Rinkt vs. SAP Build

Based on my experience Rinkt is well suited for any day to day task that requires data entry, repetitive work, it can help you with controlling tasks redirecting emails, generally in accounting from invoicing to entering receipts into accounting programs. It can help with marketing tasks. I don't see an area where Rinkt is less appropriate for day to day tasks.

SAP Build is a strong and reliable partner with a rich FAQ and consulting power. New features make sense and are easy to distribute within the team and to end users. The community is nice, and there are many discussions on product development, shared solutions, and productivity improvements. UI is also one of the strongest points.

Incentivized

• It is very easy to use.
• It is very well implemented.
• All the features helps us in every day tasks reducing the human error factor.

• SAP Build Workzone is a cloud ready service that it can provide access to users over cloud. It really liked it because for Non-SAP users they don't need to have seperate logins to access SAP systems
• SAP Build LCNC helps to create an app either from scratch or take reference from existing apps and develop on top of it
• SAP Build Code is pro-developer tool helps for creating enterprise ready web apps

Incentivized

• Since the development of the AI it is always improving

• Comparing to other RPA Tools, SAP Build automation lacks enough user guidance.
• Licensing is a little bit confusing.
• From a technical perspective, older versions of the automation part are not always stable, but the other services (workflow, business rules, apps, etc.) are much more stable.

Incentivized

SAP Build that enables rapid creation of enterprise-grade applications, automations, and business sites. It empowers both business users and developers to collaborate effectively while leveraging SAP-grade security, identity, and integration capabilities. SAP Build integrates seamlessly with SAP systems, supports governance and lifecycle management, and accelerates digital transformation by reducing development time and effort.

Incentivized

The robot is very easy to user and it can actually perform the day to day tasks faster and more securely, leaving the employ time to focus on tasks more important than data entry, invoicing or redirecting email as example of tasks I referred to when I said day to day tasks.

SAP Build app developed using drag and drop interface and it is easy to for every one to use. Yes, but still prior knowledge is required for logic development and process flow automation. UI design part is easy but the mapping and the process flow needs to be mapped accurately so that desired results get

There are, for example, great blog writings about automation cases and examples. The studio version is updated often. There are also useful OpenSAP online courses.

Incentivized

Online training helped to understand the drag and drop processes, building UI. Creating a workflow and process automation. Developing workflow and deploying WF. Helped to reduce the errors. It helped to understand the training easily. And online training gave good insights for low code no code solutions and create actions, forms.

SAP Build stacks up well against the others in terms of what our business needs in order to succeed. It's more of a necessity than the others, but we keep them in mind as we utilize SAP Build. SAP Build's fluidity is great, but it could also be due to our lead user of the softwarre.

Incentivized

• Rinkt has a positive impact in our overall business objectives

• SAP Build apps has a high ROI. Development is fast and cloud pricing is good.
• Business objectives are handled better than any other solution for custom app development in the SAP ecosystem.
• Process Automation workflows are very fast to develop, mostly graphically, and work very well.

Incentivized