Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience vs. Syncfusion Essential Studio

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
The Salesforce Platform is designed for building and deploying scalable cloud applications with managed hardware provisioning and app stacks. Lightning Web Components are used by developers to build reusable UI components.
$25
Per User Per Month
Syncfusion Essential Studio
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Since 2002, Essential Studio® has supported the development of software applications across industries and economic sectors, in both public and private enterprises.
$0
*The Syncfusion Essential Studio Community License includes free access to all 1,600+ controls and is available to companies and individuals with less than $1 million USD in annual gross revenue, 5 or fewer developers, and 10 or fewer total employees. Note: An entity or organization may not have ever received more than $3,000,000 USD in capital from an outside source, such as private equity or venture capital, in order to be eligible for the Community License.
Pricing
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer ExperienceSyncfusion Essential Studio
Editions & Modules
Starter
$25.00
Per User Per Month
Plus
$100.00
Per User Per Month
1. Syncfusion Essential Studio Community License
$0
*The Syncfusion Essential Studio Community License includes free access to all 1,600+ controls and is available to companies and individuals with less than $1 million USD in annual gross revenue, 5 or fewer developers, and 10 or fewer total employees. Note: An entity or organization may not have ever received more than $3,000,000 USD in capital from an outside source, such as private equity or venture capital, in order to be eligible for the Community License.
2. Essential Studio UI Edition
Custom Quote
per year Packages to suit teams of all sizes
3. Essential Studio Document SDK
Custom Quote
per year Packages to suit teams of all sizes
5. Essential Studio Standalone Document SDKs
Custom Quote
per year PDF Viewer SDK; DOCX Editor SDK; Spreadsheet Editor SDK
4. Essential Studio Standalone UI SDKs
Custom Quote
per year Grid SDK*; Chart SDK*; Schedular SDK; Gantt SDK; Rich Text Editor SDK; Diagram SDK; File Manager SDK*
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer ExperienceSyncfusion Essential Studio
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details*Grid SDK, Chart SDK, and File Manager SDK are also included as part of the Essential Studio UI Edition. **The Syncfusion Essential Studio Community License includes free access to all 1,600+ controls and is available to companies and individuals with less than $1 million USD in annual gross revenue, 5 or fewer developers, and 10 or fewer total employees. Note: An entity or organization may not have ever received more than $3,000,000 USD in capital from an outside source, such as private equity or venture capital, in order to be eligible for the Community License.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer ExperienceSyncfusion Essential Studio
Considered Both Products
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
I've used SharePoint a lot. We've used a handful of other bespoke previous, like jula based clients for talking to customers, Jula based platform, some other open source ones, but most of the companies I work for already have a footprint in Salesforce, so it's usually the, …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Adept Agent Stack
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
This fits into the mold with the other Salesforce services. Once you get used to the suite and the nuances of each platform, things become easy. Just read any documentation first, as jumping in will only get you so far, and the more connections with the other apps, the more …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
We have only used Salesforce CMS in our organizations as we already use Salesforce CRM for sales, marketing and other purposes
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Hubspot CSM is a bit easier to use, but not as strong for bigger markets like enterprise. Also, it's a bit annoying having to log into different platforms. Being able to do everything directly in Salesforce is pretty nice.
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
This is really the first time we had a platform such as SF, so we have nothing to which to compare it.
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
We have always been a Salesforce shop, but have grown with the App Cloud platform as it's evolved. We eventually moved to lightning based on the streamlined interface and increased ease of use for our employees. So far we are happy with the results. Would definitely recommend …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Salesforce, while more expensive, provides faster support, higher scalability options, and an increased opportunity to change any details whether it's about user permissions management, custom field or object creation, or an integration of another application. What really sets …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
We were previously using an older version prior to it becoming Salesforce Lightning Platform so we were well adverse on the advantages of using a CRM, to begin with. It made sense to convert to Salesforce Lightning Platform after we were given a free trial of the platform. …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
I think Salesforce has the most powerful developer engine - I have yet to need a module that I couldn't create (maybe with help). I probably could have made the others work but Salesforce, in my opinion, made it the easiest. Salesforce is reliable and established as well so …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
I would love to switch back to Service Cloud as it was much, much more intuitive and fast. I would even take Salesforce Classic over Lightning. It at least wasn't this slow.
