Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon Redshift
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Redshift is a hosted data warehouse solution, from Amazon Web Services.
$0.24
per GB per month
SingleStore
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
SingleStore aims to enable organizations to scale from one to one million customers, handling SQL, JSON, full text and vector workloads in one unified platform.
$0.69
per hour
Pricing
Amazon RedshiftSingleStore
Editions & Modules
Redshift Managed Storage
$0.24
per GB per month
Current Generation
$0.25 - $13.04
per hour
Previous Generation
$0.25 - $4.08
per hour
Redshift Spectrum
$5.00
per terabyte of data scanned
OnDemand
$0.69
per hour
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon RedshiftSingleStore
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon RedshiftSingleStore
Considered Both Products
Amazon Redshift

No answer on this topic

SingleStore
Chose SingleStore
It has more APIs and other access methods. It has a multi-version concurrency control (MVCC) Distributed RDBMS that combines an in-memory row-oriented and a disc-based column-oriented storage with patented universal storage to handle transactional and analytical workloads in …
Chose SingleStore
SingleStore is built for fast data ingestion and fast queries against large tables (> billions of rows). This is possible because of the column store engine that SingleStore uses. SingleStore also support a memory engine. Pipelines is also another big advantage. Being able to …
Chose SingleStore
The in-memory tech is the best in class. If perf. is the hard limit then this is the No.1 to go.
When data scales up, the cost of maintaining a big cluster with memory keep increasing (both the infrastructure cost and licensing cost) becomes high. Also the balance between …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Amazon RedshiftSingleStore
Small Businesses
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Score 8.7 out of 10
Google Cloud SQL
Google Cloud SQL
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Snowflake
Snowflake
Score 8.9 out of 10
Snowflake
Snowflake
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Snowflake
Snowflake
Score 8.9 out of 10
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon RedshiftSingleStore
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(38 ratings)
8.7
(67 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(5 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(10 ratings)
8.3
(8 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(41 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(7 ratings)
7.5
(8 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(2 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon RedshiftSingleStore
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
If the number of connections is expected to be low, but the amounts of data are large or projected to grow it is a good solutions especially if there is previous exposure to PostgreSQL. Speaking of Postgres, Redshift is based on several versions old releases of PostgreSQL so the developers would not be able to take advantage of some of the newer SQL language features. The queries need some fine-tuning still, indexing is not provided, but playing with sorting keys becomes necessary. Lastly, there is no notion of the Primary Key in Redshift so the business must be prepared to explain why duplication occurred (must be vigilant for)
Read full review
SingleStore
Well-Suited Scenarios: Real-Time Analytics: Financial trading platforms requiring instant insights. Operational Dashboards: Retail businesses monitoring live sales. IoT Data Processing: Smart device monitoring with high data ingestion. Fraud Detection: Banks detect suspicious transactions instantly. Less Appropriate Scenarios: Archival Storage: Cold data storage with infrequent access. Low-Volume Workloads: Small-scale apps with minimal data processing needs. Complex ETL Pipelines: Heavy data transformations without real-time demands.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • [Amazon] Redshift has Distribution Keys. If you correctly define them on your tables, it improves Query performance. For instance, we can define Mapping/Meta-data tables with Distribution-All Key, so that it gets replicated across all the nodes, for fast joins and fast query results.
  • [Amazon] Redshift has Sort Keys. If you correctly define them on your tables along with above Distribution Keys, it further improves your Query performance. It also has Composite Sort Keys and Interleaved Sort Keys, to support various use cases
  • [Amazon] Redshift is forked out of PostgreSQL DB, and then AWS added "MPP" (Massively Parallel Processing) and "Column Oriented" concepts to it, to make it a powerful data store.
  • [Amazon] Redshift has "Analyze" operation that could be performed on tables, which will update the stats of the table in leader node. This is sort of a ledger about which data is stored in which node and which partition with in a node. Up to date stats improves Query performance.
Read full review
SingleStore
  • Technical support is stellar -- far above and beyond anything I've experienced with any other company.
  • When we compared SingleStore to other databases two years ago, we found SingleStore performance to be far superior.
  • Pipeline data ingestion is exceptionally fast.
  • The ability to combine transactional and analytical workloads without compromising performance is very impressive.
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • We've experienced some problems with hanging queries on Redshift Spectrum/external tables. We've had to roll back to and old version of Redshift while we wait for AWS to provide a patch.
  • Redshift's dialect is most similar to that of PostgreSQL 8. It lacks many modern features and data types.
