Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization vs. vRealize Operations (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenShift Virtualization is a feature of Red Hat OpenShift that offers a unified, scalable platform for migrating traditional VMs. It ensures consistent management across hybrid cloud environments and supports modernization efforts.N/A
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
vRealize Operations, or Aria Operations, provided simplified and automated IT Operations Management across private, hybrid, and multi-cloud environments, and visibility into the entire tech stack, including all physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructure components. The product is no longer available for sale.N/A
Pricing
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationvRealize Operations (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationvRealize Operations (discontinued)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationvRealize Operations (discontinued)
Considered Both Products
Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
its great and I would reccomend it to for managing VM's and helping to transition the workloads to a more container workflow
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
They go hand in hand, makes sense for someone with knowledge if both. Creates the ecosystem with single management plane.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
I choose those products because in my organization we use a lot. As well, those products are very important for our improvement.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Microsoft Windows
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
They are all perfectly serviceable options but Red Hat virtualization seemed like a better fit for our technical needs, our existing environment, and the quality of our vendor relationship.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Azure VMware Solution, Oracle Virtualization and Nutanix AHV
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure, Hyper-V and SUSE Rancher
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Proxmox VE and VMware ESXi
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Proxmox VE
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
We do Ansible Automation Platform to facilitate our code deployments, to resolve vulnerabilities etc and that does simplify the work that we do. Likewise, OpenShift Virtualization helps simplify operating system maintenance etc
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
I haven't used it yet.

aun no lo utilizo
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
It is better from the point of view of costs, but also provides a better management and extended features.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Nothing like OpenShift. Actually, this was our first one. We toyed with maybe doing raw Kubernetes, but with an enterprise company you need an enterprise product.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
SUSE Rancher
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
It was microsoft hypervisor and vmware.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Cisco Compute Hyperconverged with Nutanix
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
OpenShift is moving in the direction of VMware and is a good first step in the process.
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Chose vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Much compatibility with our VMware Infrastructure.
Chose vRealize Operations (discontinued)
SCOM was quite overwhelming when we first set up a POC for it. There was just too much for one person to handle. With vROPs I can manage the product and provide the support needed for my environment. We also have a Solarwinds environment that provides us with a level of detail …
Chose vRealize Operations (discontinued)
We have not tried any other products yet however I hear that turbonomic is a big competitor.
Chose vRealize Operations (discontinued)
We are a VMware shop and need monitoring from VMware. Also, I am not the decision maker here. I believe because of being a VMware shop we choose VRO and also may be my company got a great deal. I like this product although there is a lot of stuff to improve.
Best Alternatives
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationvRealize Operations (discontinued)
Small Businesses
Hyper-V
Hyper-V
Score 8.2 out of 10
Hyper-V
Hyper-V
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationvRealize Operations (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.2
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationvRealize Operations (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
I believe that Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization is a very promising option for hypervisor at the moment and it seems to be improving quickly. Red Hat is doing a great job working with customers on feature set requests and improving UX and stability
Read full review
With the introduction of API-based event alerts, there is no need for a proxy, which is a good option. Its ability to manage infra on a real-time basis is a good option that helps monitor, administer and troubleshoot virtual machines.
Read full review
Pros
  • Easiness of deployment, we can deploy the full stack completely and hardened easier than other container products
  • Used to host different workloads (CNF and VNF).
  • Easy to scale on both the worker and the infra layer
  • Infra nodes do not require subscriptions, which means we are only paying for our workload only, and no hidden costs.
Read full review
  • Troubleshooting Workbench to work on multiple data at one place.
  • Datacenter Resources/ Cost Optimization Suggestions.
  • Centralized Management between on-premises and cloud resources.
  • Customized management packs.
Read full review
Cons
  • Because of how different virtualization is done, there is a learning curve to overcome when switching to it from another hypervisor.
  • Documentation needs to be improved. Just finding the details to set it up is a burden that will keep some people using it.
Read full review
  • If we can integrate it with other products, then it will be quite useful. Integration with some network devices and storage devices would be useful.
  • It basically supports the system with big-size VM disks; it should be made available to support other devices and hardware as well.
  • They may also need to improve on complex configuration.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenShift is really easy of use through its management console. OpenShift gives a very large flexibility through many inbuilt functionalities, all gathered in the same place (it's a very convenient tool to learn DevOps technics hands on) OpenShift is an ideal integrated development / deployment platform for containers
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The product is maturing at an amazing rate, but there is still work to do to reach existing VMware customers. Most notably are the HA/DR features, and backup/recovery. We need to have faster backup capabilities, and I know this is in the works with change block tracking - but it is a challenge today. Some users are also scared by the number of volumes created by Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization, as opposed to the number of VMFS volumes they are used to.
Read full review
It has a good GUI to monitor real-time logs for cloud applications. This is quite a useful tool and preferred over most of the competitive applications in the market.
Read full review
Performance
We have already hab cases in which our customers have a better application performance even in legacy architectures running on Jboss, and even more on cloud native architectures. Customers who hosted their applications on Jboss and wildfly, when running on top of Red Hat OpenShift could benefit from more stability and availability, and in some cases, gains of performance.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Speedy support
Read full review
The support is pretty good however some of the KB articles still reference different versions of the product so it can be hard to find answers to common questions
Read full review
Implementation Rating
The learning curve is quite high but worth it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Some of the various other Kubernetes out there, including Rancher, is probably one of the biggest one. Rancher has a reputation for being very easy to implement. I've found that Red Hat OpenShift is just as easy to implement as Rancher. People just don't really know about it. Nutanix is another hypervisor out there competing with Red Hat OpenShift. Again, I think OpenShift virtualization but maybe isn't as old as Nutanix. I do feel it's more mature.
Read full review
We are a VMware shop and need monitoring from VMware. Also, I am not the decision maker here. I believe because of being a VMware shop we choose VRO and also may be my company got a great deal. I like this product although there is a lot of stuff to improve
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has allowed us to see where we need to be in the container world. I'm going to call it a net neutral impact, not negative or positive. It has given us a sense of what we are ready for and what we're not ready for. You know where you stand.
  • You don't know what you don't know, so it helps us know what we want to know.
Read full review
  • We believe that the ability to preplan deployments with vRealize has proven its return on investments.
  • Our troubleshooting time has been reduced with vrealize because its constantly collecting performance data. typically vrealize will tell us cause of fault before we can determine it ourselves.
Read full review
ScreenShots