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
I used a program formerly known as "CP." I considered it somewhat outdated, and it does not have any of the modern features that the Salesforce Lightning Platform (formerly Salesforce App Cloud) has. I consider the Salesforce Lightning Platform (formerly Salesforce App Cloud) …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
I use both. SF is the constant through the organization and I receive leads into SF and pass on opportunities through SF.
SL is better for internal processes within business dev.
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Salesforce is the premeire product. Period. The others are cheaper and less capable, they may fulfill your organisation's needs but you will always be looking at Salesforce with wishful eyes. If you are a company that needs to bootstrap then spend the time to evaluate your …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Microsoft is pretty limited in functionality compared to Salesforce. Most folks coming into your organization are going to have some level of Salesforce experience but will most likely not have experience with Dynamics. Dynamics doesn't connect as well to other platforms.
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
I believe the only reason we didn't choose Monday.com is because we're just a bit bigger (company size- 75 people) than what Monday.com handles. We also are in San Francisco, and Salesforce pretty much owns this entire city. I was also not part of the selection process of the …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
There is a reason why the Salesforce Lightning Platform is the market leader for all things related to customer relationship management. While Close is somewhat user-friendly, it pales in comparison to all the features, bells, and whistles that the Salesforce Lightning Platform …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
We originally used spreadsheets when we first started. That worked fine until we started growing by over 100% year over year. We were able to upload all of our previous accounts in Salesforce Classic once it was called for. However, Salesforce Classic soon became redundant and …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
We needed a product that would allow for easy and dynamic reports for potential and new clients. Account Managers use other products as well to monitor the client's success and Salesforce allows for seamless integration to other platforms. This serves as a one-stop-shop for all …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
We currently use the two together, along with Hubspot sales. Salesforce is our primary CRM and where we track and manage account and contact information.
Salesforce is much more flexible and intuitive - everything is where you would expect it to be.
Hubspot reporting is …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
I think that the Lightning platform is not as clean and doesn't integrate that well. Whenever I was logged out, it was such a treck to have to log back in and I never actually knew if my activity was being saved or actually being tracked. Personally, Lightning is not my …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Close and Salesforce are two very different beasts. Close is much more user friendly but lacks the ability to serve complex infrastructures and hierarchies provided by Salesforce. Close is much simpler and faster--great for high volume but will not provide you with rich, …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Salesforce App Cloud provides a very easy way for you to install apps as well as deploy your own apps. You are, however, limited to the Salesforce marketplace and the requirements that they have for apps to be published in their marketplace. Even so, it's still fairly easy to …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
This is the only tool in this field we have any involvement/experience with.
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
We haven't used anything exactly like Salesforce App Cloud, but in the end we decided to use our own development environment/process and deploy via Heroku. Therefore, I can't speak to how App Cloud compares to other more integrated solutions, but for our needs it was easier to …
Syncfusion Essential Studio
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
The products mentioned are not really in the same category as Syncfusion. As far similar type of products are concerned, we haven't used others. We have evaluated for sometime but did not use. The main reason was the support service.
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
While both are great, Syncfusion® Essential Studio® offers Community License rather than a limited period Evaluation/Trial license.
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
It displays Word documents in most accurate way.
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Syncfusion beats the other because they have a great licence option for small companies.

For big companies with decent budgets, I find Kendo easier to use but it's only a matter of taste
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Radzen seemed like a quality product but we needed more control over the interface than they could allow. I don't recall the details about Telerik and Kendo. I think Telerik also rated high but was more expensive?
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Devexpress was late in developing Blazor controls so we refocused on Syncfusion. As I mentioned, Syncfusion has much better financial support for small businesses.
