Responsive vs. eOriginal, with SmartSign, from Wolters Kluwer

eOriginal, with SmartSign, from Wolters Kluwer

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Responsive	Score 8.9 out of 10	N/A	Responsive (formerly RFPIO), headquartered in Beaverton, offers their proposal management and automation software, featuring import and export, proposal knowledgebase and answer library, evaluation intake forms, and project management tools (e.g. Gantt chart) associated to proposal tracking.	N/A
eOriginal, with SmartSign, from Wolters Kluwer	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	eOriginal, now from Wolters Kluwer (acquired December 2020) is a suite of tools providing eAsset Management, a purpose-built solution delivering Digital Asset Certainty, the assurance that digital loans are created, stored and assigned in full accordance with all compliance standards for the industry, and maintaining the highest level of legal enforceability throughout a digital loan’s lifecycle. eOriginal also includes SmartSign, an electronic signature software offering that includes features…	N/A

Pricing

Responsive

eOriginal, with SmartSign, from Wolters Kluwer

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Responsive	eOriginal, with SmartSign, from Wolters Kluwer
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Pricing Info

Community Pulse
	Responsive	eOriginal, with SmartSign, from Wolters Kluwer

Features

Responsive

eOriginal, with SmartSign, from Wolters Kluwer

Proposal Creation & Organization

Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Product A and Product B
	Responsive 7.5 28 Ratings 4% below category average	eOriginal, with SmartSign, from Wolters Kluwer - Ratings
Proposal branding	7.515 Ratings	00 Ratings
Proposal templates	7.322 Ratings	00 Ratings
Proposal content library updates	6.728 Ratings	00 Ratings
Guided proposal creation	8.816 Ratings	00 Ratings
Searchable proposal database	7.026 Ratings	00 Ratings

Proposal Collaboration & Workflow

Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Product A and Product B
	Responsive 7.8 27 Ratings 1% below category average	eOriginal, with SmartSign, from Wolters Kluwer - Ratings
RFP management & response	8.527 Ratings	00 Ratings
Proposal collaboration & approval	8.026 Ratings	00 Ratings
User permissions/proposal editing controls	8.125 Ratings	00 Ratings
Sales proposal workflow	7.919 Ratings	00 Ratings
Proposal automation user interface	6.523 Ratings	00 Ratings

Proposal Delivery

Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Product A and Product B
	Responsive 8.2 20 Ratings 4% above category average	eOriginal, with SmartSign, from Wolters Kluwer - Ratings
Proposal distribution	8.014 Ratings	00 Ratings
Interactive proposals	8.07 Ratings	00 Ratings
Proposal content tracking	8.518 Ratings	00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Responsive	eOriginal, with SmartSign, from Wolters Kluwer
Small Businesses	QuoteWerks Score 9.7 out of 10	airSlate WorkFlow Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	QuoteWerks Score 9.7 out of 10	Foxit PDF Editor Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises	Conga CLM Score 8.8 out of 10	Conga Composer Score 8.4 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Responsive	eOriginal, with SmartSign, from Wolters Kluwer
Likelihood to Recommend	9.3 (21 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	8.7 (16 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	10.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	9.8 (17 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	10.0 (2 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Responsive	eOriginal, with SmartSign, from Wolters Kluwer
Likelihood to Recommend	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) 1. RFPIO is perfect for searching for specific information when you are responding to an RFP. Search engine is powerful. We narrow our search using several customized filters and know we are getting a thorough search. 2. Excel responses work very well in RFPIO. 3. Typical RFPs that are formatted in Word are challenging to run via RFPIO. We struggle with this. 4. We have yet to master the template. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Wolters Kluwer No answers on this topic
Pros	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) Live collaboration - the ability for multiple experts to simultaneously work on the same RFP. Artificial intelligence - the ability for the product to continually learn what the best answers are and serve them up to our teams. Dynamic branding - the ability for custom brand different templates by vertical, line of business, local branding, etc. with seamless transition. Content review & moderation - the ability for our national content team to bulk review, edit and share content with our teams in a methodical way. Incentivized Hope Henderson Marketing Communication Coordinator Read full review	Wolters Kluwer No answers on this topic
Cons	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) Reporting and Analytics is basic, you can purchase advanced analytics though It would have been nice to have a set structure in mind or a example/case study to structure our responses in the most appropriate way, but we are working through that with their stellar support team Really great new features, but expensive Incentivized Brendan Blok Sr. Global Business Advisor Read full review	Wolters Kluwer No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) This tool has been fantastic as we have revamped our RFP process. We are much faster and far more efficient.Our win rate is up, but I am not 100% sure this is the cause, but I love to see it. The customer support and training are also fantastic. Thumbs up! Incentivized Lawrence Kaiser Vice President of Marketing and Communications Read full review	Wolters Kluwer No answers on this topic
Usability	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) Very easy to navigate and use. Very intuitive user interface Incentivized Lawrence Kaiser Vice President of Marketing and Communications Read full review	Wolters Kluwer No answers on this topic
Support Rating	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) The team at RFPIO is extremely responsive. If I email our account manager or report a bug, I usually hear back within two hours. Additionally, they are quick to make software adjustments based on customer requests and needs. We had a really complicated Excel sheet that their team ended up having to upload for me because of the amount of manual work I was doing. Based on that, they updated the software within two release cycles to make the process more automated, so that future Excel uploads would be more streamlined. I have also had several suggestions implemented rather quickly, and they don't hesitate to reach out for clarification when needed. Carah Counts Product Manager Read full review	Wolters Kluwer No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) We were able to complete an RFP during our free trial. We were already leaning toward RFPIO but that pushed us over the edge. Carah Counts Product Manager Read full review	Wolters Kluwer No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) I was not involved in the process of selecting RFP360 for our firm, so I am largely unfamiliar with competitors. I am, however, quite pleased with RFP360 as a user, and am confident that my colleagues who were responsible for making the decision were thorough and discerning. Incentivized Rick Harris Principal Read full review	Wolters Kluwer No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) Library Health Dashboard is helpful in reducing time to clean up content but could use additional improvement by showing more granular data instead of a global assessment like good, poor, moderate. ROI is reduced for us because of additional cost for using AI Overall, Responsive has significantly improved our proposal process. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Wolters Kluwer No answers on this topic
ScreenShots	Responsive Screenshots