Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense) vs. Wolfram Mathematica

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Qlik Sense® is a self-service BI platform for data discovery and visualization. It supports a full range of analytics use cases—data governance, pixel-perfect reporting, and collaboration. Its Associative Engine indexes and connects relationships between data points for creating actionable insights.
$200
per month
Mathematica
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Wolfram's flagship product Mathematica is a modern technical computing application featuring a flexible symbolic coding language and a wide array of graphing and data visualization capabilities.
$1,520
per year
Pricing
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)Wolfram Mathematica
Editions & Modules
Starter
$200
per month
Standard
$825
per month
Premium
$2750
per month
Qlik Sense (On-Premise)
Contact Sales
Standard Cloud
$1,520
per year
Standard Desktop
$3,040
one-time fee
Standard Desktop & Cloud
$3,344
one-time fee
Mathematica Enterprise Edition
$8,150.00
one-time fee
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)Mathematica
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscounts available for students and educational institutions. The Network Edition reduce per-user license costs through shared deployment across any number of machines on a local-area network.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)Wolfram Mathematica
Features
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)Wolfram Mathematica
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
7.9
315 Ratings
4% below category average
Wolfram Mathematica
9.9
6 Ratings
20% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports8.3216 Ratings9.84 Ratings
Customizable dashboards8.0313 Ratings9.94 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.4228 Ratings9.96 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
7.0
326 Ratings
14% below category average
Wolfram Mathematica
9.9
9 Ratings
24% above category average
Drill-down analysis8.0322 Ratings9.98 Ratings
Formatting capabilities6.0315 Ratings9.98 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages6.1154 Ratings9.97 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration7.9299 Ratings9.99 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
7.8
278 Ratings
5% below category average
Wolfram Mathematica
9.3
8 Ratings
13% above category average
Publish to Web6.2210 Ratings9.97 Ratings
Publish to PDF7.2257 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Report Versioning7.9176 Ratings9.97 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.9183 Ratings8.95 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers8.4108 Ratings8.95 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
6.7
314 Ratings
17% below category average
Wolfram Mathematica
9.9
9 Ratings
24% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)6.7307 Ratings9.99 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization8.4283 Ratings9.98 Ratings
Predictive Analytics6.1195 Ratings9.98 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining5.62 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
7.8
297 Ratings
8% below category average
Wolfram Mathematica
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)6.6276 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model8.5272 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)7.4275 Ratings00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.9218 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
7.5
221 Ratings
3% below category average
Wolfram Mathematica
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access8.0215 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application8.0133 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile9.0185 Ratings00 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
8.4
145 Ratings
8% above category average
Wolfram Mathematica
-
Ratings
REST API8.0125 Ratings00 Ratings
Javascript API8.594 Ratings00 Ratings
iFrames8.094 Ratings00 Ratings
Java API8.571 Ratings00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)8.597 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)8.984 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)Wolfram Mathematica
Small Businesses
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10
Supermetrics
Supermetrics
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Supermetrics
Supermetrics
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
IBM Analytics Engine
IBM Analytics Engine
Score 7.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)Wolfram Mathematica
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(331 ratings)
9.9
(9 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.4
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(14 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(9 ratings)
9.5
(2 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)Wolfram Mathematica
Likelihood to Recommend
Qlik
Qlik Sense is a program whose purpose is to greatly improve all your operations and use of all data in an organic way. The mission will always be to increase the economic and commercial processes of the company in a short time. I recommended it for its high technology, which was Created for this area, the results are successful. We have noticed how it has increased relationships with our clients thanks to the credibility and security that we provide.
Read full review
Wolfram
We are the judgement that Wolfram Mathematica is despite many critics based on the paradigms selected a mark in the fields of the markets for computations of all kind. Wolfram Mathematica is even a choice in fields where other bolide systems reign most of the market. Wolfram Mathematica offers rich flexibility and internally standardizes the right methodologies for his user community. Wolfram Mathematica is not cheap and in need of a hard an long learner journey. That makes it weak in comparison with of-the-shelf-solution packages or even other programming languages. But for systematization of methods Wolfram Mathematica is far in front of almost all the other. Scientist and interested people are able to develop themself further and Wolfram Matheamatica users are a human variant for themself. The reach out for modern mathematics based science is deep and a unique unified framework makes the whole field of mathematics accessable comparable to the brain of Albert Einstein. The paradigms incorporated are the most efficients and consist in assembly on the market. The mathematics is covering and fullfills not just education requirements but the demands and needs of experts.
