What users are saying about
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring#question3' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>Customer Verified: Read more.</a>
Top Rated
44 Ratings
3 Ratings

SingleStore

<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring#question3' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>Customer Verified: Read more.</a>
Top Rated
44 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 9.1 out of 100
3 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7 out of 100

Attribute Ratings

  • Tibero is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

Likelihood to Recommend

9.1

SingleStore

91%
32 Ratings
9.2

Tibero

92%
2 Ratings

Likelihood to Renew

10.0

SingleStore

100%
3 Ratings

Tibero

N/A
0 Ratings

Usability

7.6

SingleStore

76%
6 Ratings

Tibero

N/A
0 Ratings

Performance

9.4

SingleStore

94%
6 Ratings

Tibero

N/A
0 Ratings

Support Rating

7.7

SingleStore

77%
6 Ratings

Tibero

N/A
0 Ratings

Likelihood to Recommend

SingleStore

SingleStore environment is easy to adapt, it is extremely fast on collecting data from different sources (AWS, GCP or Azure), provides monitoring of activities and easy use multiple databases. It is good for analytical and recommendation based scenarios, and provides fast results on complex queries. In SingleStore platform queries execution open new tab result for each run, which makes it difficult to navigate over the results.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Tibero

I cannot imagine where Tibero will be less appropriate. For anyone looking for a reliable RDBM software, I suggest reviewing Tibero's data sheet for more details of its features and decide for yourself, if this software would work best for your organization.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

SingleStore

  • Return results of complex queries scanning TBs of data in sub-seconds.
  • Customer support team answer tickets quickly and provide guidance.
  • MySQL engine which allows to query using simple MySQL drivers from different clients.
  • Queries profiling is easy to use and helps investigating performance.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Tibero

  • Robustness
  • Feature set
  • Security
  • Cost
Barron Grenwald | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

SingleStore

  • We wish the product had better support for High Availability of the aggregator. Currently the indexes generated by the two different aggregators are not in the same sequential space and so our apps have more burden to deal with HA.
  • More tools for debugging issues such as high memory usage would be good.
  • The price was the one that kept us away from purchasing for the first few years. Now we are able to afford due to a promotion that gives it at 25% of the list price. Not sure if we'll continue after the promotion offer expires in another 2 years.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Tibero

  • Working with Tibero for the last 5 years, I haven't noticed any issues so far.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

SingleStore

General

Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level set up fee?
Optional

Starting Price

$69 per hour

SingleStore Editions & Modules

Edition
OnDemand0.691
  1. per hour
Additional Pricing Details

Tibero

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?

Starting Price

Tibero Editions & Modules

Additional Pricing Details

Likelihood to Renew

SingleStore

SingleStore 10.0
Based on 3 answers
We haven't seen a faster relation database. Period. Which is why we are super happy customers and will for sure renew our license.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Tibero

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Usability

SingleStore

SingleStore 7.6
Based on 6 answers
[Until it is] supported on AWS ECS containers, I will reserve a higher rating for SingleStore. Right now it works well on EC2 and serves our current purpose, [but] would look forward to seeing SingleStore respond to our urge of feature in a shorter time period with high quality and security.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Tibero

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Performance

SingleStore

SingleStore 9.4
Based on 6 answers
It seems good at being able to handle complex queries against large datasets out of the box. In the past, we've had to do quite a bit of manual configuration and database performance-tuning, but SingleStore (so far) has seemed to require minimal configuration in this aspect. Both data imports/exports, as well as queries against the data, run very fast.
Ruslan Smirnov | TrustRadius Reviewer

Tibero

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Support Rating

SingleStore

SingleStore 7.7
Based on 6 answers
Very responsive to trouble tickets - Often, I think, the SingleStore's monitoring systems have already alerted the engineers by the time I get around to writing a ticket (about 10 - 20 mins after we see a problem). I feel like things are escalated nicely and SingleStore takes resolving trouble tickets seriously. Also SingleStore follows up after incidents to with a post mortem and actionable takaways to improve the product. Very satisfied here.
John Barry | TrustRadius Reviewer

Tibero

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

SingleStore

Vertica, Snowflake, SQL Server, Azure Data Warehouse, PowerBI, Aerospike, etc.From what I've seen MemSQL is well worth the cost when latency and data freshness needs are high, i.e. you need a lot of queries to run with UI latency (the query itself takes less than a second or so), with very fresh streaming fact and dimensional data. It will be more expensive per "unit of performance" but if you need that performance then it'll get the job done.
  • On-prem Vertica (note, not Eon) provides more knobs for optimizing a particular data set and set of queries against it and performs as well or better in a single table, fact table queries. It will also scale to data size more cheaply due to its on-disk model. For large queries against large data sets where data freshness isn't as important (and latency either is or isn't), I'd take Vertica, although if you need to do a lot of joins that will struggle). However, as they still are exclusively columnar, dimension table updates, and recalls based on them, can only be tuned to happen so fast (we could do much better than 10 seconds with 10-100 updates per second for raw replication, and Vertica's joins are always slow so recalls were worse).
  • Snowflake suffers similarly to Vertica in the data freshness, replication, and re-calc area; SF also doesn't give as many knobs to turn as Vertica for data set optimization but seems to be better at joins. If you have a lot of queries to run against a lot of data and joins are limited, you need query latency low and consistent but you don't need a ton of freshness, I'd stick with Vertica. If joins matter more, or you can accept notably-but-not-terribly worse performance, then Snowflake is fine and cheaper from what we've seen. (Again, I can't speak to SF vs Vertica Eon).
  • SQL Server and ADW we couldn't get to perform as well as the other options, but I'll say we didn't try that hard on those.
  • Aerospike is amazing as a KV store; however for OLAP use cases where you want to balance performance against the flexibility of queries against general event (time series) data (i.e. be able to roll up to different grains) then KV becomes challenging.
  • PBI is great if you want an integrated BI tool, but if you want an OLAP solution to build against, with some particular scale or performance needs to be mentioned above, I'd go with one of these other solutions. It really can be great for letting non-tech folks build relatively small data sets and quick insights for customers (internal or external), great leverage in that case.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Tibero

As for features it's more or less the same with lower licensing fees, if you are running on either of the bigger DB providers and you want to port over your data they can do it for you. We chose it after reviewing about 10 different DB providers but didn't want to go with open source.
Barron Grenwald | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

SingleStore

  • As the overall performance and functionality were expanded, we are able to deliver our data much faster than before, which increases the demand for data.
  • Metadata is available in the platform by default, like metadata on the pipelines. Also, the information schema has lots of metadata, making it easy to load our assets to the data catalog.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Tibero

  • Because Tibero's licensing and support fees are half of Oracle's, we were able to allocate the extra budget to other departments that were in greater need for those funds.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Screenshots

Add comparison