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
I only used open source tools, as every other solution offered by companies are paid and they don`t offer any free license. Like I said before, the free license for developers and small businesses is a amazing feature that Syncfusion provides and they are the only one that do …
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Yes, I use another framework at the same time. I am going to be very honest: the other framework is very good. There are two aspects, one positive and other negative: - The positive aspect of the other framework is the execution time. Is more faster than Syncfusion Essential …
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Infragistics Ultimate UI - less versions, lack of Office document processing, few UI frameworks missing, worse ROI
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Firstly, there is a free version for small businesses and it allows you to jump start without risk. I found one of the other products a bit short in the number of out-of-the-box supported events handlers for each control and, although you can manually add them, I feel more …
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Telerik is similar in content and functionality. I used it for 1 yr and switched to Syncfusion based on price. I have never considered going back to Telerik
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
I think variability and rich features and variable to connect to the business need.
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
For the past eight years, we have not evaluated any other products, as we have found our current solution to be highly effective and have had no reason to consider alternatives.
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
The free community license is a major element, but it also allowed a fast start with minimal learning curve compared to adopting alternative solutions.
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Quite same but that documentation... Keep it as good as it is now.
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Syncfusion is a clear winner over what Telerik has to offer in functionality, rapid development and hands down on support. I disliked how Telerik decides if they will fix reported bugs or suggested product enhancements. Syncfusion in my opinion is far more cost effective as …
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
We evaluated DevExpress and two other libraries, whose names I've currently forgotten. But in the end, it was a race between DevExpress and Syncfusion Essential Studio Enterprise Edition, as they both offer a great amount of components with rich documentation. In the end we …
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
We are using this to developed windows form and I am fully satisfied with their performance and speed up development.it also provides easy to integrate with visual studio.it can also support vb.net, asp.net, MVC, and .net core web applications with a responsive user interface …
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
We have tried Infragistics and DevExpress and didn't have the variety of components that we needed
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
Currently using it but we will do more research on D3
Chose Syncfusion Essential Studio
They are basically on par, but the docs and in general, including support, Telerik is a bit superior. I find it to be better in terms of user-friendliness and also better polished UI wise, I mean, overall they just look better and offer somewhat better themes/skins to all the …
Features
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer ExperienceSyncfusion Essential Studio
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
7.2
Ratings
7% below category average
Syncfusion Essential Studio
-
Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform management overhead8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform access control7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment creation7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment replication6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue recovery6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer ExperienceSyncfusion Essential Studio
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.2 out of 10
React (React.js)
React (React.js)
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
React (React.js)
React (React.js)
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
React (React.js)
React (React.js)
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer ExperienceSyncfusion Essential Studio
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.1
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer ExperienceSyncfusion Essential Studio
Likelihood to Recommend
Salesforce CMS is well suited for those companies which are already using Salesforce. If you want to provide personalized content according to individual customer. If you want to share the content across multiple channels. Salesforce CMS is not typically suited for companies not using salesforce. Simple blogging does not require a Salesforce CMS.
Read full review
The datagrid is probably their most popular control I would think. It is so flexible and configurable. Most of mine are plain views in ASP.NET Core, but I have a whole bunch that are dynamically created at runtime in my controller. That is so powerful.
Read full review
Pros
  • Reporting and Dashboards are thorough and can show a wealth of important data to inform and scale processes. It's helpful in a high volume sales cycle to be able to quickly identify weak points in performance and productivity so that adjustments can be made.
  • Highly customizable. We are able to customize just about everything which allows us to track very specific things and in theory create better efficiency.
  • Parent/Child account hierarchy exists which is helpful.
  • Contact records can be associated with multiple accounts and opportunities. This, in theory, should minimize duplicates and mismanagement of contacts.
  • Console helps a lot with data nesting. Having a fairly comprehensive look at an account without searching through various tabs and sections speeds up an otherwise cumbersome platform.
Read full review
  • Integrates well into Microsoft tech stack. i.e. ASP.NET, Blazor etc. So it acts as a plug-n-play, which is great!
  • Shrinks the development cycle without adding too much of its own ecosystem overhead.
  • Provides different UI skins so the controls don't appear as "stitched".
Read full review
Cons
  • It takes a while before it recognizes bounced emails.
  • We get so many notifications from a single action. Not sure if this can be modified in the settings though.
  • Error messages are sometimes unclear which makes it hard for us to identify the problem.
