Rocketlane vs. Workamajig

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Rocketlane
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
As per the information provided by the vendor, Rocketlane is a platform specifically designed to cater to onboarding, implementation, and professional services teams. The primary objective of this platform is to enhance collaboration with customers, optimize project delivery efficiency, and augment customer experience and accountability. Its target audience primarily includes industries such as CS (Customer Success) and Professional Services. It emphasizes its capability to expedite time-to…N/A
Workamajig
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Workamajig is a project management system with capabilities such as file sharing, resource management, and revenue projection.
$41
per month per user
Pricing
RocketlaneWorkamajig
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
In-house
$41
per month per user
Agency
$41
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
RocketlaneWorkamajig
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
RocketlaneWorkamajig
Considered Both Products
Rocketlane
Chose Rocketlane
Ease of User, User Friendliness, Customer Onboarding, Task Management, Effective & Efficient communication, Project Management, E-mail reminders/notifications, Publishing status report, Overview of all projects, Templates, Resource management, Timesheet
Chose Rocketlane
The older one was no as good as Rocketlane because the User interface and UI are most important to use any software for the end user. Because more easy to understand, and easier to adapt the software. Thanks, Rocketplane I really like rocketplane because of its features and …
Chose Rocketlane
Rocketlane was extremely easy to stand up and get running. Both our internal teams and customers have been fans of the process so far. We had our first projects set up, with our Salesforce sync and white-labeled branding all live within the first week.
Chose Rocketlane
For our specific needs, Rocketlane fits the bill perfectly. It had just the right amount of features without it being overly complicated to teach the client. The pricing also worked out well: just pay monthly licenses per user.
Chose Rocketlane
Rocketlane is more robust for onboarding than monday.com with better customer interface. However, Rocketlane does not have some of the advanced features of ChurnZero or GUIDEcx. However, Rocketlane's pricing is aligned well with the features they offer.
Workamajig
Chose Workamajig
Workamajig was selected over a decade ago when there were very few project management platforms that has integrations with other platforms, support for Agile, KanBan, etc etc. Most of the other offerings did not offer the type of security available with us hosting an on …
Chose Workamajig
Workamajig definitely isn't the prettiest among the project management tools I've used, nor does it have the friendliest UX/UI. But it does have some advantages when it comes to automating tasks in a schedule, automatically replacing versions of files with the same name and …
Chose Workamajig
We've used QuickBooks and it didn't align well with our business, so there were a lot of insights I wanted from the numbers, but couldn't get. We use Basecamp, which is easy, but can get disorganized pretty quickly and takes discipline to stay structured.
Chose Workamajig
WMJ is a fully integrated system. Accounting, time management, invoicing, project management, estimating, sales CRM, all occur in one integrated package. This is ultimately why we selected WMJ. Other packages do portions of the workflow well but don't always integrate via …
Chose Workamajig
Workamajig was definitely a lot easier to keep track of projects, timesheets, and out of office calendars all in one. ClickUp and Zoho were good for project management but JIG definitely has more to offer and it's a little easier to clean. Keeping track of campaigns is much …
Chose Workamajig
Personally WMJ is my least favorite project management program of those I've used in jobs past, but it was not my decision to use it and I believe our company has been utilizing it for many, many years. To be fair and put this in perspective, my interactions with WMJ probably …
Chose Workamajig
Customization and Project Request submission were two of the biggest draws that our organization valued back when our contract with Workamajig started. Those two features were deemed more important than some of its inadequacies. However, the project management products have …
Chose Workamajig
Daylite is not as robust of a program but their mobile options are far superior and are best for smaller companies.
Chose Workamajig
The UI is probably the worst I have used. The redundancy in completing tasks is annoying. I did not choose this product.