  • Constraints are not enforced. We must rely on other means to verify the integrity of transformed tables.
Read full review
SingleStore
  • It does not release a patch to have back porting; it just releases a new version and stops support; it's difficult to keep up to that pace.
  • Support engineers lack expertise, but they seem to be improving organically.
  • Lacks enterprise CDC capability: Change data capture (CDC) is a process that tracks and records changes made to data in a database and then delivers those changes to other systems in real time.
  • For enterprise-level backup & restore capability, we had to implement our model via Velero snapshot backup.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
SingleStore
We haven't seen a faster relation database. Period. Which is why we are super happy customers and will for sure renew our license.
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
Just very happy with the product, it fits our needs perfectly. Amazon pioneered the cloud and we have had a positive experience using RedShift. Really cool to be able to see your data housed and to be able to query and perform administrative tasks with ease.
Read full review
SingleStore
[Until it is] supported on AWS ECS containers, I will reserve a higher rating for SingleStore. Right now it works well on EC2 and serves our current purpose, [but] would look forward to seeing SingleStore respond to our urge of feature in a shorter time period with high quality and security.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
SingleStore
I really can't remember a time when it was not available
Read full review
Performance
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
SingleStore
SingleStore Performance is excellent and concurrency that it supports is amazing compared to other DB technologies. It scales out pretty well by adding leaf nodes as the data grows. Pipelines are the strongest feature of SingleStore, which eliminates writing manual code to ingest data from Kafka, S3, and Hadoop systems, and it does that parallelly.
Read full review
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
The support was great and helped us in a timely fashion. We did use a lot of online forums as well, but the official documentation was an ongoing one, and it did take more time for us to look through it. We would have probably chosen a competitor product had it not been for the great support
Read full review
SingleStore
Very responsive to trouble tickets - Often, I think, the SingleStore's monitoring systems have already alerted the engineers by the time I get around to writing a ticket (about 10 - 20 mins after we see a problem). I feel like things are escalated nicely and SingleStore takes resolving trouble tickets seriously. Also SingleStore follows up after incidents to with a post mortem and actionable takaways to improve the product. Very satisfied here.
Read full review
Online Training
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
SingleStore
Would prefer in person training but for online training, it's almost as good as in person
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
SingleStore
We allowed 2-3 months for a thorough evaluation. We saw pretty quickly that we were likely to pick SingleStore, so we ported some of our stored procedures to SingleStore in order to take a deeper look. Two SingleStore people worked closely with us to ensure that we did not have any blocking problems. It all went remarkably smoothly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
Than Vertica: Redshift is cheaper and AWS integrated (which was a plus because the whole company was on AWS).
Than BigQuery: Redshift has a standard SQL interface, though recently I heard good things about BigQuery and would try it out again.
Than Hive: Hive is great if you are in the PB+ range, but latencies tend to be much slower than Redshift and it is not suited for ad-hoc applications.
Read full review
SingleStore
SingleStore is built for fast data ingestion and fast queries against large tables (> billions of rows). This is possible because of the column store engine that SingleStore uses. SingleStore also support a memory engine. Pipelines is also another big advantage. Being able to ingest data from S3 (and loading new data) without adding any additional services (with just 1 SQL query) is pretty cool. SingleStore is also pushing hard with vector engine. It is becoming a single storage solution.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Amazon AWS
Redshift is relatively cheaper tool but since the pricing is dynamic, there is always a risk of exceeding the cost. Since most of our team is using it as self serve and there is no continuous tracking by a dedicated team, it really needs time & effort on analyst's side to know how much it is going to cost.
Read full review
SingleStore
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
SingleStore
Very reliable. Coming from mariadb, singlestore has made our application more reliable and faster!
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Our company is moving to the AWS infrastructure, and in this context moving the warehouse environments to Redshift sounds logical regardless of the cost.
  • Development organizations have to operate in the Dev/Ops mode where they build and support their apps at the same time.
  • Hard to estimate the overall ROI of moving to Redshift from my position. However, running Redshift seems to be inexpensive compared to all the licensing and hardware costs we had on our RDBMS platform before Redshift.
Read full review
SingleStore
  • As the overall performance and functionality were expanded, we are able to deliver our data much faster than before, which increases the demand for data.
  • Metadata is available in the platform by default, like metadata on the pipelines. Also, the information schema has lots of metadata, making it easy to load our assets to the data catalog.
Read full review
ScreenShots