Read full review
  • Most complex activities (beyond the out of the box examples) require a very extensive knowledge of javascript. This is not really a short coming of the product but rather a reality for the user who is trying to fully utilize the capabilities of the software.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It takes effort to include a new component library into existing software, especially in our case where we have 5 large applications that are written and maintained by about 100 developers. So changing such a core thing comes with a lot of effort. The other reason we will very likely renew our use of Syncfusion Essential Studio Enterprise Edition is that it works really well and has helped us to speed up the development process.
Read full review
Usability
It's very good, but it's still living in a little bit in an older design aspect, but I think a lot of it is about to come out, just hasn't quite gotten there yet. Still a little clunky from a you have to know it to know it or you know it to use it. It takes a little bit of training to get into it. It's not quite the, anybody can come in and start using it immediately, type feel.
Read full review
I would rate Syncfusion® Essential Studio® a 10 out of 10 for overall usability. The components are intuitive to implement, with clear APIs and consistent design patterns across the suite. This makes it easy for developers to get started quickly and reduces the learning curve even when working with new controls.
In addition, the documentation and sample projects provide practical guidance that helps accelerate development. The built-in customization options also allow us to adapt the components to fit our branding and business requirements without excessive effort. Overall, the usability is one of the key reasons why Syncfusion has become an essential part of our development toolset.
Read full review
Support Rating
Salesforce's support is top-notch. They have subject-matter experts that are accessible at all times to address needs as they come up. They let you know in advance when there are system updates and enhancements so that you are prepared for upcoming changes. I've never had an issue that wasn't addressed immediately when reaching out for support.
Read full review
Although I have decades of software development experience, I had never created a website from scratch before, and my html and css skills are not particularly strong. Between documentation and incredible dedication from the support team they helped me overcome all of my challenges. It's amazing that they typically create sample code for most of the issues that I submitted. On rare occasions where I uncovered a defect they kept me informed as to its status, and typically resolved it in a short-term release, and/or gave me a reasonable workaround. They hopped on zoom calls with me on multiple occasions when necessary.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Feedback from the team has been very positive.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
This fits into the mold with the other Salesforce services. Once you get used to the suite and the nuances of each platform, things become easy. Just read any documentation first, as jumping in will only get you so far, and the more connections with the other apps, the more complex it gets.
Read full review
Firstly, there is a free version for small businesses and it allows you to jump start without risk. I found one of the other products a bit short in the number of out-of-the-box supported events handlers for each control and, although you can manually add them, I feel more comfortable to just have them ready. After using the free version I just felt in love with Syncfusion Essential Studio Enterprise Edition controls and decided to stay with them; they have all I need and more. The usage of Syncfusion Essential Studio Enterprise Edition controls is straightforward and intuitive. Support is world-class even for the free version; you get answers in 24 hours at most. Also, the support team is ready to remotely connect to your project in case it is needed; we have had one situation like this, and the issue was solved.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has a smooth integration with Salesforce CMS application which can make it a positive for enhanced performance.
  • It may require extensive training for new joiners and that can become costly for the organization.
  • It also has automation features that reduce the distribution time by a significant number.
Read full review
  • First of all, I think the best positive impact is the reduce of time development. I do not know exactly how much time, but certainly, using the framework we save a lot of effort and time.
  • About negative impact, sometimes using the controls of the framewrok have a signifcant impact in the execution time and page load.
  • And of course, the use of Syncfusion Essential Studio Enterprise Edition has a significant impact of the learning of javascript and JQUERY.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Syncfusion Essential Studio Screenshots

Screenshot of An overview of Syncfusion® Essential Studio®, which is a software package that includes more than 1,600 components and frameworks for WinForms, WPF, ASP.NET (Web Forms, MVC, Core), UWP, WinUI, Flutter, Blazor, JavaScript, Angular, Vue, and React.Screenshot of The DataGrid control, which is a grid component that helps display and manipulate large amounts of data in a tabular format. Its feature set includes functionalities like data binding, sorting, grouping, editing, filtering, swiping, dragging, resizing, loading more items, pull-to-refresh, and exporting to Excel and PDF file formats.Screenshot of The PDF Viewer, which is .NET PDF class library developed with 100% managed C# code that can be used to create, read, and write PDFs.