Features
RocketlaneWorkamajig
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Rocketlane
8.4
Ratings
9% above category average
Workamajig
4.9
Ratings
45% below category average
Task Management9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Resource Management8.00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Gantt Charts8.00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Scheduling9.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Workflow Automation8.00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Team Collaboration10.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology9.00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology5.00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Document Management8.00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Email integration9.00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Rocketlane
-
Ratings
Workamajig
6.7
Ratings
14% below category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
RocketlaneWorkamajig
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.8 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
RocketlaneWorkamajig
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
RocketlaneWorkamajig
Likelihood to Recommend
There is project management tracking from the start till the end (onboarding till hypercare). The bifurcation of project stages and pre-built templates is good; you can assign client tasks. Less appropriate: Raising tickets for developers because there is no escalation management option. Let’s say the developer didn’t reply in 24 hours for a high-priority task; this should be automatically escalated to their senior.
Read full review
I think this holds true to almost any CRM, but if you want to truly utilize it you sort of need to go all in. This can become tough with WMJ because it doesn't offer some critical options that many other CRMs do, like the ability to create and send emails, e-newsletters, to throttle and invite outside clients to look at projects, etc. As such we're pairing Workamajig with Hubspot (and slowly phasing out Mailchimp) and trying to keep the data clean and flowing between them all is pretty tough. I'm also not aware of any API bridge from Wordpress to Workamajig so while I can program and feed my leads from my site into the other spaces, Workamajig remains a manual entry for any insertions you want, even if simply as a CSV import.
But - if you're not worried about that and simply want to manage projects, budget time, and scope things, it's a robust system allowing you to do so.
Read full review
Pros
  • The project timelines and tasks feature is nice.
  • Status updates can be published, which can be seen by external stakeholders/clients even though they are not on Rocketlane or they have not taken Rocketlane subscriptions.
  • Timesheets can be easily tracked through which resource utilization can be planned.
Read full review
  • WMJ is a full-stack solution, so you can track the life of a project from beginning to end, and all of the financials associated with it.
  • Time entry is easy.
  • Project management is robust and yields a tremendous amount of information.
  • WMJ has a "sheets"-based interface, which makes navigating thru modules easier.
  • There is more than one way to complete any particular task.
Read full review
Cons
  • Project Opening time
  • Automated time tracked should be there
  • Every phase has a option to make a call and zoom so time tracked real time
Read full review
  • Auto-schedule population - The most inconvenient thing about using JIG was that the dates wouldn't auto-populate. Example: I move the review date but the rest of the dates stay the same. Depending on each project level, if one date is adjusted the rest should update as well. That way we aren't spending a lot of time moving dates around manually.
  • Notifications - JIG should have desktop notifications so we can see when tasks are on us even when we aren't in JIG.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It really helps to support us in supporting our customers.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Because of the impact, it has created in terms of saving resources and time by helping them with project-related timelines.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Ease of User, User Friendliness, Customer Onboarding, Task Management, Effective & Efficient communication, Project Management, E-mail reminders/notifications, Publishing status report, Overview of all projects, Templates, Resource management, Timesheet
Read full review
We've used QuickBooks and it didn't align well with our business, so there were a lot of insights I wanted from the numbers, but couldn't get. We use Basecamp, which is easy, but can get disorganized pretty quickly and takes discipline to stay structured.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • As an admin and end-user, Rocketlane has saved me at least four hours of work every week. Multiply that across the entire team, and we're saving two full days of work by removing all the manual tasks.
Read full review
  • The subscription expense and IT overhead has been substantial. That being said at the time of implementation, most other competing platforms were in line with their pricing.
  • As more competitive alternatives have come to market we would have probably gone with an entirely cloud base alternative at a lower price.
  • We ended up with ClickUp as our primary project management platform. If our finance/accounting software wasn't already so integrated with Workamjig we would probably switch to it entirely.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Rocketlane Screenshots

Screenshot of Project ListsScreenshot of Project PlanScreenshot of Status UpdateScreenshot of Customer ViewScreenshot of TemplateScreenshot of Documents