Mathematica is incompatible with other systems for mCAx and therefore the borders between the systems are hard to overcome. Wolfram Mathematica should be consider one of the more open systems because other code can be imported and run but on the export side it is rathe incompatible by design purposes. A better standard for all that might solve the crisis but there is none in sight. Selection of knowledge of what works will be in the future even more focussed and general system might be one the lossy side. Knowledge of esthetics of what will be in the highest demand in necessary and Wolfram is not a leader in this field of science. Mathematics leves from gathering problems from application fields and less from the glory of itself and the formalization of this.
Read full review
Pros
Qlik
  • Flexibility in data recording, from the app, as well as in handling them. Allowing you to view reports quickly and effectively.
  • Easy to generate dynamic graphics according to our needs.
  • It is very easy to use, intuitive, so it does not generate costs in the learning process compared to the tool with collaborators
Read full review
Wolfram
  • It allows straightforward integration of analytic analysis of algebraic expressions and their numerical implemented.
  • Supports varying programmatic paradigms, so one can choose what best fits the problem or task: pure functions, procedural programming, list processing, and even (with a bit of setup) object-oriented programming.
  • The extensive and rich tools for graphical rendering make it very easy to not just get 2D and 3D renderings of final output, but also to do quick-and-dirty 2D and 3D rendering of intermediate results and/or debugging results.
Read full review
Cons
Qlik
  • Scalability is RAM limited, all data is associative and in-memory so server's RAM is directly proportional to performance
  • Limitation on advanced analytics capabilities in the form of R integration to perform complex statistical and analytical calculations
  • Can have more intuitive interface
Read full review
Wolfram
  • Should include more libraries and functions.
  • Should include more functions that can be used in Machine Learning.
  • Should include more functions that can be used in Data Science.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Qlik
Qlik Sense is a constantly improving it's software and working with its' users to make it better. They are great at keeping their users informed of progress and care about delivering a quality product
Read full review
Wolfram
No answers on this topic
Usability
Qlik
Qlik Sense has a better and easy to learn user interface compared with other analytics tool which always help us to create regular and adhoc reports within the stipulated time frame and can be easily refreshed at a scheduled time and sent to multiple stakeholders for timely update regarding the Key metrics indicator.
Read full review
Wolfram
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Qlik
Qlik is great for companies with lots of business domains and departments because it scales well, especially if data that is reported is saved in SQL and similar structures. Its ease of use and good UI enables business units to create and manage their own reports. That removes a great burden of creating and managing/modifying these pages from the IT team. Overall, it's a win-win for both IT and business units.
Read full review
Wolfram
Wolfram Mathematica is a nice software package. It has very nice features and easy to install and use in your machine. Besides this, there is a nice support from Wolfram. They come to the university frequently to give seminars in Mathematica. I think this is the best thing they are doing. That is very helpful for graduate and undergraduate students who are using Mathematica in their research.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Qlik
The instructor was very knowledgeable.
Read full review
Wolfram
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Qlik
The online instructor was very knowledgeable.
Read full review
Wolfram
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Qlik
Hire Qlik consultants. It's better done by them or with their aid.
Read full review
Wolfram
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Qlik
The customization of the platform opens up plenty of other options depending on the use cases. The API layer is incredibly rich and makes integration of Qlik based visualization into web pages a simple and effective pattern. It's been very easy to use with a great community made up of professionals. Qlik Sense has introduces artificial Intelligence into my data visualization and reporting activity.
Read full review
Wolfram
We have evaluated and are using in some cases the Python language in concert with the Jupyter notebook interface. For UI, we using libraries like React to create visually stunning visualizations of such models. Mathematica compares favorably to this alternative in terms of speed of development. Mathematica compares unfavorably to this alternative in terms of license costs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Qlik
  • Once an app is published and running good, we can quickly see the time we save to analyze data.
  • It's hard sometimes to realize the money we save by using this system.
  • People start understanding the power of data and asking more questions.
Read full review
Wolfram
  • Easy to solve huge mathematical equations, so it saved time there
  • Doing analysis and plotting graphs is also another plus point
  • Learning is very slow, and it took lot of time to learn its scripting language
Read full review
ScreenShots

Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense) Screenshots

Screenshot of Qlik Sense Cash Flow DashboardScreenshot of Qlik Sense Global Smart SearchScreenshot of Qlik Sense Smart Data Compression - Get immediate insight on large dataScreenshot of Extend, mix and mash-up with our APIsScreenshot of Add "External data" with Qlik DataMarket - Data as a ServiceScreenshot of Visualization Bundle