Replicate's power is in its simple 1:1 copying of database tables and architecture and maintaining a near real-time copy of that database. Talend and SSIS are different tools and more for custom ETL's that require various steps to connect to SFTP or download files. …
Chose Qlik Replicate
We tried MIMIX, SQL SSIS and Veeam but our team found Qlik Replicate had an advantage over all these three in terms of speed, UI, and ease of maintenance.
Chose Qlik Replicate
I have not evaluated any other competing products. Qlik Replicate was the first product we selected for the data lake three years ago, and we have stayed with it ever since.
Vertify
Chose Vertify
I've never used Bedrock data, we only got demos, so I am not sure.
Chose Vertify
We were using Scribe for similar tasks but with different connectors. And it served us well, so absolutely no hard feelings here. But when it came to creating complex workflows, we instantly understood Vertify's approach better. Data lookup and transformation e.g. are pretty …
Chose Vertify
Vertify offered more flexibility and was presented as a simple solution. In reality, it is more complex that we envisioned and we have never fully utilized our tools due to the lack of ability to configure things properly.
Best Alternatives
Qlik ReplicateVertify
Small Businesses
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Score 8.8 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cohesity Data Cloud
Cohesity Data Cloud
Score 8.8 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Cohesity Data Cloud
Cohesity Data Cloud
Score 8.8 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Qlik ReplicateVertify
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Qlik ReplicateVertify
Likelihood to Recommend
Qlik Replicate works very well with relational data platforms, both on premise and in the cloud, for example Oracle, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL and others, it also works very well with DB2. If the data source is MongoDB, it is more complicated and currently there is no possibility of sending data to MongoDB.
Read full review
When we first implemented, there were a lot of fields not set up/syncing properly. But by consulting with Vertify, for a lot of hours, we have been able to work through a lot of those errors, and our Account Manager and the tech support people like Markus and Jamie have been very supportive and helpful in getting us up and running properly.
Read full review
Pros
  • Qlik Replicate brought a great experience with respect to the ease of implementation and great UI. We had a software that was a blackbox for the team and was very hard to maintain. Qlik Replicate implementation helped us avoid dependency on one resource.
  • Global transformation and in-built functions are what I like in our project.
  • You can customize the conversion/transformation using a JSON file generated by Qlik Replicate, and it is very convenient.
Read full review
  • All clients in the CRM are mirrored in the ESP.
  • Data points about client interaction are pushed to the email tool.
  • Emails can be triggered based off activities that are tracked in the CRM.
  • One or two-way syncs can be configured.
Read full review
Cons
  • The base Replicate web GUI is lacking. If you have dozens or more tasks, it's hard to get a sense of how they're performing. Enterprise Manager solves all of these problems but is a separate install.
  • The support portal is extremely difficult to navigate. It's hard to track down exactly what you're looking for.
  • It would be helpful to have better documentation and example queries for the tables in the Enterprise Manager analytics database.
  • Destination databases that don't support common DDL commands behave unpredictably. And the replication of schema changes isn't consistent.
Read full review
  • I think the UI could get a refresher. It looks a little old-school and I sometimes get lost in the navigation.
  • I saw some inconsistencies on the scheduler, most likely caused by time zone differences. One dialogue reflected the user's time zone, the next server's time zone.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
The availability of the replicated data in disparate environments has is now crucial. Replacing a product like Qlik Replicate would require significant time, investments, and work. In addition, Qlik Replicate is reasonably reliable with few failures.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
We now have greater business flexibility and scalability, and our big data integration projects have a quick rate of growth, which has been profitable for us. Independent of the sources involved, maintaining data consistency between sources is easy. One of my favorite features is the way it lets owners of the source system start and stop processes from updating their system windows.
Read full review
Creating a mapping between source and target while also using lookups and transformations is not trivial. And VertifyData solved this reasonably well, at least all users in my organization understood it pretty quickly.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
It is not the easiest user interface to read/understand. However, once you understand how it works, then using it is not that bad. It's hard to remember what feature is listed under what tab (Manage vs. Define). A suggestion would be to get all call to actions on the same page
Read full review
Support Rating
The issue I've had is that Qlik does an awful job of keeping their customers informed when new versions of the software are available. We found that we were using a version that was no longer supported and could never get help. When it came time to get us upgraded so that we were on a current version, no one knew how to help get us to where we needed to be. We had to purchased professional services time and even then I was basically on my own to get everything built out and set up. Qlik needs to be more proactive with communicating about new releases and how to get your version upgraded in the most secure, safe way possible.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Follow the directions from the Qlik documentation. They are pretty straight forward and easy enough to follow. If you follow these, then you are not likely to have issues on implementation.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Great tool for data replication solution for Oracle/SQLServers/etc. Real easy to get it set up and start realizing business value. Getting the PoC accomplished in a short window. Product costing and easy to start small and scale as needed. It helped cover most of our ask compared to other solutions.
Read full review
We were using Scribe for similar tasks but with different connectors. And it served us well, so absolutely no hard feelings here. But when it came to creating complex workflows, we instantly understood Vertify's approach better. Data lookup and transformation e.g. are pretty easy in Vertify and ease of use was definitely what we were looking for.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Prior to using Qlik Replicate, we used an ETL solution to copy data from the Oracle ERP system to the Microsoft SQL Server BI system at a 15-minute interval. It was very tedious to maintain. Qlik Replicate is much easier to use and we replicate data near real-time now.
Read full review
  • Independently, teams are able to carry out their process with less communication and at a higher level of accuracy.
  • VertifyData is actively taking into consideration, consulting, and supporting our plans to build out the business
Read full review
ScreenShots

Qlik Replicate Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of